Free speech and Modern sub animals

Must click links

 Like chapter 11 of "Satyartha Prakash", what follows is implicit review of existing, in that they will flat on 1 point or more. That mine does not, likely extensible by you to new situations you can imagine or encounter, develop criticism on your own without help, feeling that you can ask for help in the rare cases of doubt, means I have done THE excellent job.

As has been repeatedly pointed out to me – abusive words do no strengthen the argument and I agree. I still use them to indicate my own lack of tolerance forsome opponents. While very few is number, I do hold as deserving some intemperate views on some – child sexual protagonists, cannibals, etc. as free-speech criminals. But only criminals, not different in opinion, or details.

Free speech has painfully but inexorably won the day. Not even I suggest burning of the few tome or proponents opposed to me. I do advocate retirement to libraries (access publically available) to tomes as above, or how to make bombs, launch sarin attacks on metro-tunnels, sex life of Martian aliens etc. Every censored material is NEVER prohibited, either it can be displayed; or not. If not displayable, it must be encrypted well, but the keys have to be made publically available painlessly - only to record the access list and protect the sensibilities of the opponents – with thwarting technological techniques used only to prevent untraceable copies.

Let us call this arun-arya censoring. Consider .latest wired abstract : The traditional censorship model—find the information conduit and apply pressure—has all but collapsed. “Whose throat do you squeeze when anyone can set up a Twitter account in seconds, and when almost any event is recorded by smartphone-wielding members of the public?” writes Zeynep Tufekci, sociologist at the University of North Carolina. Your speech is free. But you are not.

See, while this may be the golden age of free speech, it is not the golden age of truthfulness. The attention-harvesting and ad-targeting strategies of big tech are all too compatible with misinformation campaigns and censorship enforced by outraged, viral hordes. “Free speech is usually understood as a vehicle ... for creating a knowledgeable public; for engendering healthy, rational, and informed debate; for holding powerful people and institutions accountable; for keeping communities lively and vibrant,” Tufekci writes. “What we are seeing now is that when free speech is treated as an end and not a means, it is all too possible to thwart and distort everything it is supposed to deliver.”

Also: Ex-Uber engineer Anthony Lewandowski faces claims of stealing trade secrets, an antifascist maintains a database of far-right foes, and at-home genetic testing companies claim to know your baby’s traits before they’re even born.

The conflicts in censoring are very complex, no one but me have been able to solve this judicial dilemma over past 5000 or more years. I can, have discussed in this essay, consider nondeterministic solutions from ANY religion to be sub animal, REQUIRE ANY opponent to SHUTUP or ARGUE in public! 

True extreme mental conflict is Cloudfare, the DDos protection company from vigilante hackers, also police! Their bigger argument is about the danger of private companies like Cloudflare (not to mention Google or Amazon Web Services) determining what constituted acceptable speech. “Without a clear framework as a guide for content regulation,” Their Prince explained, “a small number of companies will largely determine what can and cannot be online.” Perhaps his most striking point came in a separate memo he wrote to his staff. “Literally, I woke up in a bad mood and decided someone shouldn’t be allowed on the internet. No one should have that power.”PRINCE’S DILEMMA OVER the Daily Stormer has been present in net culture from the early days of online communities. 

Solution is simple to state –

Every nation (UNO) has a recognised majority (accepted by active majority) which can determine any speech to be offensive and order it to be well encrypted or decrpted, solely force-determine the reader list (technologically one can prohibit untraceable copying and  false-flag references), the list itself encrypted and decrypted according to laws of the nation.

This solution allows prevention of external enemies from collaborating with locals inciting resistance against totalitarian regimes. But can never silence encryptions chosen by the end-points under the rules. Committed source can still win. Point is loss of an easy way to use internet! Never should be important for police work! In fact, totalitarian regimes will likely be my first clients!

"Cannot communicate inside" can still be done done using this very clever simple solution, or my technological solution even legacy by my technological means. 

 In short, above be written as: Every nation (UNO) has a recognised majority (accepted by active majority) that can arun-arya-censor (as  in latest arun-arya-dictionary) any speech.

