A Vital legal-political distinction

History will be kind to me, for I intend to write it.Winston Churchill

Even better is the journalist will be essentially limey!

Today I discovered wikispook, greatly admire them, have learned a lot, must incorporate wikileaks and snowden revelations, have considered essential distinction-wiki ways, do not consider their marvelous effort so far to be the final word and view the relation between wiki and wikispook to be like a project-fork and consider what will be required for a project-join. Never mind the motivations, the narrative in Wikipedia is (claim) being legally abused within the honest careful definitions by current Wikipedia team by big advertisers, polemicist and powers that be. It is needed that the identifiers of current abuses not be taken as final word either and a useful general scheme be considered for future-forks.

One way to unify, while permitting wide changes is to draw lesson from my aaqgs-lan and consider every text to be a pair – the content and the fork-set in which the text holds! At any point in perusal, all the possibilities present are considered, if only one corresponds to the belief system of the consumer, then that is followed, if none then so informed and labels of those present, while if many then click-choice presented. It immediately satisfies my complaint thst outside physical sciences, it is rare to find truth-agreement, encyclopedic-the-truth approach fails, communitarian truth makes sense, and democratic way can be constructed both to allow all truths as well perusals of convenient truths interspersed with random inconvenient truths placing a limit on such arguments. Given a population, and consumer-oriented random, inconvenient truths will statistically ignite s portion od population without snowing any one!

It is part of the capabilities of a lawyer to weigh the semantics of all words, be they explantion or explanotry expansion. In each case, the questions of semantics of who and satisfactory deistinction from congusing similar words is done. While normal people can eventually get at the answer, experience enables the answer t be produced at once. Trick is to avoid into unrequired exp-ansions, by requiring the lawyer to state the need and counter-questions which may be asked by limited-intelligence (all lawyers THINK they are smart, so have many whites to less-gifted me) which gives you time to think! Judges don't like thinkers but semi-stupid brown is tolerated. Don't forget to lace your dialog with praise of the enemy!

There is in today, an unholy unscrupulous nexus of liberals-lawyers-politicians-journalist that color information to their taste and provoke a backlash being slowly felt where they are no longer listened to and lied by general population. I interpret the steady worldwide gain of rightists in this way. People are SICK of lying politically-correct unscrupulous by-action leftists. Whta makes me very happy is that the rightists they love are increasingly visible as equally unscrupulous in social and religious matters; exactly like the rulers they rebelled against and thought they had finally overcome! This confusion is the precise god-send opportunity for aaqgs-me – socially left wing and politically right wing, only difference is the consistency and uniform sensible aaqgs-philosophy naturally left+right wing, away from right-wing hysteria but still accepting the failure of the communist-socialist model in economics. That rejection is required rejection of unionism to right-to-work, propaganda with right-to-reply etc. It is certain to make advertisers on right wince – the right-wing truth-monopoly will be sunk by right-of-reply link dedicated tax. NO ONE will be able to use any public communication media without inserting link to the unholy – perhaps expectation-of-support sorted list of links. I am strongly reminded of the famous caricature of the right wing in movie “Dr. Strangelove or: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Bomb “ https://www.wikiwand.com/en/Dr._Strangelove which had a short disclaimer by the air force at the beginning or lots of legally mandated disclaimers in colleague mails – they will all allowed to be links in the internet to whatever length text considered appropriate by Sir Lawyer and links to whatever additional statements you have and links to critics;; all to aaqgs-append-limited texts
People should allow uncensored movies. The companies that use ANY of these productions must be skewered for ever for being pornographic in the eyes of thelinker. Likely powerful if democrat pornographic, not so if only church of Massachusetts!
aaqgs-append-limited texts on the internet is MY proposal, together with aaqgs-encryption-author to annihilate the complete caste of virus-inserting criminals that naturally extends to mal-writers in unscrupulous nexus of liberals-lawyers-politicians-journalist to be replaced by roles of aaqgs-heaven citizens.

