A Vital legal-political distinction

History will be kind to me, for I intend to write it.Winston Churchill

Even better is the journalist will be essentially limey!

Today I discovered wikispook, greatly admire them, have learned a lot, must incorporate wikileaks and snowden revelations, have considered essential distinction-wiki ways, do not consider their marvelous effort so far to be the final word and view the relation between wiki and wikispook to be like a project-fork and consider what will be required for a project-join. Never mind the motivations, the narrative in Wikipedia is (claim) being legally abused within the honest careful definitions by current Wikipedia team by big advertisers, polemicist and powers that be. It is needed that the identifiers of current abuses not be taken as final word either and a useful general scheme be considered for future-forks.

One way to unify, while permitting wide changes is to draw lesson from my aaqgs-lan and consider every text to be a pair – the content and the fork-set in which the text holds! At any point in perusal, all the possibilities present are considered, if only one corresponds to the belief system of the consumer, then that is followed, if none then so informed and labels of those present, while if many then click-choice presented. It immediately satisfies my complaint thst outside physical sciences, it is rare to find truth-agreement, encyclopedic-the-truth approach fails, communitarian truth makes sense, and democratic way can be constructed both to allow all truths as well perusals of convenient truths interspersed with random inconvenient truths placing a limit on such arguments. Given a population, and consumer-oriented random, inconvenient truths will statistically ignite s portion od population without snowing any one!

It is part of the capabilities of a lawyer to weigh the semantics of all words, be they explantion or explanotry expansion. In each case, the questions of semantics of who and satisfactory deistinction from congusing similar words is done. While normal people can eventually get at the answer, experience enables the answer t be produced at once. Trick is to avoid into unrequired exp-ansions, by requiring the lawyer to state the need and counter-questions which may be asked by limited-intelligence (all lawyers THINK they are smart, so have many whites to less-gifted me) which gives you time to think! Judges don't like thinkers but semi-stupid brown is tolerated. Don't forget to lace your dialog with praise of the enemy!

There is in today, an unholy unscrupulous nexus of liberals-lawyers-politicians-journalist that color information to their taste and provoke a backlash being slowly felt where they are no longer listened to and lied by general population. I interpret the steady worldwide gain of rightists in this way. People are SICK of lying politically-correct unscrupulous by-action leftists. Whta makes me very happy is that the rightists they love are increasingly visible as equally unscrupulous in social and religious matters; exactly like the rulers they rebelled against and thought they had finally overcome! This confusion is the precise god-send opportunity for aaqgs-me – socially left wing and politically right wing, only difference is the consistency and uniform sensible aaqgs-philosophy naturally left+right wing, away from right-wing hysteria but still accepting the failure of the communist-socialist model in economics. That rejection is required rejection of unionism to right-to-work, propaganda with right-to-reply etc. It is certain to make advertisers on right wince – the right-wing truth-monopoly will be sunk by right-of-reply link dedicated tax. NO ONE will be able to use any public communication media without inserting link to the unholy – perhaps expectation-of-support sorted list of links. I am strongly reminded of the famous caricature of the right wing in movie “Dr. Strangelove or: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Bomb “ https://www.wikiwand.com/en/Dr._Strangelove which had a short disclaimer by the air force at the beginning or lots of legally mandated disclaimers in colleague mails – they will all allowed to be links in the internet to whatever length text considered appropriate by Sir Lawyer and links to whatever additional statements you have and links to critics;; all to aaqgs-append-limited texts
People should allow uncensored movies. The companies that use ANY of these productions must be skewered for ever for being pornographic in the eyes of thelinker. Likely powerful if democrat pornographic, not so if only church of Massachusetts!
aaqgs-append-limited texts on the internet is MY proposal, together with aaqgs-encryption-author to annihilate the complete caste of virus-inserting criminals that naturally extends to mal-writers in unscrupulous nexus of liberals-lawyers-politicians-journalist to be replaced by roles of aaqgs-heaven citizens.

The wikispooks link was unearthed investigating the role of Brit Sasoon, the biggest dope pusher of them all, the Bombay based opium-sheikh who abused the British might in benefiting from British-opium-subjugation and horrible-exploitation of china-population.
https://wikispooks.com/wiki/David_Sassoon

It is fascinating why this subanimal is not maligned and how press operates in internet world and what must be done to protect citizen narratives.