Aaqgs-Religion

Why does a happy agnostic so far, need agnostic religion?

1. Expand the limits of comprehension and argumentation
   
2. Determine gaps in comprehension to make amends when possible
   
3. Comprehend more my comprehension system
   
4. Consider and evaluate ways of cheating death
   There are some constraints from my past thinking
   Science is good, social sciences stupid, humanities entertainment with NO governance impact, only needed to apploy existing rules and stand aside on need disappearence! NO one can teach you, you must empirically view rersults of processes an decide how to challenge temporal realities. I can certainly adcise on what will not work – faith, God, experience, books, irrational techniques. There are NO known empirical techniques and rare sensible extrapolations. Even sane post-death logic is hard, but you must not bow to will-free social norms!
   1. “default-OK = innocent unless proven guilty” and “default-thug = guilty unless proven innocent” are NOT definite choices but depend on the context. In general, current coreligionist gurus are considered default-thug requiring this kind of starting-defense. ALL great questions like abortion, social-laws, family-laws, religion, assisted-death etc are community based and not UNIFORM, only needing uniformity on conflict of rights. Indian constitution guarantees equality before law, but does not mandate equal;ity of sexes which can be interpreted in function equality, easily shown absurd). Thus triple divorce is unconstitutional, polygamy or polyandry is not.
   2. Right-to-reply and address-public-encryption is sufficient to permit free-speech in all contexts without requiring a court! A court and lawyers is a horrible sign of disharmony and stupidity! A system requiring these is fundamentally screwed up! The biggest reason for US and GB gains are directly caused by lack of legislation – it is fundamental to my aaqgs-think that maladies be cured by invention of uniformly available rights and government or courts step in to uniformly resolve conflicts and administration of laws. It is not a matter of faith considered ALWAYS to be the refuge of the scoundrel, but extrapolation. I have obtained novel solutions, applicable in century-21 to the problems of free speech (encryption), self-defense (activators) and democracy (none-of-above, fractional vote, right-to-recall, negative-vote, confidence&privacy which applies to voting, companies and committees!
   3. Right to defend is intrinsic to individual, group battle against groups, individual to oppression.
   4. Money is the medium of exchange. Private property rights flow from terrible mess in shared commons. Certain compromises have to be made, enforced through blind laws. Private property is based on compromise, not religions, hence must have a limit on the differences, the so-called margin-of-safety related to the average development of society and not independent of work-incentives – even marginal work needs to be respected. I strongly request the authorities to pay unemployment to garbage pickers and sorters at the very least; with incentive based payments.
   
5. 
   

1. Disclaimer – I strongly reject any attempt to relate me to God; aqnd look-down on such believers. They are often BETTER humans than me, I have NEVER encountered one with my broad range of interests and dependencies. It is the latter – abilities to uniformly extend narrow specialized betterment; typical of IAS in india; that gives me hopes of superior quality thinking and my excursions into law and philosophy that gives me the confidence of taking on professional lawyers and politicians. Modi and Yogi are outside, since I do not know what enables them to function well for decades with only 4 hour of sleep!
   

Things that fly

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=588du55BcAY

Even though US citizen PIO, don't think can go back, thinking of starting business+ here, looked at these ideas, one above. Cheapest fly board is $15,000, likely provide 6 min flight end of year; requires no training; can be used to provide joyrides on a ticket. Even the ticket falls in medium class family budget at R60 to dollar. Worthy novelty once in life. Requires no skills, needed by ALL others.



Some recent ideas, considering india and my lack of business experience

1. ECP – difference can quit after 1 week unless consumer can see benefits
   
2. Glutathione skin whitening pre marriage by IV route – difference money-back if pre-treatment photo and post-treatment photo, unless visible improvement
   
3. Fly board
   
4. Must-pay software tied to cpu-number of device - money back on workaround
   
5. Can't-hack softwares - money back if hacked
   
6. 3D print-cafe
   
7. 48V dc devices shop, goal 1 ton solar a.c. From R65000 to Rs 45000 for 60% electric bill cost saving. ~= 8000 per year - money + device back if lesser savings.
   
