Aaqgs-development – on
the issue of proven applicability
How does one prove that one system subsumes the other? simple in axiomatic systems – one shows that every axiom of one system is subsumed in the other, either as axiom or derivation. In fact, one can show two systems have equal power by showing each subsumes the other, and strictly bigger by proving that one valid subsume in one cannot be derived in the other. A more defined system may be stronger than a subsume r. For example, anything subsumes all other systems and nothing can be subsumed by any system. The real issue is useless loss of generality.
With this in mind, let us compare legal/ethical distinction with class distinction. If there are two classes a & b, one can simulate them easily by two ethics classes such that they always act as a & b! Clearly then, my distinction is at least as powerful as MARXISM. It is more whenever you are forbidden to ascribe difference in behavior for non-economic reasons, for example attitude on education in Greek or Latin. QED
People disagree on many things, not always on hidden economic reasons, some times for aesthetic reasons. One can always find economic hidden reasons by similar process as one can see penis and vagina in every line drawing or photograph. Rather than argue with such bums, better prescription is the ignore such sub animal emfubar and use contemptible language if not avoidable. NEVER show any respect beyond that required by the occasion.
A non-ideological approach to life is aaqgs-mandated. In every situation, some pre-filtering has to be done before ideological application and differences can be selected. Only time it is different when a subsumes b and both are applicable. Many problems can be answered in equivalent ways. It may indeed be a surprise, with resolution forty years in future, as the violation of Bell limits finally laid the quantum ghost of hidden variables to rest. It has taken another fifty years to combat the ghost of collapse to rest and has just begun.
How does one prove that one system subsumes the other? simple in axiomatic systems – one shows that every axiom of one system is subsumed in the other, either as axiom or derivation. In fact, one can show two systems have equal power by showing each subsumes the other, and strictly bigger by proving that one valid subsume in one cannot be derived in the other. A more defined system may be stronger than a subsume r. For example, anything subsumes all other systems and nothing can be subsumed by any system. The real issue is useless loss of generality.
With this in mind, let us compare legal/ethical distinction with class distinction. If there are two classes a & b, one can simulate them easily by two ethics classes such that they always act as a & b! Clearly then, my distinction is at least as powerful as MARXISM. It is more whenever you are forbidden to ascribe difference in behavior for non-economic reasons, for example attitude on education in Greek or Latin. QED
People disagree on many things, not always on hidden economic reasons, some times for aesthetic reasons. One can always find economic hidden reasons by similar process as one can see penis and vagina in every line drawing or photograph. Rather than argue with such bums, better prescription is the ignore such sub animal emfubar and use contemptible language if not avoidable. NEVER show any respect beyond that required by the occasion.
A non-ideological approach to life is aaqgs-mandated. In every situation, some pre-filtering has to be done before ideological application and differences can be selected. Only time it is different when a subsumes b and both are applicable. Many problems can be answered in equivalent ways. It may indeed be a surprise, with resolution forty years in future, as the violation of Bell limits finally laid the quantum ghost of hidden variables to rest. It has taken another fifty years to combat the ghost of collapse to rest and has just begun.
No comments:
Post a Comment