AAQGS-RECOGNISED DILEMMA – EQUUALITY VERSUS JUSTICE

AAQGS-RECOGNISED DILEMMA – EQUUALITY VERSUS JUSTICE

THE DIFFCULTY CAN BE GAUGED FROM THIS -

It is not possible to be pure conservative and decry rational safety-net entirely. It is also a political fact that reduction in safety net benefits are very painful to conservatives. Clearly then, tying the level to some objective indicator eliminates the politics. The ratio of tying MUST not be national but local tied to local politics.

What indicator? It is a safety net, not a goal as might be in some socialist version which I am not. At the same time, one has to contend with the problem of lawyer-likes that will PROVE that benefits to their people are insufficient. Further there is the problem of cash assistance which must never be refused, moral or not. Even specific assistance is to be carefully used. Food stamps are routinely used by aged parents of doctors who live with them. The stupidity of imposing separation opens a cultural mischief box.

The ultimate cultural unifier between US and India is discussed in conflict between ethics and law. There is no law in US mandating treatment of family as a unit, exactly like possible in India. It is also abuse the semantics in India to argue successfully for very private-only beneficial and socialistic-abuse-inefficient-supposedly-fair or briefly congress deals. Clearly we are ahead in accepting the moral cultural burden even when grossly backward in economic terms. Some ideas I have are purely local. Nevertheless many AAQGS-RECOGNISED DILEMMA are not, and transcend economics. The solution to problems of aged parents is strengthen the great system here and modify the hands-off Social security in USA.

Analysis so far indicates typing to some indicator. Obvious ones like price index sound fair but are not, for the burden falls equally and unjustly on different profitabilities. This consideration and issues of incentives, consideration of devastation of the shared commons, and easy objective of law leads to the following simple but likely very controversial idea compatible with resolutions of all dilemma so far -

1. The idea of equal vote is stupid
2. The vote is proportional to taxes paid since the previous election

All kinds of retirees, commies, on-dole etc are eliminated.

I am a great believer in restoring force model of issues, also rock and hard place or scylla and charybdis models, with ideologies the extremes. Every issue has ideological solutions correct in some neighborhood. Real systems operate at some point away. An objective system with restoring forces will become the ideologies in extreme cases but not be tied to one most of the time, instead interpolate.

Let us consider tax rates. One might assume that such elections will create governments dedicated to cutting taxes. But doing that reduces voting strength and next government will return them. What if socialists come to power? Many people will lose taxes. Only taxed will be the bad guys, who will fuck the socialist next time.

This is not far from democrat-republican tussle in USA. Democrats don't like it, but their wishes on so-called poll-funding reform has fortunately failed in supreme court, so the rich essentially have multiple votes through political ads.

Why good for India is simple – the money for ensuring multiple votes to rich is going to the biggest worst morons – owners of media, journalist and actors etc. Happens here too, less following demonetization.

By the way, the deviation model is very general. I believe that educators at all levels have a deviation percentage in taxes paid by their students. Some will succeed regardless, for example, kids of big shots but this where deviation comes in. False stupid commentary by emfubar bastards incapable of understanding deviation is expected and will be replied with very offensive language since I consider them incapable of siring any but subhuman.