   
   

Aaqgs-democracy = stake-holder democracy

Stakeholder Definition

Too many existing subhumans believe in definite unique answers to great questions - birth-related abortion issues, living related what-religion issues, and death-related assisted-dearth issues. None of these great questions have definite answers, the right answer ALWAYS is stakeholder democracy prescription, that has regional and cultural divide. Aaqgs-encryption can provide the essential separation that makes it possible. Then the unique answer-er motherfuckers can be exiled from heaven and return of these sub animals can be prevented! Unless tolerance can be required and non-tolerant can be prevented from reinfection, toleration of every one is logically impossible! Toleration means intolerant ion of the intolerant! Those who are not willing to tolerate my views have no possibility of co-existence with me.

Fundamental to intolerance is the belief that no one else can have empirically testable difference of opinion. I apply to myself first. I believe in science, modern medicine and aaqgs-religion. None is by inheritance. Science means scientific method and application outside physical sciences. That leads to RP and why normal statistical error logic is wrong, while historical Bayesian logic is superior. Much harder than “what to believe” is “what not to believe”. Interestingly, “agree to disagree” does not mean quin sense, but difference in arguments. Only in the end does tolerance matter. So my religion is aaqgs, because I must know the nature that surrounds me, joyous existence, handling the aversions, semantic borderline complications like moot court resolution 

My views on modern medicine is healthy disbelief in outside the specialty and great belief in no-drug treatments like plants and exercise. It amazes me that a sickly man like myself can rationally dream of 200 year amortal life!

Which brings us to stake-holder democracy. While experiencing of plans in Delhi and Peking may make arguments, neither city has any relevance in new-york-city voting. Semantically we capture it in standing. Clearly a justifiable issue in border cases. Stake-holder democracy is a crucial concept in infinitely sub-dividable vote with multiple voting and right to recall. Computer is required and interval arithmetic redundant modes are needed for confidence and reliability. While plain aadhaar is still opposed,aa-aadhaar can be used for unabusable biological identity

Roughly, a person has a new-identity for every new transaction and only permitted correlations can exist between identities. Arbitrary admitted correlations are possible, that is why aa-aadhaar is very powerful concept.

There are very large number of voting and vote counting methods, and there exist many impossibility theorems that show that many desirable properties can not bne combined. I call them Impossibility-theorems. These are not new, thermodynamics delegates many processes to impossibility as it violates the second law. Entropy is a concept easily generalized to quantum mechanics using the concept of information. Every physical process preserves or increases information. Only time it fails is at creation time. So Impossibility-theorems exist. Faster-than-light speeds arte only possible with information transfer through entanglement!


Roughly then, Aaqgs-democracy = stake-holder democracy, and ALL known impossibility theorems like Arrow's are sidestepped, and the goal of sub-divisibility, gerrymandering, multiple votes and much-candidacy are retained.

Democracy Program

Aaqgs-democracy = stake-holder democracy

Too many existing subhumans believe in definite unique answers to great questions -birth-related abortion issues, living related what-religion issues, and death-related assisted-dearth issues. None of these great questions have definite answers, the right answer ALWAYS is stakeholder democracy prescription, that has regional and cultural divide. Aaqgs-encryption can provide the essential separation that makes it possible. Then the unique answer-er motherfuckers can be exiled from heaven and return of these sub animals can be prevented! Unless tolerance can be required and non-tolerant can be prevented from reinfection, toleration of every one is logically impossible! Toleration means intolerant ion of the intolerant! Those who are not willing to tolerate my views have no possibility of co-existence with me.

Fundamental to intolerance is the belief that no one else can have empirically testable difference of opinion. I apply to myself first. I believe in science, modern medicine and aaqgs-religion. None is by inheritance. Science means scientific method and application outside physical sciences. That leads to RP and why normal statistical error logic is wrong, while historical Bayesian logic is superior. Much harder than “what to believe” is “what not to believe”. Interestingly, “agree to disagree” does not mean quin sense, but difference in arguments. Only in the end does tolerance matter. So my religion is aaqgs, because I must know the nature that surrounds me, joyous existence, handling the aversions, semantic borderline complications like moot court resolution My views on modern medicine is healthy disbelief in outside the specialty and great belief in no-drug treatments like plants and exercise. It amazes me that a sickly man like myself can rationally dream of 200 year amortal life!

