Holoportation

Friday, October 28, 2022

Consequences of self-determination of path to immortality

What happens when one believes like me that a scientific path to immortality is possible, and the first step is taken. Let's decode this. Scientific implies only experimentally verified truths are admitted. It goes perfectly with my belief that only scientific conservatism makes welt sense. Conservatism implies true respect for the past and experience unless science demonstrates an error in belief and disruption is felt. That is enough to dismiss racism, sexism (most), ageism, and other irrelevant beliefs. Vegan or vegetarian beliefs result from self-health and not religious or cultural reasons. In fact, Inuit are welcome to their lifestyle. A scientist has the right to tell them a change is needed for health reasons, and they are welcome to ignore it. Everyone has died before me. By conservatism so must I. But that is not scientific for me!

Death is an unpleasant event in most lives. The standard response in most cases is ignoration, religionism, or legacy work. In my case, apart from the analysis of modes of failure and intelligent removal of threats, a strong consequence is to repay the debts I feel to my motherland India and my fatherland USA. Ignoration is fine. I will launch a startup in May 2023. I believe that my varying cocktail will work for most people and I will be able to offer legal insurance that 1 year of my care will reduce the customer DNAm age over 1 year. I believe that strongly since I think my gain is over 10 years, the promise of 1 year will be sound. There are few onerous requirements.

Given true retirement and no rush of time-dependent objectives, I intend to spend time advancing my convergence philosophy in which biological humans will converge in a brain-meld with cyborg parts that already advance their senses. What can be a scientific theory for such beings? Can my scientific conservatism evolve into it?

What is disruption? It is the same as a revolution but applicable to economics, knowledge, etc. It is the opposite of evolution. Evolution itself is a sequence of possible disruptions over time. Very few evolutions are disruption-free changes over a long time.

The main result for me is time to address the main difficulty in my life, TBI.

----------------------------------

https://qtxasset.com/quartz/qcloud1/media/image/2016-11/new-experiences.jpg

link to the latest

No matter how much I congratulate myself, self-clinical experience is uncommon but is a traditional method in medicine for revolutionary doctors. What makes me very different is that I am not a doctor. The disease I attack is not even considered one, aging. Subhumans deny it will be ever defeated by medicine that works for all, religion haters, and all others involved in saintly pursuits as well as ungodly like me. A chemical that defeats an illness is how medicine is defined by me after the claim that aging is a disease, and that it afflicts all humans and most animals, does not grant it the status of a natural hands-off process. My cocktail of drugs enables me to live to singularity 1 on the path to immortality. Higher singularities will not require me to the extraordinary risk I undertook and will suffer every day until 2030, my estimate of singularity. I am quite ready to be defeated, but only fighting hard for the rest of my life, dead only by unknown unknowables.

I am not done yet, conceptually after a simple test works in my mind but solidified fully in May of 2023. My simple test is my look aged to 7 total strangers. Without any dispute, they claim 50-60! If I like your reply, I will send you a recent photo of me and why I feel 50, No one believes me when I claim 68. In April of 2023, I go to the USA and submit to a DNAm test. If 50-60 I declare my method correct. I intend to hire MBBS doctors and form the first company with a DNAm test guarantee of age reduction of 1 year per year! Do it enough and be immortal, age-wise! You still die from contracted fatal diseases, accidents, or violence. But not from aging! The name itself has 1. The post-DNAm test will be 2.

Clear after my self-clinical test are these

0 Self-test is superior to clinical testing for aging medicine. Not being a doctor means no access to injections. I brilliantly (as per consequences) chose liposome everything.

1 My technique of finding dominators of hallmarks of aging is correct.

2 My claim is that the aging update chemicals are weird enough to not interact with food or medicine chemicals ingested, and seems to work for me.

3. My belief that each aging drug is indifferent to others also holds. This means that drugs for one form of aging add benefits. This is the case for eliding chemicals too. There seem to be no synergistic benefits.

4 Eliding some favorites of some doctors on grounds of some arguments on how they work and restricting chemicals that may interfere with one another seems to have worked, but may not work for others.

