paradigm shift in medicine

My epistemology allowed me to violate my golden commandment – thou will obey thy doctor. When is it OK? The question required a lot of thinking. I pen it to be criticized, more mercilessly the better, for empty evil words do not bother my thick skin and even bad words are either ignored or retaliated solely by fouler language. In other words, criticizing me, howsoever, is a safe occupation.

The class letter

Sir all, Fundamental to my epistemology is detailed review of what seems to make sense, largely I have learned to doubt self and friends using them and me as valid excellent sources of worth-investigation hypotheses but very poor sources of evidence. My life change seriously with an off-hand link by DM (gave me stoicism) as knowable example and another one by Ashok on diabetes that also made sense to me.

Turns out, the MD he talked about and intermittent fasting are symptoms of a paradigm shift in medicine, happening visible to us. Unlike many friends here, my disquiet with allopathy does not drive me to less effective OIE of medicine of gone days, instead to cutting edge, perhaps less statistical strong, allowed only for newbies and NEVER anecdotes, no matter how good. This guy is unlikely a flake or others rejectable as NOT having academic background. The point is wonder of logic – total ass may wrongly apply logic and still get right answer! Fasting is one, that my friends swear by it, deep religious thinkers say it, adds zero evidence. They also get zero credit! But Atkins diet works!

My wife, US MD had long discussions with me on why it works despite being opposed to usual (OIE) medicine! Now here is the fun – after my research, fasting (start 1 per week) has been started. Horrible idea for diabetics! BUT I took precautions -

1. heart med are not taken empty stomach. Tranches were quaffed after some oats curry morn and night.
   
2. Did not take diabetes med while fasting
   
3. FIRST Fasting is bad. I had 5 glasses of water, 5 cups of green tea and three glass of lemon.
   
4. For every non-diabetic, watermelon (EVEN LARGE BUT NOT SUPERLARGE) size OK.
   
5. His kind of advice marks me an idiot in else-motivated people, welcome to my case with ignored comments unless how else to deal with heart drugs and headaches! There is allopathic fasting, ha ha.
   6. Give myself 2 months. Goal is elimination of ziten M.
   0
   

Missing Points

why is the step dangerous?

Traditional medicine considers fasting diabetic as sinful.

Why?
Low sugars can hit very hard.

How avoided?

Some oatmeal by force. Stop diabetic medicine – even blue moon sugar spike OK. Test blood six times.

How should normal people do it, even intelligent s?

Doctor care essential.

What makes you different?

1 erudite discussion and reference lookup on Atkins's diet in with wife, then, a US MD. In other words, I encourage you to talk to a concerned doctor own or spouse.
2 Knowing current medicines, purpose, impact of missing, method of administration - heart med
3 Close-by emergency and being able to afford them.
4 etc

Point of paradigm shift is progressive idiotification of experienced senior people. Has neen seen by me and resolutely avoided – programmer 1955-1975 structured, pre-internet 1975-1995 UNIXERS, visual 1996-2015 java c++, encryption 2015+ interpreted phone-based IoT tor tails. A paradigm shift against ALL newbies is happening. So is it in medicine - 20 century versus 21.

How characterize?

The world consists of allopathic [modern medicine] and ALL others. Within allopathy is a aaqgs-clear distinction between acute and chronic. Current mm is VERY good at acute care, MUCH better than all others. Situation is very muddy for chronic. A chronic situation is one where no cure is known, best prescriptions are holding strategies, short term improvements are sometimes possible and abused by essentially criminals passing off as alternate doctors. Any technology giving temporary relief but not a cure is sometimes useful in end-stags but criminal before and allopaths who do it are as criminal unless having diagnosed end-stage before!

So what is the shift you see?

1 Unification of chronic diseases causes – not microbes but oxidation, insulin and telomeres.

2 Reduction of chronic cures to ant-oxidants, ant-diabetes and anti-telomere-shortening 

3 Increasing role of non-chemical cures like stomach-stapling, looks-surgery, exercise, ecp.

4 Enormous role of stem cells

5 bio-copying engineerng

Along with newer drugs 95-120 age is possible; hibernation to 200 or maybe by life-extension of cells like long-lived trees; electronic transference for ever. You MUST live to 95 with conventional medicine. That means aggressive sugar control, exercise, safe diet, anti-oxidants. I do them all and invite others to do it themselves or even borrow notes.