Rest is significantly more interesting as many applications are considered. Any one dumb enough to think having a better solution must be able to present solutions to all the following.

Bomb making

Sharp retail practices

Abducted by aliens

Denier’s of facts

Tainted reports on events

Manual on making bombs

Crying fire in a theatre

Abusing the national flag

Abusing trademark symbols

Truth in advertisement

Political promises

Claims to scientific truth

Claim to belong to a religion

Claims to be prize winner

Claim to a position

To be Done

Must click links

Whenever, no sequentiality or any other deduction

shilajit and CoQ10

Must click links,  philosophy

I have unfortunate reputation of lover of western medicine. It’s a matter of epistemology. Homeopathy is criminal because its methodology is wrong and careful placebo driven trials regularly disprove its efficacy. So is true of Ayurveda in general. However the bounty of inexpensive equivalent medicine and massive distrust of the FDA process in view of political compulsions has forced me to evidence based medicine, as exemplified by Cochrane collaboration and essential loners like DE Grey and sens.

The topic of today is “Shilajit and CoQ10”. This combination would not occur to a Vaidya or westerner. It occurs to two – a highly respected team of Bengali scientists and me, fervent believer in east-west medicine and self + family experimenter. Rest is my choices for gerontology applied to myself, and parents.

First is East-west medicine. First filter applied is that if some Ayurveda procedure is opposed by majority of western knowledgeable folk, that is enough to destroy the product. Whole lot of bhasam medicines are eliminated. Then there must be positive  or zero support for Ayurveda procedure with eastern and western reactions sum to high. Very important point is that western medicine views are epistemological, fully free of being western person. This essay if on Bengali work of good presentation.

As written earlier, I believe in trikuta and triphala aggregation with western medicine. I practice that by ingesting Ramdev trikuta with western medicine tranche in  morning and night. I ingest medicine for diabetes, heart, headache, and several supplements. These include Niagen, CoQ10, Calcium. After this essay, I will add Shilajit.

Trikuta has a reputation of being indifferent add to chemicals. Its particular purpose is improving digestion of whatever. Only Ramdev products are allowed!

Triphala is avoided as a diabetic.

My gerontological belief end at anti-oxidants. Proper physician must prescribe others. Fundamental to my belief is the Krebs cycle and its models. The complex Kreb cycle satisfies

1.       Mitochondrial containment

2.       Model by three super cycles – Citric acid, ATP-ADP, and NADH-NAD+.

Aging is feeling low because of lack of energy by Kreb cycle. The situation is improved by incrementing 1 or more cycles. Anti-oxidants improve NADH-NAD+ and ADP-ATP cycles.

The NADH-NAD+ cycle isimproved in one step by NMN or 2 steps divided by niagen. That essay has alreadybeen done.

The ATP-ATP cycle needs coQ10 as used catalyst. Interestingly, Shilajit has two components 3- OH-DBP and 3,8-(OH)2-DBP where DBP means dibenzo-α-pyrone also as used catalyst. Collectively, CoQ10 and Shilajit seem to indicate synergistic improvement. I already take CoQ10. Hence improving the cycle is very low cost.

My parents are NOT financially dependent on me. Still I feel obligation for food, paying them roughly by Niagen costs and CoQ10 costs. Drug companies would have bankrupted me away in USA. Only in India can I pay for medicine and needed medical advice only. Means gerontological upkeep is my own responsibility!

The Arun Arya 6-dimensional universe

Latest Link
Theory of six dimensions - Ouspensky and David Deutsch

To Einstein goes the credit of making time as a special but as realistic as the three spatial dimensions. That is hence a 4D universe with 3 spatial and one temporal dimensions. I have argued that quantum mechanics implies 2 or more temporal dimensions. QM also implies another spatial dimension through Hall effect! Thus we have a six or more dimensional universe, at least reachable through current experiments in real universe!