5 I was Covid Vaccinated 3 times and became normally sick many times. None of the medicines interfered with the aging cocktail. I was all set to stop the aging cocktail if I felt any difference. I did not. It included a penis infection from a diabetes drug.

6 While my cocktail works for me, it may not for other doctors and or patients.

The failure of the cocktail for my heart troubles, diabetes, osteoarthritis, residual brain problems, and self-examination seems to suggest four insignificant co-benefits of the cocktail. It means that the right theory of aging is medicines from four camps - topdown stem cells when E5 matures, bottom-up fix DNA/mitochondria when Dr. Sinclar 626 matures. Yamanaka factor drugs, restore immunity by growth hormone and simultaneous control of diabetes caused and fix telomere using proper HBOT dosing. Each seems to be independent of the others. Besides these, garbage collection on apoptosis ignoring dead/malignant cells using spermidine, fisetin and other similar chemicals are useful.

Thus ideal cocktail will boost AMPk and Sirutins, reduce mTOR, and boost igf-1 thus reducing mTOR proportionately, working on prolonging stem cell life and making them usable through, an HBOT-based telomere extension. Several doctors worked on small pieces and incorrectly implied that theirs the only way to understand aging. My aging theory is mine, similar to extended hyperfunction theory, and believes that there are several kinds of aging processes at once, death happens from the fastest process, and evil chemicals are healthy ones of adult life, dangerous in old age. No amount of selecting young blood will deliver magic proteins. Simple blood dilution will work.

This is only one step to immortality. Noteworthy is the conquest of most fatal cancers (kills all age-less animals), win starting through the reintroduction of lab-programmed cells, and violence through brain-upload (also ageless travel to stars).

Consequences of self-determination of the path to immortality

The main result for me is time to address the main difficulty in my life, TBI.

How to use the bounty

I have started to be a lot more cautious and greatly increased stoicism - the shit-talkers simply paint themselves with shit and can't offend me unless I am solidly protected and then I just derisively smile! The only time it matters is when the speech is directed to someone I care about and then I address the other audience.

Saturday, October 22, 2022

my experience 1

https://qtxasset.com/quartz/qcloud1/media/image/2016-11/new-experiences.jpg

link to the latest

Clear after my self-clinical test are these

0 Self-test is superior to clinical testing for aging medicine. Not being a doctor means no access to injections. I brilliantly (as per consequences) chose liposome everything.

1 My technique of finding dominators of hallmarks of aging is correct.

2 My claim is that the aging update chemicals are weird enough to not interact with food or medicine chemicals ingested, and seems to work for me.

4 Eliding some favorites of some doctors on grounds of some arguments on how they work and restricting chemicals that may interfere with one another seems to have worked, but may not work for others.

6 While my cocktail works for me, it may not for other doctors and or patients.

Consequences of self-determination of the path to immortality

The main result for me is time to address the main difficulty in my life, TBI.

How to use the bounty

Saturday, October 8, 2022

Amazon

Amazon computer buy

To all it may concern

Amazon computer buy

This is pic 3 under moving pic in amazon description, copy as above. This is what I expect. Missing are

Asus pen with tips keyboard, cover stand. Please find and send or cancel order since I think cannot compel you without effort and costs

Tuesday, June 28, 2022

Finger Vein Recognition

How It Works?

If you are a techie like me, you must know ever. This is after the 40-year-old enthralling introduction of fingerprint recognition sensors.

For those of you, who feed on tech news would definitely know what I am talking about. Yeah, the latest vein recognition sensor! This impressive bit has caused much hype into the technological world. It seems promising as a fresh approach towards cybersecurity.

After the introduction of WiFi 6, another tech breakthrough within a year seems very promising! Well enough of going on about how finger vein recognition is the new sensation let’s pour some light over what it is and how it works.

What is finger vein recognition?

Vein recognition is a relatively new biometric authentication method. It uses a pattern recognition method. It is based on the images of human veins present beneath the surface of the skin. The vascular pattern present beneath the surface of the skin is different from every individual.