Which brings us to stake-holder democracy. While experiencing of plans in Delhi and Peking may make arguments, neither city has any relevance in new-york-city voting. Semantically we capture it in standing. Clearly a justifiable issue in border cases. Stake-holder democracy is a crucial concept in infinitely sub-dividable vote with multiple voting and right to recall. Computer is required and interval arithmetic redundant modes are needed for confidence and reliability. While plain aadhaar is still opposed,aa-aadhaar can be used for unabusable biological identity. 

Roughly, a person has a new-identity for every new transaction and only permitted correlations can exist between identities. Arbitrary admitted correlations are possible, that is why aa-aadhaar is very powerful concept.

There are very large number of voting and vote counting methods, and there exist many impossibility theorems that show that many desirable properties can not bne combined. I call them Impossibility-theorems. These are not new, thermodynamics delegates many processes to impossibility as it violates the second law. Entropy is a concept easily generalized to quantum mechanics using the concept of information. Every physical process preserves or increases information. Only time it fails is at creation time. So Impossibility-theorems exist. Faster-than-light speeds arte only possible with information transfer through entanglement!


Roughly then, Aaqgs-democracy = stake-holder democracy, and ALL known impossibility theorems like Arrow's are sidestepped, and the goal of sub-divisibility, gerrymandering, multiple votes and much-candidacy are retained.

TOE candidate

TOE stands for Theory Of Everything. It must range over every thing, in particular over 3 ubertheory, an aaqgs neologism to name three theories, howsoever strange, of which NO exceptions are known, these being Quantum mechanics QM, general relativity GR and evolution in all natural domains. Collectively, together with stoicism and semantic border, they explain nature, living and understanding i.e. aaqgs. Unification of QM and GR has been fruitlessly pursued for hundred years, string theory arose but is discard able as non-science. QFT or Quantum Field Theory exists and applies without exception but still not enough. So what is QFT? Can a non physicist gasp its meat?

In physics, a gauge theory is a type of field theory in which the Lagrangian is invariant under a continuous group of local transformations.

https://www.wikiwand.com/en/Introduction_to_gauge_theory

QFT says there is no such thing as particle. Entire universe is covered by a field. Various particles are energy packets such that on contact the waves do not mix but are elastically scattered. All physics theories are gauge symmetries, SU(1) being normal electricity to SU(3) being quantum electrodynamics. QM and GR are hyper small and hyper-large and do not mix except on black holes.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DCXasr-y8Vo

The standard model and QFT is enough to explain LHC results. No new physics has been found.
Within Tech Fi, I can imagine Faster-than-light or FTL information but not material transfer; and no reasonable sci fi can reverse this! This is because there are strong theorems that limit the velocity of ANY particle below light. However, quantum entanglement has been measured to at least 1000 times faster than light. This hope is also ignited by transference of entanglement and bomb-tester and Zeno results! Strange place to meet the Stoicism founder!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w0ztlIAYTCU&feature=youtu.be

Warning – I do not believe because I do not believe in consciousness as essential element, the moon exists even when not being watched!

Democracy in politics

Politics is a math field, say I, the successor of most illiberal is the most democratic. If you read the founding of USA, the biggest discussion in aristocratic era was between federalists(Hamilton, Madison,...) and republicans (Jefferson,...). It is between majoritarian democracy (Jefferson,...) and anti-democratic constitutional control. Switzerland is MORE democratic than USA but LESS free, they took the lead in expulsion and bigoted rules on Muslims! It is strange that US liberals now find virtues in Hamilton, the most pro-wall-street (starter) and Gold-bug ever, glorified by Nazi and Fascist! Hence my saying. P:et Km-siater wail and make evil ugly accusations re fraud!

Or this quote from Madison - Pure democracy, by which I mean a society consisting of a small number of citizens, who assemble and administer the government in person, can admit no cure for the mischief of faction. A common passion or interest will be felt by a majority of the whole, and there is nothing to check the inducements to sacrifice the weaker party or an obnoxious individual. Hence it is that democracies have ever . . . been found incompatible with personal security or the rights of property; and have, in general, been as short in their lives as they have been violent in their deaths.

Trump lost straight count but won electoral college. So did Bush jr. Happened half dozen times. Changing constitution requires 2/3 majority and is involved process. Indian SC derailed IG by inventing Fundamental Structure of constitution. Judge gates risked his life and refused the onslaught of popular revolution in Fiji against Indians in 2000, followed this brave man who refused to play dead even against a revolution! Result – Fiji thrives in 2017, despite liberal stupidities of Australia and New Zealand!

