A general aaqgs-trademark scheme

Given that the trademark part of USPTO is aaqgs-criminally responsible to torturous behavior towards TBI-sick me, unrelieved as lacking in funds then and statuary time limitation now; it is terribly important to me to invent a scheme that makes at least that section irrelevant and then trash its employees of wasteful unnecessary people.

There is important cryptography insight, one internet insight and two physics insights that make this revenge possible. Given its scope, it will do banknotes, articles and what not – enough to emfubar the sub animals.

The cryptography insight is - there is NO solution to base ^ power % mod = value when all but power is known. It becomes even harder if mod is not known as well.
The internet insight is - it is possible to completely shield a computation in clouds, returning the answer within micro-seconds sand transparently increase the computers responsible for identical computations proportional to paying load.

One physics insight is – quantum dots embedded in pillars by self-assembly process are quantum randomly placed.

Another physics insight is – under uniform strain, the dots photo-luminescence changes. A french group has already developed technology to determine the dot positions thus.

https://physics.aps.org/synopsis-for/10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.117401

Application:
Given the results, consider the deposit of such a substrate on any article. The dots vector forms a random large number from which an unknown subset is selected but the digital root of the selectin is recorded.

On the internet using clouds are sent the measurements and the digital root. A process remotely selects bits based on digital exponentiation to unknown power. Bits from measurements are subset based on this result, and the number is discret powered again to another unknown power (selected by the class of goods being protected). The result is sent back with ant-hack bits. After decode, it must be the same displayed on the article.

Why does it work?

1. Even trillion-trillion collection of pairs of (number printed, result expected) can be used to decode values hidden
2. Reuse of a valid number pair elsewhere is prevented by requiring same quantum dot pair elsewhere which is impossible due to uncontrolled quantum randomizing!
   

Electron Pulses Made Faster Than Atomic Motions

<sub>Every major advance in microscopy has resulted in revolution in medicine and production. It has allowed the scientists to visualize their current models from gedanken theoretical to experimental empirics. For example, the cutting edge state-of-art in heart care for me is radiation imaging of probes moved inside my heart i.e. angiography is the gold standard in heart diagnosis ans real-time ballooning, stents placement, and artery/vein manipulations. So what can do better than electron-beam scanning?



Turns out that atoms constituting a bond for anything fluctuate at 20 femtoseconds, Even the fastest H-binds (organic chemistry) at 10 femtoseconds. If electron trains can be developed faster than 10 femtoseconds, processes in any area can be still photo graphed, even femtosecond movies. That has been done!



The beam energy has to be large, so even in US, the labs are tied to reactors in department of energy like los alamos, sandia and lawrence livermore. Better known for weapons, one might wonder at the incentives to do cutting edge medical work! Yet they do and USA universities are way behind mostly. But not for long! Faster electron trains at lower energy levels is exciting area of research with no no-go-theorems to block path yet.



https://physics.aps.org/articles/v10/39</sub>

Last man standing

How can a man die better, 

Than facing fearful odds, 

For the ashes of his fathers, 

And temples of his gods.

A professional army quits with 2-3 casualties per 10, major Shaitan Singh died last day, after 114 ahir from 123 from rewari, Harayana died, fighting the Chinese in Rezang La, Laddhaqe in 1962, for which awarded PVC, posthumous. 

 Only motivation beyond professional is when you fight for your people or when convinced the enemy will mistreat you. So the horrible tom-tom of propaganda, highlight of genuine torture cases and interrogations; to convince professional army soldiers of expected maltreatment, soldiers in denial mode of such stories and no propaganda need for real causes like the regiment that sacrificed itself. 

So important was this sacrifice that if we have any part of Laddaque, it is because of this supreme sacrifice that blocked the advance of Chinese for rest of war, apart from judicious route inflicted in the battle.

To the sacred memory of the Heroes of Rezang La,
114 Martyrs of 13 Kumaon who fought to the Last Man,
Last Round, Against Hordes of Chinese on 18 November 1962.
Built by All Ranks 13th Battalion, The Kumaon Regiment

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rezang_La


'Nobody believed we had killed so many Chinese at Rezang La. Our commander called me crazy and warned that I could be court-martialled'". Retrieved 26 November 2014.

Creation time

Why is there far more matter than antimatter in the observable universe?