The tech developers have exploited this fact and created the finger vein recognition system. This system basically uses this vascular pattern and a near-infrared light camera. It cannot be defeated by any image or reading residues.

Vein recognition method can be used to identify individuals as well as for ensuring aadhaar verification and ensuring photographs. It is between fingerprint/eye-print and DNA matching.

How finger vein recognition works?

It basically works like any other typical biometric authentication machine. By capturing the target’s image by near infra-red > processing its data > compare it to the previously stored data of that person.

Very much like our fingerprints our finger or palm veins- that are the tiny blood vessels present underneath the skin, carrying deoxygenated blood, are spread out in a very unique way.

Now, this method uses this unique pattern as an individual’s identity. It is based on the use of near infrared rays and the way the hemoglobin present within the veins reacts to it.

The deoxidized blood present within the veins can absorb infrared light. Therefore if an image of the finger or palm is taken with a near-infrared light camera, the veins present in the palm or the finger appear as a dark pattern of lines.

The system first asks to set up a parent data which is stored in the memory. The parent data contains a person’s information. This data is basically a person’s identity.

Once the data is stored, it is used to compare every time a person wants to gain access.

How finger vein recognition differs

There has been a general comparison of fingerprint and finger vein recognition method. However, finger vein recognition has more priority over fingerprint recognition.

Allow me to explain these differences to you:

· Fingerprint sensors are known to have a lower level of accuracy as compared to finger vein recognition. It is known to have a low false rejection rate and false acceptance rate.

· Fingerprint recognition requires a person to touch the device, so there is a hygiene issue to it. On the other hand finger vein, recognition is hygienic as there it doesn’t require a person to touch the device

· Fingerprint system can be affected by scars, cuts burns, wrinkles, weather or other external factors. These factors may hinder in their performance. Finger vein recognition as though works on veins which are unchangeable so there are no issues towards it.

· The fingerprint technology is known to require maintenance as constant contact with the device dirties it up. It requires regular cleaning. However, a finger vein recognition device doesn’t need much cleaning as it doesn’t need a connection.

· There are high chances of forgery as well as duplication in fingerprint recognition. This is because it leaves prints behind on the device. Due to this, it is easy to copy them and use a counterfeit. Now as finger vein recognition works on veins of a living human, it is nearly impossible to forge them.

Benefits of finger vein recognition

Biometric system of authentication is known to be the most reliable form of authentication. This method is a new era of technology. Vein recognition is, however, a definite breakthrough.

Vein recognition system comes up with some benefits which are as follows:

· Reliability

This method of biometric authentication is far more reliable as it is difficult to forge. Unlike other biometric scans which scan things that are present on the surface

Vein recognition, however, works on scanning the veins present under the skin. This scan is done only on living humans which is why it is nearly impossible to forge it

· Hygienic

Vein recognition is a contact-free method. That means a person is not required to make contact with the device for the scan to go through with.

This is why this method is much more hygienic as compared to other touch-based systems.

· Low Maintenance

As this technology requires less or no contact with the device. In other authentication methods, a person is required to touch the device.

In finger vein recognition as it is contact-free, therefore it is not necessary to clean the equipment at regular intervals.

· Remains unaffected by external factors

Factors like age, wrinkles, weather, etc. can not affect the performance of a vein recognition system. This is because it is a subdermal type of technology that means it remains uninfluenced by wet or dry weather.

Wrinkles appearing on hands and skin can also not affect this method as it works on the veins which remain unchanged throughout life.

Disadvantages of finger vein recognition

Everything is known to have advantages as well as disadvantages. As I am to provide an unbiased view, so let’s have a look at its cons:

· As this method is relatively new, so the technology is expensive. Due to this, it is only accessible to a few companies and organizations

· People suffering from arthritis cant use it as they can’t balance their limbs properly. Also, it would be difficult to place their hand on the scanner.

· This technology is still not that reachable to the world, and some cultures refuse to use it.

· It uses veins for identity. This could cause some people to be apprehensive about it.

