Monday, March 29, 2021

Apheresis in depth

 



The latest link

I am requesting an apheresis to extend my health span using TPE, an unusual procedure for India, even the world for this purpose, although Drs. Conboy will be attempting it for FDA clinical experience, where TPE is routinely done for autoimmune diseases using an FDA approved procedure for these problems. It implies safety within rationality. The safety profile can be judged from this, from which I conclude low probability (4%) of adverse effects, none leading to death. Even that low risk is not to be taken but for strong belief in efficacy, admittedly a question mark, but my effort can lead to a proper FDA acceptable trial in India and more important is a genuine alternative for mother and doctor uncle.


Google big shot Kurzweil thinks that1-year-gain-healthspan-per-year singularity happens in 2025. Given the lack of sophistication of my prediction tools, I predict 2030. The essential point is that in either case, the 5-10 year life needed is under 10 years that is within the estimated gains from TPE. However, it also seems possible with iv-NMN, in which case TPE becomes a valuable procedure in reserve, and highly probable is its FDA approval by 2030. But then how do I convince M+U to go for unapproved FDA procedure of NMN, which I believe is better than NR. One way is to find some way to convince them to take Basis FDA approved medicine. It is better than nothing but the costs scare them/me - true service not believed, Even convincing mother to take K2 is hard. Even approved means no risk but no one talks wish-death-accident life past the singularity! Of course, I am the romantic Wolkenkuckucksheim moron brainwashed to believe wish-theories!


The singularity will not be universally accepted for many years. Nothing visible will happen to the beneficiaries. One can safely predict world-wide dangerous admixtures with unpredictable spans. Every moronic criminal will sell/advise a theocratic version of the procedure! After 10 years, the genuines will win but might not! In fact, the reasonable way is to shield true beneficiaries from accidents, required shared equitable military risk and leave the non-trusting population to its fate.

No comments:

Post a Comment