Aaqgs-democracy = stake-holder democracy

Stakeholder Definition

Too many existing subhumans believe in definite unique answers to great questions - birth-related abortion issues, living related what-religion issues, and death-related assisted-dearth issues. None of these great questions have definite answers, the right answer ALWAYS is stakeholder democracy prescription, that has regional and cultural divide. Aaqgs-encryption can provide the essential separation that makes it possible. Then the unique answer-er motherfuckers can be exiled from heaven and return of these sub animals can be prevented! Unless tolerance can be required and non-tolerant can be prevented from reinfection, toleration of every one is logically impossible! Toleration means intolerant ion of the intolerant! Those who are not willing to tolerate my views have no possibility of co-existence with me.

Fundamental to intolerance is the belief that no one else can have empirically testable difference of opinion. I apply to myself first. I believe in science, modern medicine and aaqgs-religion. None is by inheritance. Science means scientific method and application outside physical sciences. That leads to RP and why normal statistical error logic is wrong, while historical Bayesian logic is superior. Much harder than “what to believe” is “what not to believe”. Interestingly, “agree to disagree” does not mean quin sense, but difference in arguments. Only in the end does tolerance matter. So my religion is aaqgs, because I must know the nature that surrounds me, joyous existence, handling the aversions, semantic borderline complications like moot court resolution 

My views on modern medicine is healthy disbelief in outside the specialty and great belief in no-drug treatments like plants and exercise. It amazes me that a sickly man like myself can rationally dream of 200 year amortal life!

Which brings us to stake-holder democracy. While experiencing of plans in Delhi and Peking may make arguments, neither city has any relevance in new-york-city voting. Semantically we capture it in standing. Clearly a justifiable issue in border cases. Stake-holder democracy is a crucial concept in infinitely sub-dividable vote with multiple voting and right to recall. Computer is required and interval arithmetic redundant modes are needed for confidence and reliability. While plain aadhaar is still opposed,aa-aadhaar can be used for unabusable biological identity

Roughly, a person has a new-identity for every new transaction and only permitted correlations can exist between identities. Arbitrary admitted correlations are possible, that is why aa-aadhaar is very powerful concept.

There are very large number of voting and vote counting methods, and there exist many impossibility theorems that show that many desirable properties can not bne combined. I call them Impossibility-theorems. These are not new, thermodynamics delegates many processes to impossibility as it violates the second law. Entropy is a concept easily generalized to quantum mechanics using the concept of information. Every physical process preserves or increases information. Only time it fails is at creation time. So Impossibility-theorems exist. Faster-than-light speeds arte only possible with information transfer through entanglement!


Roughly then, Aaqgs-democracy = stake-holder democracy, and ALL known impossibility theorems like Arrow's are sidestepped, and the goal of sub-divisibility, gerrymandering, multiple votes and much-candidacy are retained.

Democracy Program

Aaqgs-democracy = stake-holder democracy

Too many existing subhumans believe in definite unique answers to great questions -birth-related abortion issues, living related what-religion issues, and death-related assisted-dearth issues. None of these great questions have definite answers, the right answer ALWAYS is stakeholder democracy prescription, that has regional and cultural divide. Aaqgs-encryption can provide the essential separation that makes it possible. Then the unique answer-er motherfuckers can be exiled from heaven and return of these sub animals can be prevented! Unless tolerance can be required and non-tolerant can be prevented from reinfection, toleration of every one is logically impossible! Toleration means intolerant ion of the intolerant! Those who are not willing to tolerate my views have no possibility of co-existence with me.

Fundamental to intolerance is the belief that no one else can have empirically testable difference of opinion. I apply to myself first. I believe in science, modern medicine and aaqgs-religion. None is by inheritance. Science means scientific method and application outside physical sciences. That leads to RP and why normal statistical error logic is wrong, while historical Bayesian logic is superior. Much harder than “what to believe” is “what not to believe”. Interestingly, “agree to disagree” does not mean quin sense, but difference in arguments. Only in the end does tolerance matter. So my religion is aaqgs, because I must know the nature that surrounds me, joyous existence, handling the aversions, semantic borderline complications like moot court resolution My views on modern medicine is healthy disbelief in outside the specialty and great belief in no-drug treatments like plants and exercise. It amazes me that a sickly man like myself can rationally dream of 200 year amortal life!

