A very important Aaqgs-discovery of summary or slogan

One can define existing-civilization by the golden rule is "not do to else what may happen to you".   I think a more realistic aaqgs-policy would be based on violent enlightened self-interest without love but surprisingly often coincides with civilized. The realist violent enlightened self-interest is "do not harm the other when it reduces their efficiency in working for you". It is superior, I think, because you can't replace else by animal (non-veg, drugs etc) and robots! That I making progress is the highest principle in me – why ain't I more aaqgs! Also no other-world are necessary, they are optional, not required for belief, ethics or law. Its application is self-defence to a legal level and organized professional defence thereafter.

Aaqgs-religion explicitly forbids conversion activity – you are aaqgs-person if you have questions that have been given stupid answers, wrapped in unpenetrable languages by emfubar who abuse your essential divineness by doing absolutely waste of prayer and live off you by soliciting contributions in various forms in lieu of their absurd teachings or visits to various sites designated holy, often in self-flagellation modes.

Having strongly denounced the conversion and exploiter subhumans, what is aaqgs and why should I spend time on it? No matter how stupid the answers, no question ever.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deductive_reasonings!

It may be provably impossible to answer, but that itself is an answer. Deductive logic is considered perfect in the sense that all conclusions from it have exactly the truth value of the axioms. However, computibility imposes limits on deductions. Every second order statement is suspect (implies quantification over sets, not just elements of a universe). But beyond, you need inductive logic that is a science, and moral logic, that is law. Very careful pronunciations have be made here since we are treading on the domain of deepest philosophers ever and future here. Fortunately, a lot of research has already been done.

By limiting to first order, no surprises like liar sentence or “set of sets not members of self” remain is not to imply that all second order are not logic, aaqgs considers some as logic on case bycase basis. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deductive_reasoning

By only considering falsifiable sentences as science, one can purge all religions. It is not to imply that all non-falsifiable are not science, aaqgs considers some as science on case by case basis. HTTP://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inductive_reasoning

Science goes beyond and uses Kuhn described paradigm model. Note thatsurvival of progress in memetic evolution is not violated in paradigmshift mode since scientists have a small life.. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philosophy_of_science

Fundamental question in philosophy of law is application. All issues of ethics are subsumed here. Note that aaqgs distinguishes between law and ethics – as laid by rulers and individual.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philosophy_of_law

It is quite moral to have felony-misdemeanor distinctions in law and cessation of prevention of recidivism efforts after a threshold.