The Real criminals in my aaqgs-weltanschauung

Goals of a weltanschaunng are simple - have a model of universe to know reality, of aging to decide on pattern of living, and of people to decide how the collective i.e. society acts. This is continuous investigations into behavior.

The unimaginable perfect way to criminality is become unconscious responsible criminals that oversee law! Responsibility, in aaqgs weltanschauung, overrides unconscious intent, hence existing lawyers and judges are philosophically jail-worthy guilty of unleashing fine-print-devil in guise of stare decisis. It follows that even if one court successfully leashes this devil, then by stare decisis, it stands in all courts in hierarchy or mutually respectful (base of law like Indian evidence act 1872 from Britain, also see USA rules).

The aaqgs solution i.e. mine is very simple – the semantics of any text is determined not by careful legal reading, but by a jury cursorily (time decided by legal determination).  Only if the defence has taken steps to ensure understanding (decided by cursory legality), will deeper semantics prevail. If excess time is required than the defender is guilty of attempting evil advertisement! If the lawyer is judged to waste time of court by advancing arguments judged to be fail-worthy by another judge, jailed (requires videotaping but not publication of tape). If a judge allows significant illegality, then judge jailed. The entire appeal system needs to be corrected! It’s like license-raj monstrosity in India. By required videotaping and possibility of adverse judgment on same facts, everyone is forced to be vigilant and fair!

My weltanschauung fails to distinguish between incompetent and criminal. From victim’s point-of-view, what’s the difference? Upper elements in a hierarchy, particularly job-givers, must be rewarded or punished, based on performance of the selected based on votes cast confidentially, consistent with reservation scheme, over some years like 1-3. This also applies to teachers, based on taxes paid by taught, once they turn, say 25, to say 35, diminished by that paid by parents, equally compared, corrected by inflation and national growth etc.

Roughly, I believe in skin-in-the-game and systems constructed such that it can be measured and be rewarded or punished, based on objectives of the system. For me, happiness means with high probability, a robust long behaviorally-happy life and outside chance of singularity, with needs consistent with what I own. In my sense I am happy and have set up world to remain so, improving some thru software and writings, and sisters' help, barring unforeseen.