Which brings us to stake-holder democracy. While experiencing of plans in Delhi and Peking may make arguments, neither city has any relevance in new-york-city voting. Semantically we capture it in standing. Clearly a justifiable issue in border cases. Stake-holder democracy is a crucial concept in infinitely sub-dividable vote with multiple voting and right to recall. Computer is required and interval arithmetic redundant modes are needed for confidence and reliability. While plain aadhaar is still opposed,aa-aadhaar can be used for unabusable biological identity. 

Roughly, a person has a new-identity for every new transaction and only permitted correlations can exist between identities. Arbitrary admitted correlations are possible, that is why aa-aadhaar is very powerful concept.

There are very large number of voting and vote counting methods, and there exist many impossibility theorems that show that many desirable properties can not bne combined. I call them Impossibility-theorems. These are not new, thermodynamics delegates many processes to impossibility as it violates the second law. Entropy is a concept easily generalized to quantum mechanics using the concept of information. Every physical process preserves or increases information. Only time it fails is at creation time. So Impossibility-theorems exist. Faster-than-light speeds arte only possible with information transfer through entanglement!


Roughly then, Aaqgs-democracy = stake-holder democracy, and ALL known impossibility theorems like Arrow's are sidestepped, and the goal of sub-divisibility, gerrymandering, multiple votes and much-candidacy are retained.

TOE candidate

TOE stands for Theory Of Everything. It must range over every thing, in particular over 3 ubertheory, an aaqgs neologism to name three theories, howsoever strange, of which NO exceptions are known, these being Quantum mechanics QM, general relativity GR and evolution in all natural domains. Collectively, together with stoicism and semantic border, they explain nature, living and understanding i.e. aaqgs. Unification of QM and GR has been fruitlessly pursued for hundred years, string theory arose but is discard able as non-science. QFT or Quantum Field Theory exists and applies without exception but still not enough. So what is QFT? Can a non physicist gasp its meat?

In physics, a gauge theory is a type of field theory in which the Lagrangian is invariant under a continuous group of local transformations.

https://www.wikiwand.com/en/Introduction_to_gauge_theory

QFT says there is no such thing as particle. Entire universe is covered by a field. Various particles are energy packets such that on contact the waves do not mix but are elastically scattered. All physics theories are gauge symmetries, SU(1) being normal electricity to SU(3) being quantum electrodynamics. QM and GR are hyper small and hyper-large and do not mix except on black holes.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DCXasr-y8Vo

The standard model and QFT is enough to explain LHC results. No new physics has been found.
Within Tech Fi, I can imagine Faster-than-light or FTL information but not material transfer; and no reasonable sci fi can reverse this! This is because there are strong theorems that limit the velocity of ANY particle below light. However, quantum entanglement has been measured to at least 1000 times faster than light. This hope is also ignited by transference of entanglement and bomb-tester and Zeno results! Strange place to meet the Stoicism founder!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w0ztlIAYTCU&feature=youtu.be

Warning – I do not believe because I do not believe in consciousness as essential element, the moon exists even when not being watched!

Democracy in politics

Politics is a math field, say I, the successor of most illiberal is the most democratic. If you read the founding of USA, the biggest discussion in aristocratic era was between federalists(Hamilton, Madison,...) and republicans (Jefferson,...). It is between majoritarian democracy (Jefferson,...) and anti-democratic constitutional control. Switzerland is MORE democratic than USA but LESS free, they took the lead in expulsion and bigoted rules on Muslims! It is strange that US liberals now find virtues in Hamilton, the most pro-wall-street (starter) and Gold-bug ever, glorified by Nazi and Fascist! Hence my saying. P:et Km-siater wail and make evil ugly accusations re fraud!

Or this quote from Madison - Pure democracy, by which I mean a society consisting of a small number of citizens, who assemble and administer the government in person, can admit no cure for the mischief of faction. A common passion or interest will be felt by a majority of the whole, and there is nothing to check the inducements to sacrifice the weaker party or an obnoxious individual. Hence it is that democracies have ever . . . been found incompatible with personal security or the rights of property; and have, in general, been as short in their lives as they have been violent in their deaths.