The wikispooks link was unearthed investigating the role of Brit Sasoon, the biggest dope pusher of them all, the Bombay based opium-sheikh who abused the British might in benefiting from British-opium-subjugation and horrible-exploitation of china-population.
https://wikispooks.com/wiki/David_Sassoon

It is fascinating why this subanimal is not maligned and how press operates in internet world and what must be done to protect citizen narratives.

The lovely movie “passengers”

This lovely sci fi movie is set in a spaceship full of hibernating passengers on a 100 year travel, but three passengers wakeup in ten years accidently, and the ship has no way to hibernate again! Any more will disclose the plot, but allow me to call the movie one of the best sci fi, in line with 2001: A space Odessy and Star wars, first – expands your mind, you have no idea how the plot will go even though the steps are logical and relevant, following likely accidental events.
Good fiction raises new issues not properly addressed. 2001 raised the issue of human versus AI. Star wars developed into democratic methods of establishing an empire like Hitler. Passengers is about think of re-hibernation, a technology that will defeat the movie, although then the movie will be on ship fault and re-hibernation fail at once.
Trailer:
More
She woke up 90 years too soon and she was not alone. #PassengersMovie, now available on Digital and Blu-ray.

Ironically, Passengers is at its most evocative when capturing a state of utter tedium. The Atlantic

Neither the rapport between Jennifer Lawrence and Chris Pratt nor the impressive effects can quite redeem this shallow sci-fi. Full revie
The Guardian

Pratt and Lawrence are wonderful and share decent chemistry, and Sheen adds wit, but, there's no mistaking the disturbing nature of this movie's premise. Full review
Common Sense Media

Good – meta-critic, very good IMDB. Belowaverage Rotten-tomatoes
Very Good – ME

HAPPY BIRTHDAY

Best wishes from Aroon Aryan, may my research bear fruit and this happy day come 200 years and find you as you are today

Live long and prosper

Moving to Singularity

new medicine

Living history

Enjoy yourself

Disclaimer: The information on this page and in the book, and the references cited are for information purposes only, and are not intended to treat, diagnose or prescribe for any illness or condition. For your specific diagnosis and treatment, consult with your doctor or health care provider. Only a Legally recognized Doctor can take responsibility!

Unity in Diversity or E Pluribus Unum

Is the national symbol of my nation and should be of earth, Easy to say, very hard to see how, I can and talk about it given that Shor-capable quantum-computers are still sci fi and likely to become no-go once entropy-information unification is complete and a second law of thermodynamics type no-go is formulated. In any case, post-quantum cryptography is ready and can be used against my belief in impossibility of polynomial factorization.

The idea revolves around aaqgs-aadhar which is likely practical as aadhar has been around without abuse for 5 years, aaqgs-aadhar provably does not weaken it and provably prevents abuse in the hands of business by maintenance of strict privacy and correlations between transactions of an identity. This is achieved by a new uncorrelated still-1-1-to-aadhar identity per transaction! Aaqgs-aadhar permits nested citizenship, down-to district level sub-nations, each offering regionalism, not nationalism and Unity in Diversity. Federal powers will be greatly diluted and two candidate constituencies will simplify elections and likely kill the demon of current-style-regionalism, -ve vote will destroy the extreme wings, fractional vote will help the voter, straight FPGL prevent fractured mandate etc. Clearly, I consider my self free-speech constitutional democracy conservative; 
conservative enough to believe in small government; largely playing the rolr of umpire and joint ecological action. 

