Friday, December 30, 2022

Dr ARYA Theory of Aging – scholarly unification of mechanism




Dr. Sinclair
(https://youtu.be/eUWYpGab-wM Must type/link this URL if failure in link).
Link content useful but not relevant. Link there to allow people to watch 52 year old Dr. Sinclair. Not true, unbelievable, but my claim 31 years.

The latest link

 

None of my writings on aging are tolerant because I consider my time very valuable, so fuck opponents, partial objectors, politicians, and pseudo-friends, drop this and be an idiot, learn nothing. There definitely are improvements, and they require reading, learning, and then suggesting improvements by explicit reference of improver (by improver, me) reference.

 

My basis of acceptable sources

 

It is definitely not doctors or FDA. I consider Aging a disease. It can be fixed by supplements. If any good, the recommendations must be self-improvement (by proponents, as all age) In the short run and unlikely to have long-term ill effects. I look 50 at age 68, and my hero Dr. Sinclair looks 31 at 52, both consume their own recommendations and illness drugs.

 

Scholar versus science

 

Only experiments or repeatedly confirmed observations are admitted in each. Hence falsifiability defines both. A scientist performs experiments and postulates mechanisms. A scholar devises a theory of unified mechanism.

 

Science

 

It is based on extensive reading, understanding, and questioning since 2000. Like science, empirical experimental concepts and explicit mechanism theories all the way to cosmology with a total boycott of experience, saintliness, religion, and faith is required, unless accepted solely for reasons of lack of self-test by other generally considered scientists only. 

 

Scholar

 

Generally, to ignore all pseudo-self-proclaimed or like subhumans. A useful trick I follow is to ignore all forever who have achieved any past pseudo-science notoriety and have not recanted.

 

Which mad god originated aging for all humans and most animals?

 

None did. All life on earth is a collection of one or more cells. Sub-life are viruses that act like salts until they invade cells and take over the replication machinery. All diseases are caused by small life, viruses, and physical processes. One can divide illnesses modeled by some live particle and its destruction, clinically tested medicine and food in modern medicine, or effects on virtual fluids (pitta, etc.) and pain centers in Ayurveda, Unani, roman, Chinese, etc. medical systems, and false dangerous criminal techniques of homeopathy. Each medical system except modern is plagued by unknown chances. Some yoga and some physical systems target aging (proven) and are excluded as not medicine. Illness is universal in geography and time; all others are clubbed together as stupid shamans. Old age solely is an evolutionary imperative that is short life for populations that evolve faster even though fought valiantly by individuals, for population benefit. The few animals that live on as they are at the top of the food chain, die eventually of cancer and have not developed anti-aging at all.

 

What is special re humans?

 

Humans developed written language for recording experiences conjoining them beyond individuals to sets, and speech for fast complex communication. This enabled them to use fire and wheel. Taming of animals beyond just food, and agriculture led to housing and villages and slow communication between villages. Humans are special due to language and speech leading to ant-aging since 2010.

 

How does the field of Aging improve?

 

Science and scholarship are clearly distinct means. A scholar is not required to investigate by experiment. Instead, responsible for splicing several isolated facts together to determine a common mechanism. Equally common is creating unbridgeable gaps between mechanisms of the fact set. Both are distinct from unbridgeable plain empiricism which does not state a mechanism. Both lead to theories of mechanism which lead to new facts – a scientist examines them while a scholar just posits them.

 

The extended hyperfunction theory?

 

There are many isolated interventions that lead to provable improvement of age. 99.9% of doctors are aging idiots still believing in don’t know or telomere idiocy. The entire commercial aging fix process meets scientific standards but is very incomplete. A case is E5. It has led to life extension. Showed by rats. Continued treatment beyond the initial age gain does not happen. Perhaps by dosing better, the gain may be improved. It does not meet my standards of mechanism. Even the best aging doctors state that their method is the basic aging method.

 

Extended hyperfunction theory?

 

I wish to reuse the word singularity by appending it. I use age-reset to imply that age is permanently improved and can be re-improved by repeating the method. Age-gain is not exciting as age-reset is. E5 led to age-gain, likely further improvable by current new does but I assume it will not lead to reset unless proven otherwise.

