Responsibility-free is
possible ONLY after tenure in Academia and retirement in life.
Roughly, the goal of quality production is internally driven desire
for excellence, not the impact on affected people or systems. That
impact consideration is central to a responsible person and every
aaqgs-responslity free must consider this and express genuine
admiration for both the responsible-person and the implementation
difficulties, sometimes resulting from laughable oversight.
The best aaqgs-practices
are derived from aaqgs view of practices known at bell labs. It is
incorrect to seek more management role for the brightest –
compensate them without management titles. Ideally, the same pattern
as management but absent numerical groups being managed.
Responsible-oversight is a certain art unfamiliar with. Basic
advantages of many titles is progressive experience based advancement
of many people managed but not titular. In an ideal monetized
management, the non-responsible people can be compensated by some
fraction of development from their efforts viewed like new company
formation.
In other words, the
silicon-valley style venture capitalists in the newer angle investor
form becomes reasonable, with 1% stake of all the responsibility-free
including travel and administrative costs with a more detailed
project report due to explicitly designated responsible person.
No comments:
Post a Comment