Only constitution can prevent long-term shifts in evil directions. I can imagine the strong feelings against me in many southern states in last part of 19th century; against women in 1950's in USA, India today, my using constitution shield against my-called radical feminism; or my strong feelings against homosexuality today; but I let the citizens of tomorrow make their constitutional decision; I am happy to be called bigoted then. Why? Stoicism! As Aurelius “ For all things fade away, become the stuff of legend, and are soon buried in oblivion. Mind you, this is true only for those who blazed once like bright stars in the firmament, but for the rest, as soon as a few clods of earth cover their corpses, they are ‘out of sight, out of mind.’ ”. Lack of Trust in goals of my multi-generational research does not sadden me, the flag will be carried by some one else, and so on! Meanwhile, I benefit.


Strange place, perhaps, but relevant here are concepts of Aaqgs-line-marriages (sci fi = moon is a harsh mistress) and Y-chromosome inheritance. Aaqgs-marriage could be adelphic polyamory. Human DNA is XX for females and XY for male. A child inherits one from each parent. Given a mix of chains, only Y maintains identity. It is known that Y is strictly decreasing per generation, eventually boy babies will become rare! A male-driven line marriage is one that lives for ever because the male bothers keep marrying until a male is produced, who continues the line. Eldest survivor and reincorporation rules eliminates ambiguities. A Y-chromosome then has probabilistic infinite life. Note that only Y-chromosome survives distinct by copies.

What are universe can be, assuming religionist = stupid

Tech fi =physics as filter, most appropriate that can be

It does seem odd that the

multiverse keeps cropping up wherever we look. "It's proven remarkably hard to write down a theory which produces exactly the universe we see and nothing more," says physicist Max Tegmark.

Multiverse theories cannot be tested by looking for those other worlds

Even so, it is not clear that newspaper headlines will announce the discovery of another universe any time soon. Right now, these ideas lie on the border of physics and metaphysics.

In the absence of any evidence, then, here is a rough-and-ready – and frankly subjective – ranking of the probabilities of the various multiverses, the most likely first.

The patchwork multiverse is hard to avoid – if our Universe really is infinite and uniform.

The inflationary multiverse is rather likely if inflationary theory is true, and right now inflation is our best explanation for the Big Bang.

Cosmic natural selection is an ingenious idea but involves speculative physics, and there are a lot of unanswered questions.

Brane worlds are far more speculative, because they can only exist if all those extra dimensions do, and there is no direct evidence of that.

The quantum multiverse is arguably the simplest interpretation of quantum theory, but it is also vaguely defined and leads to an incoherent view of selfhood.

http://www.bbc.com/earth/story/20160318-why-there-might-be-many-more-universes-besides-our-own

Reasoned prediction RP

I have great love for and belief in application of scientific method outside physical sciences, in other words define the scientific method with objective definition (ie applicable by all, not just me). Rational skepticism is current best but I have borderline problems, two biggest being absurd applications in social sciences (will remain despite epicycles added!) and lack of statistical communitarian nature of truth (is abortion evil or not and when?).

One way to broaden rational skepticism is rational Stoicism which improves by admitting  statistical communitarian nature of truth that has to be accepted for social life. One can not pragmatically, even logically play the doubter always and refuse to accept any thing, such morons lead very troubled lives. I know because I went through that phase. The answer is in clever synthesis of the contradictions. I have found that almost all thesis are true in domination contexts where most other thesis fail. Clever synthesis is construction of context functions that reduce the other thesis discard able small in dominance intervals. For example, given choice between who is better CM, A or B, one can synthesize as 2.5 years A and 2.5 years B. If A and B are parties, the temporal ratio may depend on strength. With multi-Representative seats, as in aaqgs-democracy, coalition building is expected. I expect India to be in developed country domain in my life, plagued by centrifugal local strengths and consider  multi-Representative aaqgs-democracy essential then, to encourage nation-local coalition building. Given my dream of massive devolution, SARRC unity and very strong bio-identity based local citizenship, competition based unity is possible through aaqgs-aadhaar.