 

Dr. Arya's selections?

 

Based on the mechanism of action, I have 4 classes, each disjoint, and each necessary. All four act individually without a common clock, so while each has reset methods since death arrives by whichever fails first, all have to be worked on.

 

1.     Bottom-up reductions within a cell on DNA

2.     Top-down organ fix methods

3.     Restore immunity methods

4.     Cell-division telomere methods

    otherwise

    senolysis

 

The urgency of the method?

 

1. Bottom-up methods deal with DNA-based error recovery that otherwise leads to cell failure or becoming an inappropriate cell What is more, apoptosis ignoring failed cell destroys neighbors. That leads to a positive feedback failure cascade, Best handled by NAD+ precursors and vitamin k2.

OSK methods help.

 

2. senolysis


3. others


4. Top-down organ problems, handled by stem-cell. Depends on the organ affected. Hyaluronic acid for skin, nails, etc. (rub liposome or ingest as liposome)

 

5. Immune system destruction fat-converted thymus that happens by 60. Existing white cells live but are not replaced, total; total loss by age 85!

 

6. Telomere methods like HBOT are the lowest priority.


New Direction


Aging control is likely to be the biggest service industry rest of this century after singularity-reset with true age-reset by 2030. Most of it will be education. The second vital industry. close second will be organ preservation, vital to the extension of life by yet undone medical procedures. This will enable people to benefit from still-alive cadaver parts, distant travel like new planets and moons (beyond the solar system in million years), and rebirth in grown-self-external-bodies with brain-transplant. (Grown -external self to solve the organ-compatibility problem). All of this leads to singularity-non-violence by the end of the century. The need for a fit body can not be met by reinventing the current body repeatedly.


Organ transplant and singularity-non-violence?


The singularity Arises from Dr. Arya's method in all disruptions which are


1. An immediate need is solved by some new method

2. So funded, the method is applied to new needs by method experts

3. The new application becomes a new disruptive industry

4. The growth is shielded by some first-mover advantage


By this analysis, the century-end singularity-non-violence will be one of the developments from organ shipping.


Unification


The following results are believed and their mechanism has been unified.


1. bottom up


a} Dr. Sinclair precursors of NAD+, Vitamin K2, D3, Reservetrol

b) Dr. Kennedy

c) OSK methods at Stanford


2. Top-down


a) stem cells

b) HBOT

c) Molecular weights based E5


3. Immunity based


a) Dr. Fahy's work on igf-1

b ) CAR T  cell developments on white cells


4. Telomere


a) HBOT


5. others MTOR - AMPK +


a) Metformin

b) rapamycin


6. senolysis


a) spermidine

b) Fisetin

c) quercetin

...


Tuesday, December 6, 2022

Consecuencias tras el paso de la inmortalidad

Consecuencias tras el paso de la inmortalidad

  Qué pasa cuando uno cree como yo que es posible un camino científico hacia la inmortalidad, y se da el primer paso. Vamos a decodificar esto. Científico implica que sólo se admiten verdades verificadas experimentalmente. Va perfectamente con mi creencia de que sólo el conservadurismo científico tiene mucho sentido. El conservadurismo implica verdadero respeto por el pasado y la experiencia, a menos que la ciencia demuestre un error en la creencia y se sienta una perturbación. Eso es suficiente para descartar el racismo, el sexismo (la mayoría), la discriminación por edad y otras creencias irrelevantes. Las creencias veganas o vegetarianas resultan de la propia salud y no de motivos religiosos o culturales. De hecho, los Inuit son bienvenidos a su estilo de vida. Un científico tiene derecho a decirles que se necesita un cambio por razones de salud, y pueden ignorarlo. Todos han muerto antes que yo. Yo también debo hacerlo por conservadurismo. ¡Pero eso no es científico para mí!

