Feb 5, 2021

Paradigmism: Brand-new theory as expansive as

 Marxism

Probably most bombastic ever for class, some referenced yet but use of many posted lessons.

What is aaging so far?

The basics is Sinclair 2019. Then the basis is as described here. Current research is on what I do.

Is there any semantic logic to what you state and live by?

Yes RDS and paradigm which are basic to my life and think. Paradigm thinking is from aping the great professor Dr. Jerome Feldman. The fundamental truths must be emergent, they can not be determined by successive process of refinement due to the well known process of impossibility of answering repeated 'why?' for any theory. For example, strong classic engineering uses viscosity, temperature, resistance etc but these mean nothing to molecules, these are emergent truths, from statistical behavior of molecules.

RDS expands on RS rational skepticism essential to all science which must be falsifiable and accepted because of RS examined experiments and observations. The critical improvement is D for double skepticism which accepts, wrong in current belief, but nevertheless equal, detractors of two kinds, one who are unaware of some relevant fact, and the other created by ideology or propaganda who pretend or can't accept a correction for intellectual or cost reasons. Preferred ways are democratic, but secession and violence are two other alternatives in extreme. A historian must add claim to failures that lead to these extreme steps.

Paradigm theory?

Paradigm divides the world into those who feel it and those that don't, including its introduction in 1963. When a (scientific (Kuhn restriction), social, political etc) theory changes in paradigm sense, it is difficult for seniors of old to see or appreciate the change and accept equality with neophytes. In politics, one can not accept the victory of the opposition. In India, it happened in 2000, in 2005, and 2014. About farming, one can talk of zamindari abolition, green revolution and current shortage versus plentiful farming. One must add white revolution (dairy) to it.

Class theory is Marxism, although Marx never invented the term class conflict, (it is how he views history). It views every process dialectic-ally.

If you want to name me, I prefer the term Paradigm theory with RDS for process functioning and truth. There are two critical areas I wish to apply it for non-intellectual personal reasons - aging (for I grow old) and robot-ese (voice commands are here. How do I use robots without logical errors (black box transcripts for inevitable disasters) but not knowing logic or rigidly applying it)!

Aging

Who are the morons?

Non-believers in evolution. Most existing doctors without genetics knowledge.

What lays the biological foundations?

Sinclair genetic correction of DNA damage. Same works in all cellular life forms, series based on size of bacteria to human to whales; and series based on complexity of plants, animals to humans. The remarkable benefit of theory is that aging hurts the epigenome, thus reversion to lower age (and even looks) and potential quasi-immortality is a by product of killing aging. That is because birth DNA is preserved pristine. Read it in conjunction of opto-genetics, even my TBI deficits are engineer-able and digital brain readout is possible, essential for true immortality.

What lays the biological correction procedures?

One is genetic, derived from some Yamanaka factors applied by repeated punctuation. Two is evolution based technique of Dr. Sinclair aped. Three is plasma update. Excluded are telomere length based techniques. Benefits of aping and plasma are likely 1 shot and 10-20 years. Yamanaka factor derived techniques are likely always repeatable, or at least have unknown repeat limit based on say entropy.

Making anything a science, in particular, aging!

RDS means RS and treatment of other people opinions. To make procedure scientific, you need something objectively measurable. It is measured before and after an experiment. That measure must objectively change by the procedure. To make AAging scientific, the bioage must change (reduction) and bioage must be correlated with rest of life to death. Horvath pioneered bio-age, there are now other measures too. The clock applies to many species, on a species basis. So any random guru can make any claim. The procedure can be falsified! The only other subrule of D is on burden of proof. It lies on the maker of any claim! No one is allowed to make any unfalsifiable or unprovable (at least referenced to an objective test).

Robot-ese

RDS is a philosophy, one of many!

But unequal and objectively superior. It is implementable to believable letters made in online letters using my encryption technology. That is what mean by objective in this case! Soon, you will be able to RDS test it - try to lie to a friend or not, By putting the letter in a program, the friend will be able to discover your lie! But that is not the reason for RDS, which is safe efficacious robot control.

What about the future of RDS?

Scientific people will dispute while there are two or more. Can there be a resolution ever? In three categories - solved (RDS), unsolvable (proved) or open (research needed if useful). RDS will be a solution for RDS can prove itself applying RDS! People encountering Gödel work are nonplussed but won't be once one realizes how few they are in the real practical world even if some simple ones in theory are!