The problem of legacy bias

Must click links

Behind the neutral words are strongly felt issues of discrimination, its legacy, determination and management. Proper determination is critical for many individual are seen to be biased even when they are consciously not! There is the strong feeling of reverse-discrimination. That and not sudden magic, that underlies the new life in far right. Far left (communist) and far right (fascist) generate each other.

Caste differences:

Current absolution not enough: Only the stupid talk openly about domination now. Even in private, code words are used. But let us raise the deepest true concerns –

Would you be treated by a reservation doctor?

Would you live in a house designed or constructed by a reservation engineer?

Interestingly, I consider ALL doctors to be equivalently stupid unless I have no choice (when reservation status is immaterial), for example knowing about Bayesian statistics and its distinction from frequentist. Here is MY basis of difference – in frequentist, the hypothesis in a test has never any relevant history – one decides based on outcomes of test. Bayesian says history is all important, a test collects strengthening or weakening probabilities. Thus Ayurveda is mostly, but not fully nonsense, unless it has been disproved! Four things (must be more) that survive usefully are trikuta, triphala, cywanprash and Shilajit. For low frequency events, reservations do not bother me (reservation status is lot less crucial to right amount of cement!).

In other words, reservation status is far less than other cofactors. Only reason against is reverse-discrimination and applicability. First can be addressed by constitutional sunset and global-limit (50%), second means-test (easy with aadhaar, private with v-aadhaar), number of ranks and once per family.

Caste concerns are nearly applicable to sex, disabilities, special abilities (irrelevant but considered like sports) etc.

Only way to avoid status of multiple discrimination (Dalit women) is to implement a point system and aggregation rule!

The situation must be addressed by “Judge keep out” rule because it is very political. Supreme court made a 50% rule once. Thereafter this rule applies (constitutional). In any case, some states violate the rule, one (even parliament)  cannot change the structure of constitution and delete fundamental rights, answer to evil rules is admit reverse-discrimination pleas.