Aaqgs-democracy = stake-holder democracy

Stakeholder Definition

Too many existing subhumans believe in definite unique answers to great questions - birth-related abortion issues, living related what-religion issues, and death-related assisted-dearth issues. None of these great questions have definite answers, the right answer ALWAYS is stakeholder democracy prescription, that has regional and cultural divide. Aaqgs-encryption can provide the essential separation that makes it possible. Then the unique answer-er motherfuckers can be exiled from heaven and return of these sub animals can be prevented! Unless tolerance can be required and non-tolerant can be prevented from reinfection, toleration of every one is logically impossible! Toleration means intolerant ion of the intolerant! Those who are not willing to tolerate my views have no possibility of co-existence with me.

Fundamental to intolerance is the belief that no one else can have empirically testable difference of opinion. I apply to myself first. I believe in science, modern medicine and aaqgs-religion. None is by inheritance. Science means scientific method and application outside physical sciences. That leads to RP and why normal statistical error logic is wrong, while historical Bayesian logic is superior. Much harder than “what to believe” is “what not to believe”. Interestingly, “agree to disagree” does not mean quin sense, but difference in arguments. Only in the end does tolerance matter. So my religion is aaqgs, because I must know the nature that surrounds me, joyous existence, handling the aversions, semantic borderline complications like moot court resolution 

My views on modern medicine is healthy disbelief in outside the specialty and great belief in no-drug treatments like plants and exercise. It amazes me that a sickly man like myself can rationally dream of 200 year amortal life!

Which brings us to stake-holder democracy. While experiencing of plans in Delhi and Peking may make arguments, neither city has any relevance in new-york-city voting. Semantically we capture it in standing. Clearly a justifiable issue in border cases. Stake-holder democracy is a crucial concept in infinitely sub-dividable vote with multiple voting and right to recall. Computer is required and interval arithmetic redundant modes are needed for confidence and reliability. While plain aadhaar is still opposed,aa-aadhaar can be used for unabusable biological identity

Roughly, a person has a new-identity for every new transaction and only permitted correlations can exist between identities. Arbitrary admitted correlations are possible, that is why aa-aadhaar is very powerful concept.

There are very large number of voting and vote counting methods, and there exist many impossibility theorems that show that many desirable properties can not bne combined. I call them Impossibility-theorems. These are not new, thermodynamics delegates many processes to impossibility as it violates the second law. Entropy is a concept easily generalized to quantum mechanics using the concept of information. Every physical process preserves or increases information. Only time it fails is at creation time. So Impossibility-theorems exist. Faster-than-light speeds arte only possible with information transfer through entanglement!


Roughly then, Aaqgs-democracy = stake-holder democracy, and ALL known impossibility theorems like Arrow's are sidestepped, and the goal of sub-divisibility, gerrymandering, multiple votes and much-candidacy are retained.

Democracy Program