Strange moons of Saturn

https://phys.org/news/2018-05-history-saturn-small-moons.html#nRlv

Just look at them, how come so weird!

Martin Jutzi and Adrien Leleu, both members of the NCCR PlanetS, took the challenge of calculating the formation process of the small inner moons of Saturn. The first, simple tests worked well. "But then, we took the tidal forces into consideration and the problems piled up," remembers Adrien Leleu. "The conditions close to Saturn are very special," confirms Martin Jutzi. Since Saturn has 95 times more mass than Earth and the inner moons orbit the planet at a distance of less than half the distance between Earth and Moon, the tides are enormous and pull almost everything apart. Therefore, Saturn's inner moons couldn't have formed with these peculiar shapes by gradual accretion of material around a single core. An alternative model called pyramidal regime suggests that these moons were formed by a series of mergers of similar sized little moonlets.

Read more at: https://phys.org/news/2018-05-history-saturn-small-moons.html#jCp

Take away is that sometimes astronomical bodies are formed by merger in special situations (Saturn tides).

Graceful aging: aaquantum scholarly research

What are prospects of fountain of youth in near future?

At a forum on Cape Cod earlier this month, Harvard scientist David Sinclair had the rapt attention of biotech executives and investors as he described treating 20-month-old mice with a molecule to restore their youthfulness. Before long, the geriatric rodents were outracing 2-month-old mice.

Yes, Sinclair told his audience, “We can turn an old mouse into a healthy young mouse.”

The Fountain of Rodent Youth feat, outlined in March in the scientific journal Cell, hasn’t been replicated with humans. But researchers, who have long scoffed at the anti-aging claims made by companies pitching dubious products, are warming to the idea that serious science can be deployed to increase human longevity.

Ambitious efforts are underway in Massachusetts and beyond to develop the first government-approved drugs to stretch healthy life spans. Some researchers are scrambling to repurpose a diabetes medicine to target age-related diseases. Others are working to boost levels of a key protein to increase blood flow and endurance, or to find a way to kill “zombie cells” that can send out toxins that cause age-related maladies.

Arun aaquantum notes

repurpose a diabetes medicine

metformin. Remember latest research says insulin, very useful to 35 turns bad after 45! Most current mm doc were taught wrong!

How long can humans live – some feel not very long!

In the 1960s, Hayflick found that human cells divide only 40 to 60 times, after which they stop — even when their division is paused and then allowed to resume. This discovery, called the Hayflick Limit, indicates that even if a drug like metformin were effective at suspending aging, the end game stays the same.

Shouldn’t someone, likely to die, be allowed treatment wished?

So say conservatives and Trump and US just passed a bill. But it is’nt a simple issue! Other side has good arguments. It is similar to suicide by suffering hopeless terminally ill!

Isn’t aging alleviation in near future by crispr driven gene therapies?

There is no question that if scientists aren’t careful, CRISPR can induce substantial off-target mutations. In another study Joung’s lab submitted to a journal, they show that when “promiscuous” forms of CRISPR were slipped into mice’s livers, as some genome-editing companies hope to do for some human metabolic diseases, it edited hundreds of spots in the mouse genome that it wasn’t supposed to.

by crispr driven gene therapies?

Elementary CS has the answer as I learned in 1976 studying L_systems. Lindenmeyer systems are parallel context sensitive grammars made type-2 by passage of time which can be viewed in onary notation. Problem is simple – crispr allows one to edit-replace sequence of letters of genetic code say CATG to CCAT by changing CAT to CCA, but it does it everywhere even unintended. Not simple but progress made.

Arun aaquantum view
even if a drug like metformin were effective at suspending aging, the end game stays the same
True but error is in assuming that there is no stem cell! Tree cells have shown the way past - a stem cell also divides and the stronger cell lives! That is what transfection does!! I, Arya aaquantum, am still very hopeful of transfection driven anti-aging.

Explored and used interventions?