Immortal life as cyborg with unlikely but doable plan (which must benefit even if it fails)

Plans with that property deserve a name missing in english, henceforth bounce-plans, where you get a significant boost though unknown amount which depends. Allopathic fasting gives a boost in chronic medicine.

A general aaqgs-trademark scheme

Given that the trademark part of USPTO is aaqgs-criminally responsible to torturous behavior towards TBI-sick me, unrelieved as lacking in funds then and statuary time limitation now; it is terribly important to me to invent a scheme that makes at least that section irrelevant and then trash its employees of wasteful unnecessary people.

There is important cryptography insight, one internet insight and two physics insights that make this revenge possible. Given its scope, it will do banknotes, articles and what not – enough to emfubar the sub animals.

The cryptography insight is - there is NO solution to base ^ power % mod = value when all but power is known. It becomes even harder if mod is not known as well.
The internet insight is - it is possible to completely shield a computation in clouds, returning the answer within micro-seconds sand transparently increase the computers responsible for identical computations proportional to paying load.

One physics insight is – quantum dots embedded in pillars by self-assembly process are quantum randomly placed.

Another physics insight is – under uniform strain, the dots photo-luminescence changes. A french group has already developed technology to determine the dot positions thus.

https://physics.aps.org/synopsis-for/10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.117401

Application:
Given the results, consider the deposit of such a substrate on any article. The dots vector forms a random large number from which an unknown subset is selected but the digital root of the selectin is recorded.

On the internet using clouds are sent the measurements and the digital root. A process remotely selects bits based on digital exponentiation to unknown power. Bits from measurements are subset based on this result, and the number is discret powered again to another unknown power (selected by the class of goods being protected). The result is sent back with ant-hack bits. After decode, it must be the same displayed on the article.

Why does it work?

1. Even trillion-trillion collection of pairs of (number printed, result expected) can be used to decode values hidden
2. Reuse of a valid number pair elsewhere is prevented by requiring same quantum dot pair elsewhere which is impossible due to uncontrolled quantum randomizing!
   

Electron Pulses Made Faster Than Atomic Motions

<sub>Every major advance in microscopy has resulted in revolution in medicine and production. It has allowed the scientists to visualize their current models from gedanken theoretical to experimental empirics. For example, the cutting edge state-of-art in heart care for me is radiation imaging of probes moved inside my heart i.e. angiography is the gold standard in heart diagnosis ans real-time ballooning, stents placement, and artery/vein manipulations. So what can do better than electron-beam scanning?



Turns out that atoms constituting a bond for anything fluctuate at 20 femtoseconds, Even the fastest H-binds (organic chemistry) at 10 femtoseconds. If electron trains can be developed faster than 10 femtoseconds, processes in any area can be still photo graphed, even femtosecond movies. That has been done!



The beam energy has to be large, so even in US, the labs are tied to reactors in department of energy like los alamos, sandia and lawrence livermore. Better known for weapons, one might wonder at the incentives to do cutting edge medical work! Yet they do and USA universities are way behind mostly. But not for long! Faster electron trains at lower energy levels is exciting area of research with no no-go-theorems to block path yet.



https://physics.aps.org/articles/v10/39</sub>

Last man standing

How can a man die better, 

Than facing fearful odds, 

For the ashes of his fathers, 

And temples of his gods.

A professional army quits with 2-3 casualties per 10, major Shaitan Singh died last day, after 114 ahir from 123 from rewari, Harayana died, fighting the Chinese in Rezang La, Laddhaqe in 1962, for which awarded PVC, posthumous. 

 Only motivation beyond professional is when you fight for your people or when convinced the enemy will mistreat you. So the horrible tom-tom of propaganda, highlight of genuine torture cases and interrogations; to convince professional army soldiers of expected maltreatment, soldiers in denial mode of such stories and no propaganda need for real causes like the regiment that sacrificed itself. 