Prelude – above is a strict physics question but for me, central to my aaqgs-religion for stoicism (from s) requires you to first draw a map of the terrain before applying ethics to it. The conflict between stoics (Believers) and epicureans (atheists) is at least 2000 years old in greece. After this, I venture forth as agnostic but still needing religion to answers my doubts in ethics and my future using an epistemology from science alone, considering traditional inherited, stupid-tome or irrelevant experience based epistemology subhuman even when their believers are equal to me, often less-trroubled and ethically superior to me. It is their belief that are shit and if they shared my intellectual journeys, they would think like me or better.

I find mysef a member of family, from a villaage, in a nation on a planet. When I venture out, I see the moon, Sun and stars. I seek to know about them but I consider many accounts to be shit. Accounts that do not pass thgrough my epistemological filters are certainly shit. Even those passing are considered shit unless they are consistent with many others. Prestidigitation is assumed if the accounts conflict with no go theorems. Not much is left after these philosophical filters, but enough to yield very effective existential nqarrative of life as social scientific animal that can understand the progression to life through evolution. 

But where did the universe come from? What happened at big bang time, or do we have to invent the concept of God who disappeared after big bang? Narrative consistent with agnosticism and opposed TO ALL Religions but my aaqgs!

But then why did not the matter and qaantimatter destroy each othe

_{- In the first few moments of the Universe, enormous amounts of both matter and antimatter were created, and then moments later combined and annihilated generating the energy that drove the expansion of the Universe. But for some reason, there was an infinitesimal amount more matter than anti matter. Everything that we see today was that tiny fraction of matter that remained.}

But why? Why was there more matter than antimatter right after the Big Bang? Researchers from the University of Melbourne think they might have an insight.

Just to give you an idea of the scale of the mystery facing researchers, here’s Associate Professor Martin Sevior of the University of Melborne’s School of Physics:

“Our universe is made up almost completely of matter. While we are entirely used to this idea, this does not agree with our ideas of how mass and energy interact. According to these theories there should not be enough mass to enable the formation of stars and hence life.”

“In our standard model of particle physics, matter and antimatter are almost identical. Accordingly as they mix in the early universe they annihilate one another leaving very little to form stars and galaxies. The model does not come close to explaining the difference between matter and antimatter we see in the nature. The imbalance is a trillion times bigger than the model predicts.”

If the model predicts that matter and antimatter should have completely annihilated one another, why is there something, and not nothing?

The researchers have been using the KEK particle accelerator in Japan to create special particles called B-mesons. And it’s these particles which might provide the answer.

Mesons are particles which are made up of one quark, and one antiquark. They’re bound together by the strong nuclear force, and orbit one another, like the Earth and the moon. Because of quantum mechanics, the quark and antiquark can only orbit each other in very specific ways depending on the mass of the particles.

A B-meson is a particularly heavy particle, with more than 5 times the mass of a proton, due almost entirely to the mass of the B-quark. And it’s these B-mesons which require the most powerful particle accelerators to generate them.

In the KEK accelerator, the researchers were able to create both regular matter B-mesons and anti-B-mesons, and watch how they decayed.

“We looked at how the B-mesons decay as opposed to how the anti-B-mesons decay. What we find is that there are small differences in these processes. While most of our measurements confirm predictions of the Standard Model of Particle Physics, this new result appears to be in disagreement.

In the first few moments of the Universe, the anti-B-mesons might have decayed differently than their regular matter counterparts. By the time all the annihilations were complete, there was still enough matter left over to give us all the stars, planets and galaxies we see today.

_{After decay of anti-matters still they were active in the universe against matter and new particles in combination would be generated when both collide to get mutual destruction. However mesons are particles with negligible mass and they act .}

In the first few moments of the Universe enormous amount of both matter and antimatter? What was before the Universe? These particles must have come to be how? Before the big bang, what was there and where did it come from? This also beg the question when does time begins? 

Is the Big Bang just a period in time?

what was before the big bang is still a BIG question for physicist...

Many of yours questions are still questions....so it is the region of theory which was based on assumption.

I believe ASSUMPTION is what blurs the lines between Science, Filosophy, and Theology. But such are the facts. There is nothing we can do but assume. Therefore the tug of war between science and religion will forever exist. For who is to say who is right?

A Two hundred year life

BBC says it too!

It is my strong belief that it is possible, can be achieved in normal ways, and lead to indefinitely longer life. I am perhaps a month early to Musk who indepently discovered the main idea to indefinite life and researches in the new company Neuralink!