The extra temporal dimension is motivated by efforts to reconcile Everett’s many worlds in a parsimonious way. It leads to computational methods in quantum chemistry. The extra spatial dimension comes from attempts to reconcile many Hall effect results which is best done by assuming that the experiments are on many 3D images of a single 4D object!

By placing together two specially designed 2D setups, two separate teams of researchers - one in Europe and one in the US - were able to catch a glimpse of this fourth spatial dimension through what's known as the quantum Hall effect, (required read to understand rest) a certain way of restricting and measuring electrons. 

"Physically, we don't have a 4D spatial system, but we can access 4D quantum Hall physics using this lower-dimensional system because the higher-dimensional system is coded in the complexity of the structure”.

In two dimensions, when classical electrons are subjected to a magnetic field they follow circular cyclotron orbits. When the system is treated quantum mechanically, these orbits are quantized. The energy levels of these quantized orbitals take on discrete values:

{\displaystyle E_{n}=\hbar \omega _{\text{c}}(n+1/2),}E.n = h-bar w.c (n + ½)

where ω_c = eB/m is the cyclotron frequency.

he European team's setup involved atoms cooled down close to absolute zero and placed in a 2D lattice through the user of lasers, described as "an egg-carton-like crystal of light" by the researchers.

With the addition of extra lasers, the team was able to implement a quantum "charge pump" to excite the trapped atoms and get them moving. Slight variations in the movement spotted by the researchers match up with how a 4D quantum Hall effect would ripple out – adding weight to the possibility that a fourth spatial dimension can be somehow accessed.

The US experiment also used lasers, this time to control light as it flowed through a block of glass. By manipulating the light to simulate the effect of an electric field on charged particles, again the consequences of a 4D quantum Hall effect could be observed.

My philosophy

NMN directly not NR

Freshest Link

I have been interestedin anti-aging and life-extension drugs from a rational stoic (near science)point of view. Difference to (science = rational scepticism) is that statements of scientists are accepted in absence of rational doubts in speech and presentation (very negative whole advertisement) i.e. trust level  improves or reduces based on actions directly or responsibility-wise).

My extensive research on aging has filtered many contextual loves like resveratrol as philosophically ineffective mechanism, also proven by experiment to be ineffective.

Why not, what lessons?

The proponent did not consider transport and sales-business delays, even though the science was solid.

Why was it scientific?

It functions well in natural world at low concentrations where storage is not a problem i.e. red wine. One could do complex medical chase and isolate the core ingredient responsible for the goodness – that is what western medicine is about. One can chase more and find that ultimately within human mitochondria (evolution-shared by rats (mice) and monkeys) what is improved.

What is this about?

Both Nicotinamide Riboside and nicotinamide mononucleotide are NAD+ precursor, and able to increase the NAD+ level. The likely mechanism of nicotinamide mononucleotide uptake is extracellular conversion to nicotinamide riboside (NR). In addition, NMN is more powerful than NR in its anti-aging effects. Of course, the price of NMN is much more expensive. Reference says  here has been very little research conducted on human, and adverse effects of NMN is not known. Always conduct your doctor before taking NMN supplements.
Turns out, mitrochondriac NAD+ declines with age in all humans and animals and is proportional to vitality. What resveratrol did was to boost NAD+.

How does it fall?

Exponentially half life 20 years! 60 is 12% of birth. 80 is 6%. 100 is 3%. Goal is to boost NAD+. Not NaDH directly, no reaction set! Cell energy cycle from Krebs is ATP<=>ADP or  NaDH(v Work) <=> NAD+(^food) or Citric acid.

why not inject nad+ directly?

NAD+ cannot be given directly to the mice because of its toxic effects (serious hyperglycemia … http://sumo.ly/8ahe via @herbnutritional

What does it boost? How to get more of it?

One can suppress the detail of how. Many biological systems have a cycle in chemicals. NAD+ has 2 – de novo and salvage cycle. Critical is salvage about 85%. Food boosts NAD+ to NADH, discharges back to NAD+. Can't boost NaDH directly! The salvage cycle is to a form of vitamin B3 (nicotanamide). As the picture shows, NAMPT interaction is necessary to become NMN.

