Aaqgs-Religion

Why does a happy agnostic so far, need agnostic religion?

1. Expand the limits of comprehension and argumentation
   
2. Determine gaps in comprehension to make amends when possible
   
3. Comprehend more my comprehension system
   
4. Consider and evaluate ways of cheating death
   There are some constraints from my past thinking
   Science is good, social sciences stupid, humanities entertainment with NO governance impact, only needed to apploy existing rules and stand aside on need disappearence! NO one can teach you, you must empirically view rersults of processes an decide how to challenge temporal realities. I can certainly adcise on what will not work – faith, God, experience, books, irrational techniques. There are NO known empirical techniques and rare sensible extrapolations. Even sane post-death logic is hard, but you must not bow to will-free social norms!
   1. “default-OK = innocent unless proven guilty” and “default-thug = guilty unless proven innocent” are NOT definite choices but depend on the context. In general, current coreligionist gurus are considered default-thug requiring this kind of starting-defense. ALL great questions like abortion, social-laws, family-laws, religion, assisted-death etc are community based and not UNIFORM, only needing uniformity on conflict of rights. Indian constitution guarantees equality before law, but does not mandate equal;ity of sexes which can be interpreted in function equality, easily shown absurd). Thus triple divorce is unconstitutional, polygamy or polyandry is not.
   2. Right-to-reply and address-public-encryption is sufficient to permit free-speech in all contexts without requiring a court! A court and lawyers is a horrible sign of disharmony and stupidity! A system requiring these is fundamentally screwed up! The biggest reason for US and GB gains are directly caused by lack of legislation – it is fundamental to my aaqgs-think that maladies be cured by invention of uniformly available rights and government or courts step in to uniformly resolve conflicts and administration of laws. It is not a matter of faith considered ALWAYS to be the refuge of the scoundrel, but extrapolation. I have obtained novel solutions, applicable in century-21 to the problems of free speech (encryption), self-defense (activators) and democracy (none-of-above, fractional vote, right-to-recall, negative-vote, confidence&privacy which applies to voting, companies and committees!
   3. Right to defend is intrinsic to individual, group battle against groups, individual to oppression.
   4. Money is the medium of exchange. Private property rights flow from terrible mess in shared commons. Certain compromises have to be made, enforced through blind laws. Private property is based on compromise, not religions, hence must have a limit on the differences, the so-called margin-of-safety related to the average development of society and not independent of work-incentives – even marginal work needs to be respected. I strongly request the authorities to pay unemployment to garbage pickers and sorters at the very least; with incentive based payments.
   
5. 
   

1. Disclaimer – I strongly reject any attempt to relate me to God; aqnd look-down on such believers. They are often BETTER humans than me, I have NEVER encountered one with my broad range of interests and dependencies. It is the latter – abilities to uniformly extend narrow specialized betterment; typical of IAS in india; that gives me hopes of superior quality thinking and my excursions into law and philosophy that gives me the confidence of taking on professional lawyers and politicians. Modi and Yogi are outside, since I do not know what enables them to function well for decades with only 4 hour of sleep!