After identifying some of the greatest doctors, the next question raised is the value added by me a Ph.D., nor an MD. After reading through independent systems, any intelligent patient will ask questions that also arose in me and those I have intelligently answered.
1. What is my goal? Why do I consider the set of identified as de-aging 1.0?
Aging is divided by me into arrest/slowing and reset. Proof of acceptable quality is missing for any of the identified methods of having a reliable reset.
De-aging 2.0 happens when the age reversal becomes reliable. Till then slowing aging is insufficient,. Anecdotal evidence suggests that methods identified might be developable to reliable reset, but I do not believe that. That is because all are different from Yamanaka factors on which research is in progress and will likely result in usable protocol and chemicals within 5-20 years. The goal is to live somehow till the singularity-1.0 that will be built around Yamanaka factors.
2. Dr. Yamanaka converted (induced) any cell by the application of Yamanaka factors OSKM into new master cells capable of becoming any cell, IE converted to iPSC cells. Magic occurs since the same factors do it to any Eutheria animal and beyond. This suggests the correctness of evolution. Another magic occurs from the 1928 research which grew a normal frog from the denucleated frog masters with the nucleus from the usual aged frog! The genetic information is somehow preserved, which is possible with epigenome somehow shutting off and off genes depending on the cell form (hair, skin, bone, organ, brain, etc), Another strong suggestion comes from no child is ever born old, regardless of mother and father age, humans or animals!
Remarkable magic in nature is that Yamanaka factors are capable of being taken as a medicine in short duration pulses by living humans. Reverting to iPSC multiple cells gives you cancers, but pulsed usage keeps the specialization but reduces the age! That suggests to me that age reversal is feasible and doable in the next 20 years. And one can live at least 20, more likely 100 years, using the identified technologies.
3. Let me keep to my scholarliness. This means no statements on unit security, safety, and efficacy. The doctors should be replaced by companies to provide indefinite life. However, the methods are analyzed from the angle of the method of taking (drug delivery), composing, Bioavailability, chemical sources, dosages, and purity.
These seem obvious, but are not, and apply to medicine for all illnesses, even supplements, and food. Drugs are not like products. They cannot be blindly composed. The delivery method is crucial. C is absolutely important. Sellers' quality judgments require experience. Dosages require results experience.
4. composition
Su we describe the recommendations by defined words, using the name of the major known initiator (independent of contemptuous origin research).
A. Dr. Sinclair and NAD+ boosting
B. Dr de Grey and senolytics
C. Dr. Kennedy, and AKG
D. HEALTH-boosters D3/K2 and Hyaluronic acid
E. Dr. Fahy and IGF-1/DHEA
I wait and watch C60/oleic-acid and E5.
The next document describes all. The five methods above seem independent and composable.
5. Who is right?
The top question in the mind of a consumer, presented with contradictory information is always who is right. Even if one starts normal, all intelligent turn cynics by short experience. My claim I know should shock many! I claim it depends on how fast you want answers - quickly if the recommender also transparently applies recommendations to self (unlike illnesses, aging strikes us all). The longer-term is FDA.
6. Drug delivery method and Bioavailability
Both are distinct, but same for liposomes, while as slow, roughly, as powder, liposome provides great dissolvability, protects the medicine from stomach and liver, to intact delivery to blood and easy cell entry because call skin is like liposome skin. There is no cell group direction unless prebuilt into lipo skin so injection delivery of liposomes is used for delivery, but uses a medico to administer, difficult for a supplement. Unlike diseases, the target can be any cell, and direction is only needed for efficient application uniformly.
7. Product Purity
Purity in the USA is food-grade(97%) and pharmaceutical-grade(99%). The contaminants can not be contradictory. Given market administration is essentially decentralized, a similar system is legally needed. A typical confusion is court job. Most drugs I use are liposomes, hence pharmaceutical grade is needed anyway.
8. Dosage, Sellers, Period, checking, monitoring, feedback, others
A list of selected physicians is attached here for a monitor of patients, not self-proficient. They will perform Dosage, Sellers, Period, checking, monitoring, feedback, others based on a database from us that will reflect province, national, and international EXPERIENCE.
I consider myself super-proficient but run my list to my doctor, Dr. Neeti MD, and accept and perform her orders.
No comments:
Post a Comment