NR, nicotanamide riboside, trade name niagen, which I feed to mom and dad was near best in past. As the diagram shows, some part becomes NMN. Another just B3 and may get boosted to NMN through NAMPT bottleneck. So there is some benefit in boosting NR concentration. NR costs about $1 per day. Doubling it to $2 is possible but ruins me financially, supporting 2. Cant involve my sisters (have no brother) in a rational-stoic effort absent settled rational-sceptic. Problem is that tests in progress will yield data (preliminary) by Jun 2018. That is likely too late for Dad. So test doses need to be given to him! Cost is secondary with success given low weight and ill-effects very high weights.

Three outcomes are +ve, indifferent and –ve. In consultation with Indian doc treating him, I have established after two years of paper feeding that my proposal has no –ve consequences (mice tests,  proposed dose etc.).

Now doctors say likely waste of money, no benefits, good dad-bhakti! Dad says bad-idea, I will not consume because already quaffing 18 pills a day in 7 occasions (part of diabetes just before a meal, wake, sleep, between meals). He be damned if consuming another speculative benefit, certain high cost to me, another unnecessary pill! So much for son-bhakti!

Back to my narrative. NR is $1 per day. It is likely ½ as effective as NMN. Before Dec 8, 2017 I could buy NMN at $10 per day – extracting it from cows. Then a clever chemist got into act and now NMN direct is $1.50 per day. If NMN is twice as effective than NR, 250 mg per day will be like 500 mg of NR.

I have personally tried 500 mg NR every other day and interspersed it with 500 mg no flushing B3 for 3 months. Now on 250 mg Niagen per day straight for 3 months. I will try 3 month 250 mg/day NMN on me starting april I will see if Dad agrees.

The stoic solution to scepticism re NAD+ is this reference from Scientific American!

The hard part is the skeptical query from father - forget the theory, how will I feel different or show me a proof. Proofr can't be done to June! No reported improved feelings. BUT growth in NAD+ should slow the deterioration! May be try for a month!

My philosophy

Building aalan – 2 block-chain

Latest link

This project is special in that I view new syntax more necessity and a virtual clientele who would be there when it is offered as a product. It expands Go in 3 directions I consider crucial

1.       Multiple-inheritance

2.       Non-deterministic programming

3.       Built-in block-chain

It removes in-build memory management. Rust idea of language supported reference counting and help in avoiding reference loops is very important. So is language provide block-chain for all applications. Unit the ability of separating intentions from executions, letting robots do them progressively more, automating continuously is basic reason for new syntax, not just library improvements. From python comes the idea of infinitely extensible language whenever the syntax is not needed, and from Go the point of brevity.

NO language provides ANY of these 3 despite the need for them! Reason is simple, MI requires new algorithms only I know, even though easy to do in slow interpreted languages, non-deterministic programming is limited to compilers area, while block-chains are only being done by deep pockets even though the goal is to kill the deep pockets. Quickly the world will consist of deep pocket users of block-chain attempting murderous first-mover patent attacks, from which India will be lot safer than USA.

This is about block-chain and its presentation for any application, not just crypto-currency. All bold nouns can be safely replaced by homogenous chains. The aalan world has Clients conversing with Agents who talk to miners. An agent is smart enough to code and decode. All the Miners maintain a transcript in local private order. At the same time, they are involved in a statistically fair tournament. Whenever one wins, the win is broadcast as a transaction. Let us assume that there is a global unique number (originating miner. Serial) of every transaction. The victory transaction has an ordered list of the winner. Now everyone defers to this order! A miner can have some extra items which are moved to next block. Some missing ones, are gotten from known miners. I assume that the item itself has encrypted text such that a miner can’t understand. Note that I describe the supermedioum block chain free of miner contention. In normal block-chain, contention winner is recognised as competent to extend current hash-block.