So important was this sacrifice that if we have any part of Laddaque, it is because of this supreme sacrifice that blocked the advance of Chinese for rest of war, apart from judicious route inflicted in the battle.

To the sacred memory of the Heroes of Rezang La,
114 Martyrs of 13 Kumaon who fought to the Last Man,
Last Round, Against Hordes of Chinese on 18 November 1962.
Built by All Ranks 13th Battalion, The Kumaon Regiment

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rezang_La


'Nobody believed we had killed so many Chinese at Rezang La. Our commander called me crazy and warned that I could be court-martialled'". Retrieved 26 November 2014.

Creation time

Why is there far more matter than antimatter in the observable universe?

Prelude – above is a strict physics question but for me, central to my aaqgs-religion for stoicism (from s) requires you to first draw a map of the terrain before applying ethics to it. The conflict between stoics (Believers) and epicureans (atheists) is at least 2000 years old in greece. After this, I venture forth as agnostic but still needing religion to answers my doubts in ethics and my future using an epistemology from science alone, considering traditional inherited, stupid-tome or irrelevant experience based epistemology subhuman even when their believers are equal to me, often less-trroubled and ethically superior to me. It is their belief that are shit and if they shared my intellectual journeys, they would think like me or better.

I find mysef a member of family, from a villaage, in a nation on a planet. When I venture out, I see the moon, Sun and stars. I seek to know about them but I consider many accounts to be shit. Accounts that do not pass thgrough my epistemological filters are certainly shit. Even those passing are considered shit unless they are consistent with many others. Prestidigitation is assumed if the accounts conflict with no go theorems. Not much is left after these philosophical filters, but enough to yield very effective existential nqarrative of life as social scientific animal that can understand the progression to life through evolution. 

But where did the universe come from? What happened at big bang time, or do we have to invent the concept of God who disappeared after big bang? Narrative consistent with agnosticism and opposed TO ALL Religions but my aaqgs!

But then why did not the matter and qaantimatter destroy each othe

_{- In the first few moments of the Universe, enormous amounts of both matter and antimatter were created, and then moments later combined and annihilated generating the energy that drove the expansion of the Universe. But for some reason, there was an infinitesimal amount more matter than anti matter. Everything that we see today was that tiny fraction of matter that remained.}

But why? Why was there more matter than antimatter right after the Big Bang? Researchers from the University of Melbourne think they might have an insight.

Just to give you an idea of the scale of the mystery facing researchers, here’s Associate Professor Martin Sevior of the University of Melborne’s School of Physics:

“Our universe is made up almost completely of matter. While we are entirely used to this idea, this does not agree with our ideas of how mass and energy interact. According to these theories there should not be enough mass to enable the formation of stars and hence life.”

“In our standard model of particle physics, matter and antimatter are almost identical. Accordingly as they mix in the early universe they annihilate one another leaving very little to form stars and galaxies. The model does not come close to explaining the difference between matter and antimatter we see in the nature. The imbalance is a trillion times bigger than the model predicts.”

If the model predicts that matter and antimatter should have completely annihilated one another, why is there something, and not nothing?

The researchers have been using the KEK particle accelerator in Japan to create special particles called B-mesons. And it’s these particles which might provide the answer.

Mesons are particles which are made up of one quark, and one antiquark. They’re bound together by the strong nuclear force, and orbit one another, like the Earth and the moon. Because of quantum mechanics, the quark and antiquark can only orbit each other in very specific ways depending on the mass of the particles.

A B-meson is a particularly heavy particle, with more than 5 times the mass of a proton, due almost entirely to the mass of the B-quark. And it’s these B-mesons which require the most powerful particle accelerators to generate them.

In the KEK accelerator, the researchers were able to create both regular matter B-mesons and anti-B-mesons, and watch how they decayed.

“We looked at how the B-mesons decay as opposed to how the anti-B-mesons decay. What we find is that there are small differences in these processes. While most of our measurements confirm predictions of the Standard Model of Particle Physics, this new result appears to be in disagreement.

In the first few moments of the Universe, the anti-B-mesons might have decayed differently than their regular matter counterparts. By the time all the annihilations were complete, there was still enough matter left over to give us all the stars, planets and galaxies we see today.