Metformin
supplementation of three subcycles of krebs cycle
Preventative supplements for gross body objects

Explored, india has advantages

low labor cost
posses real estate
simple operation

Hence 2 week to 2 month medical tourism makes sense - I provide equipment, operator, living, food from dedicated chef - full tour package, turn key basis

Meaningful aging interventions

The three procedures referenced next are
- uniquely addable by me as a non-doctor for upper middle class
- Have existing documented benefits
- Unlikely to have negative effects. Worst is mild benefits!
Thus flooring lazy nincompoops.

- ECP External counterpulsation used to escape stent surgery. My add is reducing costs to enable upper middle class.

- HOT Hyperbaric oxygen therapy - Mayo Clinic commonly used by aging film stars. My add is reducing costs to enable upper middle class.

- Human Parabiosis - Wikipedia but legally - Doable by upper middle class.

Collectively, the mechanisms are disjoint - improved blood flow through angiogenesis, high pressure yoga-like and stem cells. Doing all three should benefit me visibly and empirically documentable. 99.99 readers will view it skeptically and move on! Tough luck!
- 

aaquantum scholarly research

This page is intended to be the end-product of evolutionary developments, imagined to be very substantial but not even penned yet. To be a scientist means to me to be rational skeptic

First requirement is integrity and it will happen as soon as my IBE is done.

Next is skeptic nature of enquiry into decompositions. The whole may be an AND of components or an OR or a NOT. If an OR, single failure does not demolish the theory. Skeptic enquiry may sharpen the region of applicability.  Second order paradoxes are removed without eliminating recursion by requiring that all dependents range over previously defined elements only! Goedel is automatically eliminated - consistency and completeness of a language can not be constructed within! In other words (all x)F and (exist x)F are illegal, one must say (all x in X)F and (exist x in X)F where X are predefined! I call it aaquantum typed logic.

By goal, completeness in not an objective or perhaps even possible. Nor is full consistency - a mechanical way to test arbitrary derivations as being consistent. However, one can define consistency as those sentences derived by consistent applications of consistent axioms. Similarly complete. Skeptical enquiry is required for all statements independent of accepted sets.

This pragmatic outline suffices to constrain my behavior to an aaquantum stoic, free from all known paradoxes, unconstrained but rationally accepting stoic, pragmatic to live, with limited shared effort. The tools are finally here - internet, IBE, middle class comfort. Fuck the legal stupids, entirely new ideology can be constructed, as subset of current law till the end. The goal is simple enough - an aaquantum-stoic can not be cheated - politically, seller, friend, colleague, law etc!

aaquantum means discussed evolution, enforcement without appeal to good nature, responsible crime abatement etc. Different laws of 'guilty unless proved innocent' apply to specified minority: repeat offenders, celebrities and inspectors where honey traps can be officially used.

First interstellar immigrant discovered in the solar system – aaquantum research summary

Q. How can one say, within aaquantum-epistemology, that a discovered denizen of our soloar system was captured from another star?

A. We turn to the formation of solar system! It grew from a rotating formation cloud in which gravity constructed various planets at various distances all rotating in the same plane in the same direction, while the centre grew in mass, started fusion, and became the sun. Prior to the formation of planets, a nearby super nova has seeded the cloud with some post-iron elements.

Empirics?

All the planets are measured in same plane, rotating in the same direction.

The oort cloud?

Elements past Neptune were too far away and could feel gravity of near by stars. They collected as a sphere of icy bodies with very elongated tracks in noparticular plane. We know them as comets!

Retrograde motion?

Some bodies near jupitor in the asteroid belt do not spin like planets in plane and same direction.6500 do but 100 do not! They are interesting objects! Most are lkly captures from the oort cloud by Sir Jupiter, itself a failed star!

Extra-solar?

One retrograde guy is special. Its orbit was computed in detail, enough precisely that one could project it back 4 billion years. It stayed true that long! It could not come from oort cloud, it could not have condensed. That, as Sherlock would say, leaves only capture from nearby star. A plausible low probability story.

https://phys.org/news/2017-06-stable-retrograde-orbit-bee-zed-asteroid.html

Proton innards

What does innards of a proton look like? We know of three quarks held by strong nuclear force. Is more info possible? yes!

