BBC says it too!
It is my strong belief that it is possible, can be achieved in normal ways, and lead to indefinitely longer life. I am perhaps a month early to Musk who indepently discovered the main idea to indefinite life and researches in the new company Neuralink!
A friend objected to the wish for Two hundred year life on grounds that it would be tiring. Another on grounds it was wished but never shown! How could even that be done, let alone indefinite life!
My plan calls for only 200 year biological life, since the indefinite future life is as an cyborg. I assume that Neuralink or competitor would be successful by end of 21st century to middle of 22nd. The Real issue is life extension till then. Physical prowess or looks are unimportant then. But physical health and vigor is crucial to live to 120. Means the next required step be done in next 60 years. The last 80 years or longer are from hibernation or advances using tested medicine improvements.
The wish for and research in life extension is as old as humanity as are nay-Sayers who say it can't be done. It is extremely easy to be emfubarred by products with anecdotal even statistical backing. So what then?
Aaqgs-epistemology: Easy for me <TBD why these> – only trust unhackable endorsements by trusties. No need even to argue who there – if any more, their judgments and org will be endorsed by the basic! WHO TRUST in an arena of 99% subhuman-equivalent thugs and ALL adsters? British cochrane and sens. None from USA including CDA.
There is plenty of aaqgs-stupid stuff floating around like this. If you draw natural conclusions here, you join the rank of aaqgs-gone-case-subanimal!
My program – self-applied first - is derived from many ideas
- People
have a tendency to lie, reinterpret, be manipulated. Any
majoritarian democractic science is absurd.
- Anecdotal
science is always very suspect.
- Statistical data is very easily abused. Only documented and paid counter-experiments are needed. CDA is too easily manipulated in difficult areas.
As we understand the underlying unity of disease mechanisms (major are insulin caused glycation, telomere shortening and free radicals), it makes sense to adopt following plan
1. Ordinary physicians, ECP, diet and exercise for 95 age.
2. Extra-ordinary in-pipeline meds from age-specialists next 25 years
3. Hibernation or sci fi meds next 80- years
4. Transmission to electronic brains end 21 to mid 22 century
5. Anti-fragile thereafter
1. Ordinary physicians, ECP, diet and exercise for 95 age.
2. Extra-ordinary in-pipeline meds from age-specialists next 25 years
3. Hibernation or sci fi meds next 80- years
4. Transmission to electronic brains end 21 to mid 22 century
5. Anti-fragile thereafter
No comments:
Post a Comment