Trump lost straight count but won electoral college. So did Bush jr. Happened half dozen times. Changing constitution requires 2/3 majority and is involved process. Indian SC derailed IG by inventing Fundamental Structure of constitution. Judge gates risked his life and refused the onslaught of popular revolution in Fiji against Indians in 2000, followed this brave man who refused to play dead even against a revolution! Result – Fiji thrives in 2017, despite liberal stupidities of Australia and New Zealand!

Modi is not liberal, but his opponents, open incompetence, scare me. I can not imagine A MAN DEVOTED TO CONSTITUTION to be unfree. Perhaps Sir Trump needs to learn and not criticize the Judiciary. There ALWAYS are clever work arounds.
New polls – Current UP votes WERE miscounted by exit polls. Trump, Brexit,... What goes? Allan Lichtman, a professor of history at American University, has predicted every election result since 1984 (except in 2000, when the Electoral College decided that both the popular vote and the professor should be ignored). His calculus pays no attention to polls or approval ratings; instead, it looks at the incumbent administration and asks a few very basic questions. Has there been major social unrest? Have there been disastrous foreign interventions? Has economic growth been higher or lower than in the last two administrations? If the incumbent party manages the slow decline of capitalism efficiently, they’ll win again. If not, someone else will. And in September 2016, he totted up all his columns and announced that Donald Trump would win. He didn’t quite believe it himself; in an interview with the Washington Post he was full of caveats and reservations. “We’ve never had a candidate before who not just once, but twice in a thinly disguised way, has incited violence against his opponents. We’ve never had a candidate before who has embraced as a role model a murderous, hostile foreign dictator.” In the end, it didn’t matter. Makes sense at lastt. Lets call this aaqgc-poll. Try it re end of year re Gujerat!
Mischievous Anti-Trump link

Democracy in politics

Politics is a math field, say I, the successor of most illiberal is the most democratic. If you read the founding of USA, the biggest discussion in aristocratic era was between federalists(Hamilton, Madison,...) and republicans (Jefferson,...). It is between majoritarian democracy (Jefferson,...) and anti-democratic constitutional control. Switzerland is MORE democratic than USA but LESS free, they took the lead in expulsion and bigoted rules on Muslims! It is strange that US liberals now find virtues in Hamilton, the most pro-wall-street (starter) and Gold-bug ever, glorified by Nazi and Fascist! Hence my saying. Federalists are for strong center, republicans for devolution. Modi-love not withstanding, aaqgs-me am for devolution and unequal laws by states. Thats why SAARC can become a nation.

Or this quote from Madison - Pure democracy, by which I mean a society consisting of a small number of citizens, who assemble and administer the government in person, can admit no cure for the mischief of faction. A common passion or interest will be felt by a majority of the whole, and there is nothing to check the inducements to sacrifice the weaker party or an obnoxious individual. Hence it is that democracies have ever . . . been found incompatible with personal security or the rights of property; and have, in general, been as short in their lives as they have been violent in their deaths.
Trump lost straight count but won electoral college. So did Bush jr. Happened half dozen times. Changing constitution requires 2/3 majority and is involved process. Indian SC derailed IG by inventing  Fundamental Structure of constitution. Judge gates risked his life and refused the onslaught of popular revolution in Fiji against Indians in 2000, followed this brave man who refused to play dead even against a revolution! Result – Fiji thrives in 2017, despite liberal stupidities of Australia and New Zealand!

Modi is not liberal, but his opponents, open incompetence, scare me. I can not imagine A MAN DEVOTED TO CONSTITUTION to be unfree. Perhaps Sir Trump needs to learn and not criticize the Judiciary. There ALWAYS are clever workarounds.

New polls – Current UP votes WERE miscounted by exit polls. Trump, Brexit,... What goes? Allan Lichtman, a professor of history at American University, has predicted every election result since 1984 (except in 2000, when the Electoral College decided that both the popular vote and the professor should be ignored). His calculus pays no attention to polls or approval ratings; instead, it looks at the incumbent administration and asks a few very basic questions. Has there been major social unrest? Have there been disastrous foreign interventions? Has economic growth been higher or lower than in the last two administrations? If the incumbent party manages the slow decline of capitalism efficiently, they’ll win again. If not, someone else will. And in September 2016, he totted up all his columns and announced that Donald Trump would win. He didn’t quite believe it himself; in an interview with the Washington Post he was full of caveats and reservations. “We’ve never had a candidate before who not just once, but twice in a thinly disguised way, has incited violence against his opponents. We’ve never had a candidate before who has embraced as a role model a murderous, hostile foreign dictator.” In the end, it didn’t matter.  Makes sense at lastt. Lets call this aaqgc-poll. Try it re end of year re Gujarat!

