There are commonalities deducible from hard statistics, not
chosen. First rod then medicine Finally crime. Suggest from statistics is that
causes can be divided into controllable and uncontrollable factors; different
degrees of loss of liberty in remedial steps is involved; politicians, lawyers
and law enforcement and philosophers who do not consider liberty-loss in
suggestions upfront and fail to identify this consequence of trade-off up front
are motherfucker criminals.
They must be severally punished in my ideology which only
respects limited “no law, no crime” i.e. forbid of retroactive crime, not
prohibited but subject to “prohibited, unless necessary” like “guilty, unless
innocent” philosophy. This allows criminalization of slave-owners, tax-cheats, cigarette
companies, nazi, apartheiders etc.
Deaths happen in road accidents for many reasons. Following
is 2018 report on Yamuna expressway to agra (HT may 25, delhi). Sleep drivers =
45%. Drinking = 14%. Speeding = 19%. Traffic rules violations = 11% Mechanical
11%. Aaquantum style human = 90%, mechanical 10% (tyre burst, bad mechanics, damaged
warning, highway layout,…). Sleepy drivers, speeding, violators and drunk are
easy to fix and catch, difficult to enforce. Mechanical are difficult to catch,
easy to fix but are only 10 % of total. They also are 90% of intellectual
conversations. This is a simple example from many of why I consider
intellectuals pointless! That is 90% of class-of-75 !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
In medicine, death happens for many reasons. Following is
report. Why do people die normally? Diet? To
say that it’s little known that key crops are getting less nutritious due to
rising CO2 is
an understatement. It is simply not discussed in the agriculture, public health
or nutrition communities. At all.
Everyone has unique risk factors and causes of demise. Risks
do not add as they come with inner correlation. Risks are divide-able into
fixed and fixable. Factors like age, sex, genetics etc. are fixed.
Fixable (me) are divisible into two – measurable and
statistical. There are varying costs, pain and error rates of measures. The
proper investigation method is Very subjective and experience+SKILL dependent
with inverted-U (quality vs. experience). Perfect for AI robot or my current
mehod od scepticism unless confirmed by sens or Cochrane collaboration (not
even mm doctors say so) or journals sceptically, only if peer reviewed.
These methods work for diabetes treatment as death analysis
as buying-decisions and indicate an underlying epistemology certainly shared as
it evolves.
No comments:
Post a Comment