That contention serves no purpose is the major point in my favor. The miners win round-robin every period and then broadcast their block. Every one rejects even one block with ANY error of double spend or undirected points. Every one, when their time, send their block time signatured by self. Eliminating contention saves enormously on electricity! It is provably fair! No-one can cheat without without cheat creating blocks of every miner. Any lesser speed is useless!

Once a block is complete in a miner, he send the block to a local cloud. Per miner, many lists of client are kept. The agent chooses which list per transaction. The local cloud is a reliable Ethernet connected net or fast multiprocessor (super medium). The entire block is broadcast. Decryption only happens in the selected representative for client. No miner can make sense of encryption.

A suspicious client is welcome to act as own agent!

Let us walk through two application – loyalty points and smart contract.

Loyalty points – Agent accepts money and gives loyalty points.  Miner does the duplication, so ALL miners get the same message. Super medium does the duplication, so all representatives get the same copy. If message is (A give n points to B) every one ensures A has n points. If so all subtract the amount from A and add to B. Here Agent is A and customer B. If B cashes some loyalty points, B gives to A. A starts infinity and B starts 0.

Smart contract - A smart contract is a computer protocol intended to digitally facilitate, verify, or enforce the negotiation or performance of a contract. Smart contracts allow the performance of credible transactions without third parties. These transactions are track able and irreversible. Smart contracts were first proposed by Nick Szabo in 1994. New institutions, and new ways to formalize the relationships that make up these institutions, are now made possible by the digital revolution. I call these new contracts "smart", because they are far more functional than their inanimate paper-based ancestors. No use of artificial intelligence is implied.

To create a smart contract you need:

• Subject of the contract

The program must have access to goods or services under contract to lock and unlock them automatically.

• Digital signatures

All the participants initiate an agreement by signing the contract with their private keys.

• Contract terms

Terms of a smart contract take the form of an exact sequence of operations. All participants must sign these terms.

• Decentralized platform

The smart contract is deployed to the block-chain of this platform and distributed among the nodes of the platform.

They can be used in untold number of ways.

1.       Elections

2.       Logistics (Businessman – goods/warehouse customer)

3.       Titles (owner contract customer)

4.       Contract (provider service customer)

5.       …

Among fuckable are most government servants, lawyers middlemen politicians … Lets privatize them all!

A transaction tax can be imposed on goods as well as smart contracts. NO corruption is possible! Depending on political will, different taxation rates can be applied depending on who does this type of transaction more!

My philosophy

“Where do we live” and “where to die"

Must click links

We are in the local cluster of Laniakea super cluster, which has a star sol in a galaxy milky way; on a planet called earth. In aalan

Laniakea . local-cluster. Milky-way. sol. earth

Virgo supercluster is a neighbour, rather than us! You could extend it to the pc in front of you. And pregnant science says - our universe is in multiverse.

This madness is science, which has toexplain even nomenclature in terms of something empirical - when is something a planet, star, galaxy, super cluster; the referenced utube video explains some beautifully.

Dying on Mars

If we’reever going to send humans to Mars, we’re going to need water—whether it’s for drinking and growing food for settlers, or to convert into hydrogen to fuel the trip home. Scientists have long known that the Red Planet is home to plenty of water ice, but they haven’t been able to gauge its purity or potential for mining. Until now. As science writer Robbie Gonzalez reports, researchers have discovered eight sites on Mars where, thanks to land erosion, vast quantities of ice are available. And that ice is looking incredibly pure.

It’s going to take a lot of work to drill down to the ice and analyze its composition, and we likely won’t know much more until 2020, when NASA and the European Space Agency are slated to launch new Mars rovers. But the very existence of the ice is cause for celebration: If it is indeed as pure as geologists suspect, human survival on Mars becomes a whole lot more plausible. As Gonzalez writes, “optimistic timelines put our arrival on the Red Planet sometime during the 2030s. Where we land, how long we visit, and what we bring along will all depend on the resources that await us—and how hard we’ll have to work to get them.”

I will be inearly seventies in 2030 and lifting weights throughout the decade. I will even finance or pay Mr. Musk to fulfill my dream - me or my ashes! I might not even die in this millenium!