Warning - Absurd Ani-Trump.

Chemistry and Physics of Disease

Dr Doherty said medical researchers could use the device (diamond tip molecular beam at nanoscale) to weigh and identify complex molecules such as proteins, which drive diseases, such as cancer, and cures for those diseases.

"Every great advance for microscopy has driven scientific revolution," he said.

"Our invention will help to solve many complex problems in a wide range of areas, including medical, environmental and biosecurity research."

Molecular MRI is a form of the common medical imaging technology that is capable of identifying the chemical composition of individual molecules, while mass spectrometers measure the masses within a sample.

Current work is like quantum basis for sonic screwdriver in Dr. Who or tri-corder in star trek. Generally beyond, when possible at all, the limited irrational thinking of humanities writers, say I. For way better than sci fi is my tech fi. You don't imagine potentially impossible theory driven artifacts, but possible artifacts economically possible in current known or likely known science.

THE paper

Relevance  to  medicine

Hqol Longevity research

This collects views summarized from referenced papers. Rather than just “why so, says who”, interspersed are many “why not”, some times answered, some times research. Aaqgs-authoring (questions=[sub]sections). Longevity alone is not the goal; (Hqol=High quality of life) and limited predictable steps are required. Philosophy is Hqol longevity seems possible with very limited side-effects and many positive ones. So why not do a small cost (time|money) effort and listen – worst case you will know why I am wrong!

Limitations: Following pragmatic once – strictly exercise and nutrition products. The loopholes allowing plants but not chemicals. Thus pain is alleviated by cannabis plant products.

Main herb-products – stevia (for sugar), aged-garlic for reducing glycation, haldi as anti-oxidant, Glutathione (never direct for bio avail) through L-cystine. Plenty of Morons sold Gutathione supplements, soaps, cream etc. Aging view: Telomeres shortening and enemy effects long-term of once-friend chemicals. Extrapolation – absent known exceptions – Telomere shortening can be prevented without causing cancer for 200 years.

Immortality view: Not possible in bio form, but in cyborg form in 200 years including ways to transfer consciousness. The extrapolation here is on-going success in marrying senses with robotic elements for limited replacement and paralysis overcoming goals i.e. required capital is application generated. No centralized like government with war aims or venture capital sugar-daddy is needed.
200 year life-view: max needed for cyborg development; in two parts. First sixty assumes no new technology. Second 80 years by hibernation cooling. Possible to cut energy-consumption, breathing etc of human complexity by 15% max. This means time is slowed by 50% max. Humans are NOT cold-blooded, hence best is like bear with temp drop to 80;s oF and breathing cut to half rate and energy from stored form to one per 3-days. Even then 80 years max is possible, organism aging at half rate. Technology for that kind of hibernation is possible in 30 years, and requires normal life extension to 90 years using ecp, Glutathione and anti-glycation, telomere shortening prevention for anti-cancer.

A solution is assumed for all big killers – heart by anti-oxidants and anti-glycation, cancers by telomere, Alzheimer by anti-glycation, standard microbes through anti-bionics, overall by ECP directed blood flow, cheerfulness through personality changing stoicism.

I am crazy enough to believe strongly in own theories. Since 50's (age) did 100 calorie exercise and high-protein diet-control anti-glycation. Changing to 3 half hour evenly spaced 70 calorie exercise. I am right, screw the critics, proof is in my latest HgA1C (6.0), Lipid (all in range), CBC (all in range). Never have had better results. Continuation with high-protein (whey+)  mediterranean diet is easy. 
Off-nitrates so sexuality is back.

But for episodic psyche (solution - wife + adoptions, line-marriage(Moon is harsh ...)?) problems, I will live to 95 normal, perhaps 120 pushed by ECP, cancers controlled by STEM cells, normal infections by antibiotics! Possibly await hibernation just starting. And there is so much to do, crispr itself means massive targeted genetic agriculture! My niece works in a genetic-cafe in Boston – you send them a sample and they grow it! Distributed 3D print in print-cafe makes union-elimination possible, only headache of current biggies. I can happily potter around busy for next 1000 years. Time enough to think of nextthousand!