A friend objected to the wish for Two hundred year life on grounds that it would be tiring. Another on grounds it was wished but never shown! How could even that be done, let alone indefinite life!
My plan calls for only 200 year biological life, since the indefinite future life is as an cyborg. I assume that Neuralink or competitor would be successful by end of 21^st century to middle of 22nd. The Real issue is life extension till then. Physical prowess or looks are unimportant then. But physical health and vigor is crucial to live to 120. Means the next required step be done in next 60 years. The last 80 years or longer are from hibernation or advances using tested medicine improvements.

The wish for and research in life extension is as old as humanity as are nay-Sayers who say it can't be done. It is extremely easy to be emfubarred by products with anecdotal even statistical backing. So what then?

Aaqgs-epistemology: Easy for me <TBD why these> – only trust unhackable endorsements by trusties. No need even to argue who there – if any more, their judgments and org will be endorsed by the basic! WHO TRUST in an arena of 99% subhuman-equivalent thugs and ALL adsters? British cochrane and sens. None from USA including CDA.

There is plenty of aaqgs-stupid stuff floating around like this. If you draw natural conclusions here, you join the rank of aaqgs-gone-case-subanimal!

My program – self-applied first - is derived from many ideas

1. People have a tendency to lie, reinterpret, be manipulated. Any majoritarian democractic science is absurd.
   
2. Anecdotal science is always very suspect.
   
3. Statistical data is very easily abused. Only documented and paid counter-experiments are needed. CDA is too easily manipulated in difficult areas.

As we understand the underlying unity of disease mechanisms (major are insulin caused glycation, telomere shortening and free radicals), it makes sense to adopt following plan

1. Ordinary physicians, ECP,  diet and exercise for 95 age.
2. Extra-ordinary in-pipeline meds from age-specialists next 25 years
3. Hibernation or sci fi meds next 80- years
4. Transmission to electronic brains end 21 to mid 22 century
5. Anti-fragile thereafter

Controversy begins

Eukaryote and prokaryote

In nature over all species (bacteria – mammals) are found two kinds of cells – AA-eukaryote is any organism whose cells have a nucleus and other organelles enclosed within membranes. Eukaryotes belong to the taxon Eukarya or Eukaryota; prokaryote have sackless cells, only very low in animal world. DNA is part of nucleus and crucial because of its need in relevant protein synthesis. Prokaryotes multiply by fission.

Even though simple, the prokaryotes may have a wiggly organ outside the cell, allowing it some motion. It helps a lot in making a bacterial film which has even some intelligence by stigmergy!


Why do these entomological terms make sense?

1. They need to be understood for the essential point very difficult for hierarchical human minds to digest - Non-intelligent-id evolution with emergent intelligence!

2. Absolutely needed to understand swarm-intelligence in AI and also emergent reliability and emergent functionality! Human body can fight microbial diseases without intelligence and low level of intelligence (vaidya or hakim or shaman systems) to emergent anti-disease.

Fascinating insights emerge from study of tree-cell from trees with 4000 year life-span - it is difficult to believe  these cells have undergone so many divisions and restorations without sickness!

Outline of new concepts past dakiyanoos of 1975

First short article, then expand, collect in a book. First of blockchain, stigmergy, black swan, Antifragile, bayesian statistics, forensic image analysis, IBE cryptography, cp completeness, quantum physics, responsible letters, hypersocial beings, envy-free cake division, trapping forgers. I suspect our group fairly represents the best minds of India 75 and most will apologies over (under half the list).

If you became adult in 1970s, many fundamentally hard new concepts have to be learned to have even some idea of new world, if you have experience managing people, it is a waste. What is it that such a powerful statement makes sense – it is that decentralised control, very hard, but is still possible in many areas, like economics, government, administration, economics etc, that was not possible for before three thousand years. Past can be captured very well as analog of UNIX file system with links – hierarchies with symbolic and hard links. It gives rise to the wonder of Microsoft and client-server computing that describes the last 25 years and the rise of internet. It fails in the world after 2010, past to die by 2025.



The first very powerful idea is a block-chain, which can be viewed as a decentralized distributed database. You may have heard the term ‘blockchain’ and dismissed it as a fad, a buzzword, or even technical jargon. But I believe blockchain is a technological advance that will have wide-reaching implications that will not just transform the financial services but many other businesses and industries.