_{After decay of anti-matters still they were active in the universe against matter and new particles in combination would be generated when both collide to get mutual destruction. However mesons are particles with negligible mass and they act .}

In the first few moments of the Universe enormous amount of both matter and antimatter? What was before the Universe? These particles must have come to be how? Before the big bang, what was there and where did it come from? This also beg the question when does time begins? 

Is the Big Bang just a period in time?

what was before the big bang is still a BIG question for physicist...

Many of yours questions are still questions....so it is the region of theory which was based on assumption.

I believe ASSUMPTION is what blurs the lines between Science, Filosophy, and Theology. But such are the facts. There is nothing we can do but assume. Therefore the tug of war between science and religion will forever exist. For who is to say who is right?

A Two hundred year life

BBC says it too!

It is my strong belief that it is possible, can be achieved in normal ways, and lead to indefinitely longer life. I am perhaps a month early to Musk who indepently discovered the main idea to indefinite life and researches in the new company Neuralink!

A friend objected to the wish for Two hundred year life on grounds that it would be tiring. Another on grounds it was wished but never shown! How could even that be done, let alone indefinite life!
My plan calls for only 200 year biological life, since the indefinite future life is as an cyborg. I assume that Neuralink or competitor would be successful by end of 21^st century to middle of 22nd. The Real issue is life extension till then. Physical prowess or looks are unimportant then. But physical health and vigor is crucial to live to 120. Means the next required step be done in next 60 years. The last 80 years or longer are from hibernation or advances using tested medicine improvements.

The wish for and research in life extension is as old as humanity as are nay-Sayers who say it can't be done. It is extremely easy to be emfubarred by products with anecdotal even statistical backing. So what then?

Aaqgs-epistemology: Easy for me <TBD why these> – only trust unhackable endorsements by trusties. No need even to argue who there – if any more, their judgments and org will be endorsed by the basic! WHO TRUST in an arena of 99% subhuman-equivalent thugs and ALL adsters? British cochrane and sens. None from USA including CDA.

There is plenty of aaqgs-stupid stuff floating around like this. If you draw natural conclusions here, you join the rank of aaqgs-gone-case-subanimal!

My program – self-applied first - is derived from many ideas

1. People have a tendency to lie, reinterpret, be manipulated. Any majoritarian democractic science is absurd.
   
2. Anecdotal science is always very suspect.
   
3. Statistical data is very easily abused. Only documented and paid counter-experiments are needed. CDA is too easily manipulated in difficult areas.

As we understand the underlying unity of disease mechanisms (major are insulin caused glycation, telomere shortening and free radicals), it makes sense to adopt following plan

1. Ordinary physicians, ECP,  diet and exercise for 95 age.
2. Extra-ordinary in-pipeline meds from age-specialists next 25 years
3. Hibernation or sci fi meds next 80- years
4. Transmission to electronic brains end 21 to mid 22 century
5. Anti-fragile thereafter

Controversy begins

Eukaryote and prokaryote

In nature over all species (bacteria – mammals) are found two kinds of cells – AA-eukaryote is any organism whose cells have a nucleus and other organelles enclosed within membranes. Eukaryotes belong to the taxon Eukarya or Eukaryota; prokaryote have sackless cells, only very low in animal world. DNA is part of nucleus and crucial because of its need in relevant protein synthesis. Prokaryotes multiply by fission.

Even though simple, the prokaryotes may have a wiggly organ outside the cell, allowing it some motion. It helps a lot in making a bacterial film which has even some intelligence by stigmergy!


Why do these entomological terms make sense?

1. They need to be understood for the essential point very difficult for hierarchical human minds to digest - Non-intelligent-id evolution with emergent intelligence!

2. Absolutely needed to understand swarm-intelligence in AI and also emergent reliability and emergent functionality! Human body can fight microbial diseases without intelligence and low level of intelligence (vaidya or hakim or shaman systems) to emergent anti-disease.

Fascinating insights emerge from study of tree-cell from trees with 4000 year life-span - it is difficult to believe  these cells have undergone so many divisions and restorations without sickness!