Modi is not liberal, but his opponents, open incompetence, scare me. I can not imagine A MAN DEVOTED TO CONSTITUTION to be unfree. Perhaps Sir Trump needs to learn and not criticize the Judiciary. There ALWAYS are clever work arounds.
New polls – Current UP votes WERE miscounted by exit polls. Trump, Brexit,... What goes? Allan Lichtman, a professor of history at American University, has predicted every election result since 1984 (except in 2000, when the Electoral College decided that both the popular vote and the professor should be ignored). His calculus pays no attention to polls or approval ratings; instead, it looks at the incumbent administration and asks a few very basic questions. Has there been major social unrest? Have there been disastrous foreign interventions? Has economic growth been higher or lower than in the last two administrations? If the incumbent party manages the slow decline of capitalism efficiently, they’ll win again. If not, someone else will. And in September 2016, he totted up all his columns and announced that Donald Trump would win. He didn’t quite believe it himself; in an interview with the Washington Post he was full of caveats and reservations. “We’ve never had a candidate before who not just once, but twice in a thinly disguised way, has incited violence against his opponents. We’ve never had a candidate before who has embraced as a role model a murderous, hostile foreign dictator.” In the end, it didn’t matter. Makes sense at lastt. Lets call this aaqgc-poll. Try it re end of year re Gujerat!
Mischievous Anti-Trump link

Democracy in politics

Politics is a math field, say I, the successor of most illiberal is the most democratic. If you read the founding of USA, the biggest discussion in aristocratic era was between federalists(Hamilton, Madison,...) and republicans (Jefferson,...). It is between majoritarian democracy (Jefferson,...) and anti-democratic constitutional control. Switzerland is MORE democratic than USA but LESS free, they took the lead in expulsion and bigoted rules on Muslims! It is strange that US liberals now find virtues in Hamilton, the most pro-wall-street (starter) and Gold-bug ever, glorified by Nazi and Fascist! Hence my saying. Federalists are for strong center, republicans for devolution. Modi-love not withstanding, aaqgs-me am for devolution and unequal laws by states. Thats why SAARC can become a nation.

Or this quote from Madison - Pure democracy, by which I mean a society consisting of a small number of citizens, who assemble and administer the government in person, can admit no cure for the mischief of faction. A common passion or interest will be felt by a majority of the whole, and there is nothing to check the inducements to sacrifice the weaker party or an obnoxious individual. Hence it is that democracies have ever . . . been found incompatible with personal security or the rights of property; and have, in general, been as short in their lives as they have been violent in their deaths.
Trump lost straight count but won electoral college. So did Bush jr. Happened half dozen times. Changing constitution requires 2/3 majority and is involved process. Indian SC derailed IG by inventing  Fundamental Structure of constitution. Judge gates risked his life and refused the onslaught of popular revolution in Fiji against Indians in 2000, followed this brave man who refused to play dead even against a revolution! Result – Fiji thrives in 2017, despite liberal stupidities of Australia and New Zealand!

Modi is not liberal, but his opponents, open incompetence, scare me. I can not imagine A MAN DEVOTED TO CONSTITUTION to be unfree. Perhaps Sir Trump needs to learn and not criticize the Judiciary. There ALWAYS are clever workarounds.

New polls – Current UP votes WERE miscounted by exit polls. Trump, Brexit,... What goes? Allan Lichtman, a professor of history at American University, has predicted every election result since 1984 (except in 2000, when the Electoral College decided that both the popular vote and the professor should be ignored). His calculus pays no attention to polls or approval ratings; instead, it looks at the incumbent administration and asks a few very basic questions. Has there been major social unrest? Have there been disastrous foreign interventions? Has economic growth been higher or lower than in the last two administrations? If the incumbent party manages the slow decline of capitalism efficiently, they’ll win again. If not, someone else will. And in September 2016, he totted up all his columns and announced that Donald Trump would win. He didn’t quite believe it himself; in an interview with the Washington Post he was full of caveats and reservations. “We’ve never had a candidate before who not just once, but twice in a thinly disguised way, has incited violence against his opponents. We’ve never had a candidate before who has embraced as a role model a murderous, hostile foreign dictator.” In the end, it didn’t matter.  Makes sense at lastt. Lets call this aaqgc-poll. Try it re end of year re Gujarat!

Warning - Absurd Ani-Trump.