Reasoned prediction RP, not RS, is my new scientific method. Predictions can be empirical and statistical, but not yet science. An objective  reasoning process must also be given. It removes all kinds of spurious correlations present in naive science. British babies over 50 years tracked stork population in Norway! So what? Sir moron has predicted US president since 1980! So what? Its simple NP-completeness, -ve statements are easy to disprove, impossible to prove unless there is a mathematical proof.

Which brings me to biggest defeat in my life. At some point in 1985, was held a CS conference in Las Cruses, NM. Opposite sides were Dr. Dijkstra, greatest CS ever (goto
considered harmful) and me. Testing can show absence of simple bugs only, only a proof can certify, the RS (skeptic) position. Absent testing, even simple bugs only can hurt consumer, trusting program proof is and will be stupid long, the RS (stoic) position. My head was livid on arguing with his God. He went to Las Vegas, essentially blocking tenure, I to Massachusetts, never have talked since.

Predicting and Changing Behavior: The Reasoned Action Approach

Aaqgs-Religion

Why does a happy agnostic so far, need agnostic religion?

1. Expand the limits of comprehension and argumentation
   
2. Determine gaps in comprehension to make amends when possible
   
3. Comprehend more my comprehension system
   
4. Consider and evaluate ways of cheating death
   There are some constraints from my past thinking
   Science is good, social sciences stupid, humanities entertainment with NO governance impact, only needed to apploy existing rules and stand aside on need disappearence! NO one can teach you, you must empirically view rersults of processes an decide how to challenge temporal realities. I can certainly adcise on what will not work – faith, God, experience, books, irrational techniques. There are NO known empirical techniques and rare sensible extrapolations. Even sane post-death logic is hard, but you must not bow to will-free social norms!
   1. “default-OK = innocent unless proven guilty” and “default-thug = guilty unless proven innocent” are NOT definite choices but depend on the context. In general, current coreligionist gurus are considered default-thug requiring this kind of starting-defense. ALL great questions like abortion, social-laws, family-laws, religion, assisted-death etc are community based and not UNIFORM, only needing uniformity on conflict of rights. Indian constitution guarantees equality before law, but does not mandate equal;ity of sexes which can be interpreted in function equality, easily shown absurd). Thus triple divorce is unconstitutional, polygamy or polyandry is not.
   2. Right-to-reply and address-public-encryption is sufficient to permit free-speech in all contexts without requiring a court! A court and lawyers is a horrible sign of disharmony and stupidity! A system requiring these is fundamentally screwed up! The biggest reason for US and GB gains are directly caused by lack of legislation – it is fundamental to my aaqgs-think that maladies be cured by invention of uniformly available rights and government or courts step in to uniformly resolve conflicts and administration of laws. It is not a matter of faith considered ALWAYS to be the refuge of the scoundrel, but extrapolation. I have obtained novel solutions, applicable in century-21 to the problems of free speech (encryption), self-defense (activators) and democracy (none-of-above, fractional vote, right-to-recall, negative-vote, confidence&privacy which applies to voting, companies and committees!
   3. Right to defend is intrinsic to individual, group battle against groups, individual to oppression.
   4. Money is the medium of exchange. Private property rights flow from terrible mess in shared commons. Certain compromises have to be made, enforced through blind laws. Private property is based on compromise, not religions, hence must have a limit on the differences, the so-called margin-of-safety related to the average development of society and not independent of work-incentives – even marginal work needs to be respected. I strongly request the authorities to pay unemployment to garbage pickers and sorters at the very least; with incentive based payments.
   
5. 
   

1. Disclaimer – I strongly reject any attempt to relate me to God; aqnd look-down on such believers. They are often BETTER humans than me, I have NEVER encountered one with my broad range of interests and dependencies. It is the latter – abilities to uniformly extend narrow specialized betterment; typical of IAS in india; that gives me hopes of superior quality thinking and my excursions into law and philosophy that gives me the confidence of taking on professional lawyers and politicians. Modi and Yogi are outside, since I do not know what enables them to function well for decades with only 4 hour of sleep!