Parting words

Hyped up about this technology? This fascinating bit is indeed intriguing and is something I wish gets available in the market soon. Even its advantages outweigh its disadvantages.

Monday, June 20, 2022

Arun Diet

To who it concerns

Rest is a summary of what is my diet. Purposes at the start are to select dishes for the benefit of RD to allow them to figure out calorie consumption of 1900 per day and ensure 60 gm of advised protein per day for a diabetic heart patient.

Essential is my strong belief of aging requires intermittent fasting and diabetes same time. I wish to go from a light dinner for good numbers of sugar every morning to intermittent fasting of 16 hours and a full fast 1 day per week.

Breakfast

oats milk with 10 gm egg white powder + 10 gm whey +

10 gm almond powder + 2 wall-nuts + 2katora lowfat milk

10 am snack

small apple + seasonal fruit + tea

Lunch

1katori each (dal + seasonal veg + curd) + 1 roti

4 pm snack

3 Marie-biscuit + 3 spoon cheese-ling + tea

7 pm dinner

1katori (lauki-etc + curd) + 1small-roti + 1katora lowfat milk

Monday, May 16, 2022

ÚLTIMA NUEVA TEORÍA SUPERIOR y DESHACER DEL ENVEJECIMIENTO

último enlace

https://youtu.be/rLD-8UhHEZM

La imagen es un video en el que se puede hacer clic.

estructura de edad de la población

https://youtu.be/2EvYU-HmsvI

Después de 7 años después de 2015, dedicado a tiempo completo al estudio del envejecimiento y al análisis profundo de la ciencia para desentrañar el empirismo y la erudición, estoy listo para anunciar que tengo una nueva teoría superior y una estrategia sólida para deshacerla. Sé que la parte de deshacer es correcta ya que está validada, aunque no empíricamente por la FDA, por autoaplicación y casi 1000 pacientes durante seis años por

Alan S. Verde MD

Calle Westmoreland 44-01,

Pequeño cuello, Nueva York 11363

(347) 255-3944

alangreen225@gmail.com

https://youtu.be/Ts72rIBVbBk

Le creo solo por 1 razón, ha usado la receta en sí mismo y en pacientes (700-1000) durante seis años y tiene informes entusiastas (ahora tiene 78 años, comenzó con 72, se sintió bien después de 3 meses). Además de la autoaplicación, considera que los matemáticos y los informáticos, no los biólogos y los médicos, son mucho más adecuados para el envejecimiento. ¡Qué hallazgo milagroso para mí!

Todos los demás que no puedan demostrar que estoy equivocado, incluidos los tribunales, la policía, etc., y en particular los médicos, ¡váyanse al infierno! Lo pruebo yo mismo, aquí o en el extranjero. Continuaré con los médicos que me creen, para lanzar la terapia de envejecimiento en el lateral, con objetivos inmediatos de singularidad 1.0.

Mi teoría es la teoría composicional del envejecimiento: recopila varias teorías del envejecimiento como correctas al mismo tiempo, tal como lo prueban los relojes de ADNm, y refleja el envejecimiento de diferentes sistemas corporales, de 3 clases amplias que se programan de arriba hacia abajo para detener los efectos de mTOR , de abajo hacia arriba en torno a los factores de Yamanaka y la adversidad saludable como la restricción dietética, y la extensión de los telómeros basada en el uso de oxígeno hiperbárico intermitente. Creo en términos teóricos que los métodos mTOR de arriba hacia abajo y los métodos de Yamanaka de abajo hacia arriba se pueden reutilizar varias veces y tendrán una prioridad mucho mayor. La extensión de los telómeros rara vez será material.