Inside every proton in every atom in the universe is a pressure cooker environment that surpasses the atom-crushing heart of a neutron star. That's according to the first measurement of a mechanical property of subatomic particles, the pressure distribution inside the proton, which was carried out by scientists at the Department of Energy's Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility.

THE epistemological problem – aaquantum scholarly research

John Locke

The epistemological  problem is simple i.e. who to believe. It is central to a human. Their many ways are conflicting and cannot coexist. What I have wanted is low cost & effort unhackable way to yield a 67%(2/3) or better solution always!

The following are subhuman ejects anyway (reasons NOT discusses, what follows is POINTLESS for those wh0o so believe) – religion, used car salesmen, doctors, friends, politicians, lawyers etc. The people I address are sceptics who wish to understand and when & what is rational. Unlike a true skeptic, further investigations are NOT done somehow and claims casting doubts are rejected as well. There is close connection between my goals and best of law, except that there is no constitution and historical evolution.

Unhackability is very crucial but avoided entirely here since zillions times better than best human systems can be constructed using IBE encryption extended aaquantum. Many legal practices are quaint zillions of times worse, only existing since an aaquantum ideology has not established a superior state. We posit (as elsewhere) that aqaquantum authorities exist answerable and accountable to many more aaquantum authorities, and that their decisions can reach me without hacking.

First observation is that epistemological needs can be divided in most cases into mutually non-conflicting categories easily by a target (of my work) and in conflicting cases, the aaquantum-decision can be safely followed. So the aaquantum-epistemology can be a construction over many subject-epistemologies. Evolution is my choice in development of aaquantum epistemology. Detection of a fatal flaw in one sub-epistemology does not render most other parts inoperative. Goedelean work shows that fatal flaws CAN be found system-wide. Given that no one as Goedel existed for 3000 years and that no one as him has reappeared since his work about century ago, it is reasonable to argue that my work will live thousands of years – freedom from Goedel, scepticism of another Goedel, safe evolution.

Each of my epistemology follows this pattern – decide on own based on general principles, ask when not clear (unhackable internet, perhaps a conversation). It clearly was not possible before 2000 (internet, IBE) and hence any moron who argues for aspects in Qing dynasty is an idiot without wasting more time. How many distinct ideologies have grown after 2000? Isn’t aaquantum special if it coheres? Conflict with any other ideology is irrelevant as long as it is coherent. What is MORE important is practical completeness – 90% of ALL questions and 90% of all important ones, in 90% of endeavour!

So what is scholarly research? An essay where all important transitions are either simple to understand, or html pointers to relevant research or paper. I speak much on some topics of interest to me – quantum mechanics, astronomy, cosmogony, aging, development of diseases, identity encryption, identity, unhackability, secure sharing, evolve-able software. None of my targets need to understand details but they can if so interested. My critics can attack me or references. Above is not referenced as I think my targets know my mastery in unhackability and know evolution and Goedel

TBD = To Be Done

TBD quantum mechanics – scholarly aaquantum research

TBD astronomy – scholarly aaquantum research

TBD aging – scholarly aaquantum research

TBD development of diseases – scholarly aaquantum research

TBD identity encryption – scholarly aaquantum research

TBD identity – scholarly aaquantum research

TBD unhackability – scholarly aaquantum research

TBD secure sharing – scholarly aaquantum research

TBD evolve-able software – scholarly aaquantum research

Towards my first patent application – aaquantum scholarly research

f

Goal is to research devnagri fontCode and patent it. What is roman fontCode? Embedding imperceptible information in documents by unconscious perturbations in font used for printing. A book has random changes any way due to imperfections of press. Restricting deliberate changes to selected positions makes the code impossible to detect since codes can be misbroken so that any message can be found in any book!

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2018/05/180510150231.htm

The idea of other languages has occurred to the authors but in reality they are likely weak competitors! Perhaps colleagues here can suggest bell and whistles, or newer uses. The list of

Applications outside spycraft in paper is very small! In fact, I can even think of applications in honey-trap of students mis-doing their assignments by putting questions on internet for bids!