Remarkable strides to aaquantum

I have tried to get approximate understanding of Universe I live in all my life and concluded long ago that ALL known religions (ALL major once) are criminal and the remainder of scientists don't know enough.  Where do I live? And Who am I?

Aaquantum, my dynamic belief system has one major pro and one major con – It is dynamic allied with the latest science and beyond (epistemologically possible). The major con had been “don’t know” answer to many century old questions. But in 2017, the fog is lifting in physics, as the basis of many sciences becomes clear even as we remain totally ignorant of mathematics underlying machine learning. Coherent belief, science way, is possible.

The understanding of physical basis of reality springs from increasing understanding of quantum mechanics that not only improves the ubertheories of very large of cosmology and speculative coherent cosmogeny and very small – have no known exceptions - but have not been unified despite effort by hundreds of Nobel laureates and likes for century. I even can see why the effort failed.

First better quantum mechanics. There are 4 quantum fields - three force and one mass – Higgs. Everything is a wave in one of the fields - electro-magnetics. These wavelets are emergent as particles if Higg’s is in play, or as a photon if not. Gravity is also emergent from Higg’s from entanglement!

This emergent gravity approximates Newton’s law but is different (Einstein) for speeds near light, or subtly different for astronomical events – gravitational lensing, mercury perihelion, or GPS signals. But Einstein has still a very subtle shift that evaporates with dark matter and dark energy.

Classic reason for dark matter was speed of stars in galactic rotation. In both Newton and Einstein, the force drops inversely as the area of sphere. Further away from centre a star is, slower its speed. But that is NOT what one measures! After a certain distance, the velocities become constant!

Wrong answer was dark matter, useful otherwise too.

Then the intergalactic accelerations were found increasing. Answer is dark energy of course! Has to be different than dark matter as it remained the same despite space expansion. Only possible if it were property of space itself!

Enter Verlinde and his brand of string theory. Suddenly, the idea of qubit (quantum bits) enters gravity. Verlinde casts gravity as a by-product of quantum interactions and suggests that the extra gravity attributed to dark matter is an effect of “dark energy”—the background energy woven into the space-time fabric of the universe.

Instead of hordes of invisible particles, “dark matter is an interplay between ordinary matter and dark energy,” Verlinde said. To make his case, Verlinde has adopted a radical perspective on the origin of gravity that is currently in vogue among leading theoretical physicists. Einstein defined gravity as the effect of curves in space-time created by the presence of matter. According to the new approach, gravity is an emergent phenomenon. Space-time and the matter within it are treated as a hologram that arises from an underlying network of quantum bits.

In his calculations, Verlinde rediscovered the equations of “modified Newtonian dynamics,” or MOND. This 30-year-old theory makes an ad hoc tweak to the famous “inverse-square” law of gravity in Newton’s and Einstein’s theories in order to explain some of the phenomena attributed to dark matter. That this ugly fix works at all has long puzzled physicists. “I have a way of understanding the MOND success from a more fundamental perspective,” Verlinde said.

So goes dark energy as a qubit property of space and dark matter as interaction between qubits and matter through gravity which is emergent entanglement! Amazing thing is it hangs together and brings together two hitherto unconnected concepts of entanglement and gravity together in peculiar but compelling way. Gone are the flights of fancy of the reason gravity is unlike any other force and crosses universes in the multiverse.

And why the fail in unifying three forces with gravity over last 100 years? How can you unify three quantum field with non-existent non-required quantum field for gravity! Even graviton concept is bad, explaining why it was never found.

So there is just one quantum field that became 3 due to energy – unification requires energy vastly more than TEV. Gravity is just emergent phenomenon like emergent space-time by holographic principle applied to the ultimate reality of space-time! Ultimate reality is qubits and entanglement with neutrinos, electrons, quarks and gluons. No known conflicts. Not all are explained, or can be. Why 4 fields, not 3 or 5? Why obey any laws? Plenty of research questions. Still I have reached a stable plateau! I HAVE to listen to NO religious bullshit to answer questions about my Universe!

Mark my words – Dutch Verlinde gets the Nobel Prize and will be celebrated as the new Einstein!