Feb 5, 2021
Paradigmism:
Brand-new theory as expansive as
Marxism
Probably most
bombastic ever for class, some referenced yet but use of many posted
lessons.
What is aaging so
far?
The basics is
Sinclair 2019. Then the basis is as described here. Current research
is on what I do.
Is
there any semantic logic to what you state and live by?
Yes RDS and paradigm which are basic to my life and think. Paradigm thinking is from aping the great professor Dr. Jerome Feldman. The fundamental truths
must be emergent, they can not be determined by successive process of
refinement due to the well known process of impossibility of answering
repeated 'why?' for any theory. For example, strong classic
engineering uses viscosity, temperature, resistance etc but these
mean nothing to molecules, these are emergent truths, from
statistical behavior of molecules.
RDS expands on RS
rational skepticism essential to all science which must be
falsifiable and accepted because of RS examined experiments and
observations. The critical improvement is D for double skepticism
which accepts, wrong in current belief, but nevertheless equal,
detractors of two kinds, one who are unaware of some relevant fact,
and the other created by ideology or propaganda who pretend or can't
accept a correction for intellectual or cost reasons. Preferred ways
are democratic, but secession and violence are two other alternatives
in extreme. A historian must add claim to failures that lead to these
extreme steps.
Paradigm
theory?
Paradigm divides
the world into those who feel it and those that don't, including its
introduction in 1963. When a (scientific (Kuhn restriction), social,
political etc) theory changes in paradigm sense, it is difficult for
seniors of old to see or appreciate the change and accept equality
with neophytes. In politics, one can not accept the victory of the
opposition. In India, it happened in 2000, in 2005, and 2014. About farming, one can talk of zamindari abolition, green revolution and
current shortage versus plentiful farming. One must add white
revolution (dairy) to it.
Class theory is Marxism, although Marx never invented the term class conflict, (it is how
he views history). It views every process dialectic-ally.
If you want to
name me, I prefer the term Paradigm theory with RDS for process
functioning and truth. There are two critical areas I wish to apply
it for non-intellectual personal reasons - aging (for I grow old)
and robot-ese (voice commands are here. How do I use robots without
logical errors (black box transcripts for inevitable disasters) but
not knowing logic or rigidly applying it)!
Aging
Who are the
morons?
Non-believers in
evolution. Most existing doctors without genetics knowledge.
What lays the
biological foundations?
Sinclair genetic
correction of DNA damage. Same works in all cellular life forms,
series based on size of bacteria to human to whales; and series based
on complexity of plants, animals to humans. The remarkable benefit of
theory is that aging hurts the epigenome, thus reversion to lower age
(and even looks) and potential quasi-immortality is a by product of
killing aging. That is because birth DNA is preserved pristine. Read
it in conjunction of opto-genetics, even my TBI deficits are
engineer-able and digital brain readout is possible, essential for
true immortality.
What lays the
biological correction procedures?
One is genetic,
derived from some Yamanaka factors applied by repeated punctuation.
Two is evolution based technique of Dr. Sinclair aped. Three is
plasma update. Excluded are telomere length based techniques.
Benefits of aping and plasma are likely 1 shot and 10-20 years.
Yamanaka factor derived techniques are likely always repeatable, or
at least have unknown repeat limit based on say entropy.
Making anything a
science, in particular, aging!
RDS means RS and
treatment of other people opinions. To make procedure scientific, you
need something objectively measurable. It is measured before and
after an experiment. That measure must objectively change by the
procedure. To make AAging scientific, the bioage must change
(reduction) and bioage must be correlated with rest of life to death.
Horvath pioneered bio-age, there are now other measures too. The
clock applies to many species, on a species basis. So any random guru
can make any claim. The procedure can be falsified! The only other
subrule of D is on burden of proof. It lies on the maker of any
claim! No one is allowed to make any unfalsifiable or unprovable (at
least referenced to an objective test).
Robot-ese
RDS is a
philosophy, one of many!
But unequal and
objectively superior. It is implementable to believable letters made
in online letters using my encryption technology. That is what mean
by objective in this case! Soon, you will be able to RDS test it -
try to lie to a friend or not, By putting the letter in a program,
the friend will be able to discover your lie! But that is not the reason
for RDS, which is safe efficacious robot control.
What about the future
of RDS?
Scientific people
will dispute while there are two or more. Can there be a resolution
ever? In three categories - solved (RDS), unsolvable (proved) or open
(research needed if useful). RDS will be a solution for RDS can prove
itself applying RDS! People encountering Gödel work are nonplussed
but won't be once one realizes how few they are in the real practical
world even if some simple ones in theory are!