In money like bitcoin, a needed minimum of distribution, I call quorum, is ensured by these kernel elements being there by the idea of mining, where the elements benefit monetarily by discover, even while the computation maintains the transcripts in devolved ways. Cheating is prevented by suicide in search by cheating, error-freedom by majoritarian decision making safe against majority of cheaters, mining limited to a theoretical maximum and NO known ways to mine except by linear search. Net result is a minimum of transcript keeper who don't cheat for self-interest and whose decision-making is by majority. Excellent but for one thing – near impossible to change! I have built a way around. When aaqgs-bitcoin is created, after suitable anonymity is achieved, with slow change possible.
Blockchain-bitcoin is just a start.

Blockchain technology continues to redefine not only how the exchange sector operates, but the global financial economy as a whole.” –  Bob Greifeld, Chief Executive of NASDAQ

“In financial markets there’s always a mechanism to correct an attack. In a blockchain there is no mechanism to correct it — people have to accept it.”- Robert Sams, founder and chief executive of London-based Clearmatics.

“Blockchain technology has the ability to optimize the global infrastructure to deal with global issues in this space much more efficiently than current systems.” – Marwan Forzley, Founder of Align Commerce

A blockchain is a public ledger of all bitcoin transactions that have ever been executed. A block is the “current” part of a blockchain which records some or all of the recent transactions, and once completed, goes into the blockchain as permanent database. Each time a block gets completed, a new block is generated. Blocks are linked to each other (like a chain) in proper linear, chronological order with every block containing a hash of the previous block. To use conventional banking as an analogy, the blockchain is like a full history of banking transactions. Bitcoin transactions are entered chronologically in a blockchain just the way bank transactions are. Meanwhile, blocks, are like individual bank statements. The full copy of the blockchain has records of every bitcoin transaction ever executed. It can thus provide insight about facts like how much value belonged to a particular address at any point in the past. Some developers have begun looking at the creation of other different blockchains as they do not believe on depending on a single blockchain. Parallel blockchains and sidechains allow for tradeoffs and improved scalability using alternative, completely independent blockchains, thus, allowing for more innovation.

gyft, an online platform for gift cards where you can buy, sell and redeem gift cards.

 Chain to offer gift cards for SMBs using blockchain.

Forbes info for investment-level idiots!

Current money players are

Deutsche Bank: innovation labs in London, Berlin and Silicon Valley (July 2015).

NASDAQ: (May 2015) NASDAQ Private Market Platform. leverage the Open Assets Protocol. June 2015, Chain, a blockchain infrastructure provider for FIs and enterprises.

DBS Bank:

Coin Republic, a Singapore-based bitcoin company & Startupbootcamp FinTech. (May 2015)

BitX, Blockstrap and Colu provided the APIs for the two-day hackathon series. Omnichain (first place), Nubank (second place) and BlockIntel (third place,).

EBA:

Euro Banking Association (EBA) (in May 2015)

US Federal Reserve:

(Mar 2015)

SCB:

Chief Innovation Officer of Standard Chartered Bank, said that blockchain leveraged to cut costs and improve the transparency of financial transactions. (July 2015)

derivatives companies CME Group, Deutsche Boerse, clearing houses DTCC (depository trust & clearing corporation) and EuroCCP are working on projects around the use of blockchain as clearing. Also, there has been news that money transfer service provider Western Union could possibly look into Ripple technology to understand blockchain.

Fidor Bank: Kraken , Bitcoin.de, a P2P BTC, Ripple Labs.

LHV Bank: June 2014. Cuber Wallet in June 2015. Coinbase & Coinfloor,digital security with blockchain.

CBW Bank, Cross River Bank:

Ripple Labs = risk management system + lower cost remittance services. Pay pal is passe!

Rabobank, ABN Amro, ING Bank: Exploring blockchain for various banking services.

Goldman Sachs: Circle Internet Financial Ltd.’s $50M funding round.  Future of Finance.

BBVA Ventures: Coinbase.

Westpac:

UBS: cryptocurrency lab in London, smart bonds. Iduct called “utility settlement coin” with Clearmatics. I

BNY Mellon: “BK Coins” for gifts and other rewards.

Barclays Bank:

Safello, Everledger, Barclays’: CBA, Ripple Labs,USAA Bank, ANZ Bank, Ripple

BNP Paribas:

Societe Generale: [Need me bad!] BTC, blockchain and cryptocurrency expertise.

Citibank: “Citicoin,”