Envejecimiento hiperfuncional: quién ordenó el envejecimiento humano (aparte de un dios jodido)

https://youtu.be/hyXH_m5a3NE

Comprender la evolución del envejecimiento en humanos: el envejecimiento es uno de los grandes logros de la biología. Entre vertebrados; peces, anfibios y reptiles tienen NS de senescencia insignificante. El problema con NS es que los animales pueden descubrir cómo vivir demasiado tiempo. Este es un problema en un mundo cambiante y dificulta la evolución de nuevos rasgos porque la cría y el acervo genético están entonces dominados por animales mayores y más grandes dentro de la especie, en particular los campeones de la cadena alimentaria. Este problema fue resuelto por los mamíferos recién llegados hace unos 180 millones de años. La solución fue matemática pura. Los animales crecían rápido, se reproducían durante algunas generaciones y luego morían. El efecto de poda de la muerte de animales mayores brindaría espacio para que la nueva generación prospere y tenga el potencial de introducir variaciones genéticas favorables. El problema era que los animales se habían vuelto demasiado buenos para descubrir cómo vivir mucho tiempo. La solución fue una píldora venenosa integrada en el código genético. Los animales con la píldora venenosa de repente comenzarían a envejecer y morirían. Los animales sin la píldora de veneno vivirían más tiempo y solo sufrirían una muerte estocástica o una muerte no relacionada con el envejecimiento. 180 millones de años después el ganador es claro. Todos los mamíferos terrestres eligieron la muerte senescente y programada. En el pasado, durante 180 millones de años, los peces, reptiles y anfibios se han mantenido insignificantemente senescentes y les ha ido razonablemente bien. Sin embargo, no han cambiado mucho; mientras que los mamíferos han hecho avances extraordinarios.

Comprender el envejecimiento es fácil si su campo son las matemáticas puras o los programas informáticos; sin embargo, parece casi imposible si su campo es la biología. Desafortunadamente, la teoría del envejecimiento fue desarrollada por biólogos y no por matemáticos o programadores informáticos, y el biólogo se equivocó por completo. Hoy en día, una teoría del envejecimiento está dominada por un campo que se autodenomina "Biología del envejecimiento". Su teoría es que el envejecimiento no tiene valor, ningún gen promueve el envejecimiento, y el envejecimiento en humanos es esencialmente lo mismo que envejecer en objetos inanimados, como un zapato viejo o un auto viejo. En resumen, la teoría del envejecimiento se fue por la madriguera del conejo.

Para entender el envejecimiento; compara un cocodrilo de 100 años con un humano de 100 años. El cocodrilo de 100 años es un animal extremadamente robusto; más grande y más fuerte que el cocodrilo de cincuenta años, sin mostrar signos de envejecimiento. Esto está en marcado contraste con un humano de cien años. Los mamíferos terrestres, incluidos los humanos, son animales senescentes, mientras que los reptiles, como los cocodrilos, muestran una senescencia insignificante NS.

La senescencia es un programa de muerte intencional que utiliza el envejecimiento programado. El plan es hacer que los mamíferos se deterioren y mueran. Esto crea más espacio para la nueva generación. La idea es que la nueva generación pueda tener nuevas mejoras genéticas y el objetivo del envejecimiento es eliminar a los animales más viejos para que sus genes no dominen el acervo genético. Todo es un gran plan para desarrollar mejoras genéticas. El plan es pura matemática. Animales sin mucho éxito en el desarrollo de mejoras genéticas a lo largo de los siglos.

Sunday, May 15, 2022

LATEST NEW SUPERIOR THEORY and UNDO OF AGING

Understanding the Evolution of Aging in Humans: Aging is one of the great accomplishments in Biology. Among vertebrates; fish, amphibians, and reptiles have negligible senescence NS. The problem with NS is animals can figure out how to live too long. This is a problem in a changing world and makes it difficult to evolve new traits because breeding and the genetic pool are then dominated by older and bigger animals within the species, particularly food chain champions. This problem was solved by the newly arrived mammals some 180 million years ago. The solution was pure mathematics. Animals would grow up fast, reproduce for a few generations and then die. The pruning effect of the death of older animals would provide space for the new generation to thrive and have the potential to introduce favorable genetic variations. The problem was animals had become too good at figuring out how to live a very long time. The solution was a poison pill built into the genetic code. The animals with the poison pill would suddenly start aging and die. The animals without the poison pill would live longer and only suffer stochastic death or non-aging-related death. 180 million years later the winner is clear. All terrestrial mammals chose senescent and programmed death. Over the past, 180 million years fish, reptiles, and amphibians have remained negligible senescent and done reasonably well. However, they have not changed very much; while mammals have made extraordinary advances.

Understanding aging is easy if your field is pure mathematics or computer programs; however, it seems to be nearly impossible if your field is Biology. Unfortunately, aging theory was developed by Biologist and not Mathematicians or Computer programmers and the Biologist got it totally wrong. Today, an aging theory is dominated by a field that calls itself, "Biology of Aging". Their theory is that aging has no value, no genes promote aging, and aging in humans is essentially the same as aging in inanimate objects, like an old shoe or an old car. In short, the aging theory went down a rabbit hole.

To understand aging; compare a 100-year-old crocodile with a 100-year-old human. The 100-year-old crocodile is an extremely robust animal; bigger and stronger than the fifty-year-old crocodile, showing no signs of aging. This is in sharp contrast to a hundred-year-old human. Terrestrial mammals, including humans, are senescent animals while reptiles, like crocodiles, show negligible senescence NS.

Senescence is an intentional death program using programmed aging. The plan is to make mammals deteriorate and die. This creates more space for the new generation. The idea is that the new generation may have new genetic improvements and the goal of aging is to remove the older animals so their genes do not dominate the genetic pool. It is all a grand plan to develop genetic improvements. The plan is pure mathematics. Animals not highly successful in the development of genetic improvements over the ages became extinct.

Aging is a way to give animals a relatively fixed life span and then prune them. Aging Is the secret to the success of terrestrial mammals. A poison pill in the plan for genetic improvement.

Forewarned is forearmed. Once you know your body is running an ancient genetic program to kill you; then you have a chance to turn off the death program. Successful anti-aging medicine is about the discovery of pro-aging programs and finding ways to block these programs. The chief culprit is mTOR, particularly mTOR2. All non-critical aging chemicals have an important role - even reducing the main aging has some effects and legacy effects that may not rise to critical but are still implicated in health decline. thus compositional aging means all factors need to be addressed, only duplicated effect producers can be ignored

What is science?

Ultimately. operable definition of science is scholarship constrained to empiricism alone. Pure objective empiricism is NOT science as a collection of chosen unrelated facts is pseudoscience! 99% of well-adjusted viewed intelligent engineers have zero offering in non-specialization orthogonal subjects. I know it well from watching my father who was number 1 in disaster topics but very poor in business subjects, most products, and politics.

A theory becomes science when it correctly predicts an easy-to-see orthogonal subject. As a computer scientist, I add a clever requirement to usual philosophical points, the predicted phenomenon must be a non-polynomial extrapolation to all data used. An interpolation point result can be obtained by standard numerical science methods.

Science must be refutable! It must be empirical. My claim to "LATEST NEW SUPERIOR THEORY and UNDO OF AGING" must be empirically established. Till then, it is a theory, better than all others with documented applications.

Why computer science?

I have no reason advanced by the Good doctor. I state things that are to difficult answer by biologists and chemical scientists. How can one answer completion questions? In other words, collect all methods that are likely to result in bio-age reversal and more important determine the consequences of repeated use of age reversal.

singularity?

For my purposes, I consider Singularity in 4 parts. Everyone is likely to undergo all of them,

Singularity1.0 is an extension of healthspan without the necessary increase in lifespan. There are many reasons for it including the reduction in the severity of chronic age-related chronic diseases and survival to singularity2.0 to enjoy their benefits. It has started, and singularity2.0 is expected to arrive by 2030.

Singularity2.0 is proven to increase a healthy lifespan. Since life-span increases, the singularity3.0 is the point to which the extension is needed. It is likely that singularity3.0 arrive by 2050. There are 8 years to singulrity2.0, all the methods needed are available in the non-proven form, and enough josh is available to reduce the costs of therapies for use by limited-corrupt or advanced states.

Critical to my thinking are societies like India. The fact that India was biological backwaters to 2 years back, but developed vaccines, their huge production, and distribution, speaks volumes about limited corruption, excellent politics, enormous intellectual energy, and advancing commerce. In India, we have, in mythology, the dream of a Ram-Rajya. I have no doubt in my mind that Modi-Yogi will lead to the first Modi-Yogi Rajya which provides the first life, free of the horrors of chronic diseases, and an extended healthy lifespan. There is no doubt in my mind that they will become as central to Indian culture as Ram-Rajya.

Singularity3.0 is expected in 2050. By definition, it will provide a healthy life extension of 1+ years per year for 500 years. You will still die from accidents and murder, but not from senescence. It is not too much to ask since there exist animals without senescence for this goal and trees that live 5000 years. That lifespan is possible for a normally not-unlucky careful person.

Singularity4.0 happens 500 years when brain-download becomes possible. Accident and crime deaths are eliminated then by brain download and redundancy safety. Assuming limited natural effects, one can live for trillions of years and roam the universe without travel boredom despite light-speed limits since traveling photons do not feel the path, and time increment is zero for them!

Singularity5.0 happens trillions of years later. Some smart Ph.D. theses will collectively lay the foundation for exiting the current universe and going anywhere in the multiverse.

My aging theory

Simplistic overview of aging theories

Algorithms can solve a problem in top-down or bottom-up manners, like a manager or a scientist. The problem of aging can be understood by top-down hyperfunction, or bottom-up DNA fix errors reduction. From our viewpoint, a body is made up of trillions of identical cells specialized to current existence by folding and unfolds of the DNA.

As time passes, errors in DNA show up in mRNA or the cell even forgets what it is. Either case, it turns senescent and a source of further problems. Cells have other communications too, like commands from exosomes or secretions of hormones. These are in addition to blood-derived chemicals from near neighbors. The exosome makes the sender behave like a hormone production organ. Top-down E5 likely improves stem cells for building senescent cells using exosomes to restart youth-like stem cells frozen from lack of orders.

What is death?

Death is a cessation of function. It is easily understood by analogy with a car going to a destination. After the setup is done, the car goes into a freeway and can drive fast. Near the destination, it exits the freeway to normal speeds. But bio-systems do not reduce speed. The car travels normal roads at a bad speed and winds up dead in an accident. Meanwhile, the car rusts. In most cases, it is totaled. In rare cases, rust gets it eventually. we can draw multiple lines under the process of transport. Disruption can occur in transport due to one of many causes, each with a probability that is itself a function of time, For a car is totaled with about the same speed but rusting death becomes more probable with time. One proof is the nearly constant annual probability of death from all causes past 80.

mTOR

As I remarked, mTOR is a fascinating puzzle. (must read).

Unlike Sirutin, AMPk, and igf-1, which reduce aging on a boost, mTOR increases aging and is boosted by every boost in technological evolution. All good modernities cause accelerated aging. They include better food, better communication, screened devices, time savers, you name any modernity and it increases aging, To improve aging, you must fast repeatedly, joint ice-water/steam bath, whole morning shirtless bare chest walk in snow mountain, etc. Healthy adversity is good.

What is hyperfunction solution - 6mg rapamycin every week once. Controls mTOR, has no FDA test yet, can't be wrong given Dr, Green, stupid for all without being his patient, can choose an MD by clicking on the link when there. I suggest boosting Sirutins and AMPk on the side and doing singularity1.0 also. All the other steps are from Dr. Sinclair and ensure health bottom up even as hyperfunction ensures mTOR!

Composition of methods?

There are many processes of Aging. They are all progressing in parallel. One can divide the aging undo methods into 3 classes -

1. small increment in lifespan but larger in healthspan. These include boosts. senolytics. Kennedy. Fahy.

2. some increments in lifespan but substantial healthspan, a limited small number of reuses. Senolytics. Sirtuin and AMPK boost.

3. Repeated reuse possible. Yamanaka factors, E5, rapamycin

#1 is good for singlarity1.0 #2 is good for singularity1/2, and #3 is good for singularity 1/2/3. Being healthy old requires lesser aging fixes, so start early in all methods.