La muerte es un evento desagradable en la mayoría de las vidas. La respuesta estándar en la mayoría de los casos es la ignorancia, el religiosismo o el trabajo heredado. En mi caso, además del análisis de los modos de fracaso y la eliminación inteligente de las amenazas, una fuerte consecuencia es pagar las deudas que siento con mi patria India y mi patria EE.UU. La ignorancia está bien. Lanzaré una startup en mayo de 2023. Creo que mi cóctel variable funcionará para la mayoría de las personas y podré ofrecer un seguro legal de que 1 año de mi cuidado reducirá la edad del ADN del cliente en 1 año. Creo firmemente que dado que creo que mi ganancia es de más de 10 años, la promesa de 1 año será sólida. Hay pocos requisitos onerosos.

Dada la verdadera jubilación y sin prisas por objetivos dependientes del tiempo, tengo la intención de dedicar tiempo a avanzar en mi filosofía de convergencia en la que los humanos biológicos convergerán en una fusión cerebral con partes de cyborg que ya desarrollan sus sentidos. ¿Qué puede ser una teoría científica para tales seres? ¿Puede mi conservadurismo científico evolucionar hacia él?

¿Qué es la disrupción? Es lo mismo que una revolución pero aplicable a la economía, al conocimiento, etc. Es lo contrario a la evolución. La evolución en sí misma es una secuencia de posibles interrupciones a lo largo del tiempo. Muy pocas evoluciones son cambios sin interrupciones durante mucho tiempo.

El principal resultado para mí es el momento de abordar la principal dificultad de mi vida, TBI.

----------------------------------





https://qtxasset.com/quartz/qcloud1/media/image/2016-11/nuevas-experiencias.jpg

enlace a lo último

Por mucho que me felicite, la experiencia autoclínica es poco común pero es un método tradicional en medicina para médicos revolucionarios. Lo que me hace muy diferente es que no soy médico. La enfermedad que ataco ni siquiera se considera una, el envejecimiento. Los subhumanos niegan que alguna vez será derrotado por la medicina que funciona para todos, los que odian la religión y todos los demás involucrados en actividades santas, así como impíos como yo. Una sustancia química que derrota una enfermedad es cómo defino la medicina después de la afirmación de que el envejecimiento es una enfermedad y que afecta a todos los humanos y a la mayoría de los animales, no le otorga el estado de un proceso natural de no intervención. Mi cóctel de drogas me permite vivir hasta la singularidad 1 en el camino hacia la inmortalidad. Las singularidades superiores no me obligarán al riesgo extraordinario que asumí y sufriré todos los días hasta 2030, mi estimación de singularidad. Estoy listo para ser derrotado, pero solo luchando duro por el resto de mi vida, muerto solo por desconocidos incognoscibles.

Todavía no he terminado, conceptualmente después de que una prueba simple funcionó en mi mente, pero se solidificó por completo en mayo de 2023. Mi prueba simple es mi aspecto envejecido para 7 extraños. ¡Sin ninguna disputa, reclaman 50-60! Si me gusta su respuesta, le enviaré una foto mía reciente y por qué me siento de 50 años. Nadie me cree cuando afirmo que tengo 68. En abril de 2023, voy a los EE. UU. y me someto a una prueba de ADN. Si 50-60 declaro mi método correcto. ¡Tengo la intención de contratar médicos de MBBS y formar la primera empresa con una garantía de prueba de ADN de reducción de edad de 1 año por año! ¡Hazlo lo suficiente y sé inmortal, envejeciendo! Todavía mueres por enfermedades fatales contraídas, accidentes o violencia. ¡Pero no del envejecimiento! El nombre en sí tiene 1. La prueba post-DNAm será 2.

Claro después de mi prueba autoclínica son estos

0 La autoevaluación es superior a las pruebas clínicas para la medicina del envejecimiento. No ser médico significa no tener acceso a las inyecciones. Brillantemente (según las consecuencias) elegí liposomas todo.

1 Mi técnica para encontrar dominadores de las características del envejecimiento es correcta.

2 Mi afirmación es que los productos químicos de actualización de envejecimiento son lo suficientemente extraños como para no interactuar con los productos químicos de alimentos o medicamentos ingeridos, y parece funcionar para mí.

3. También se mantiene mi creencia de que cada medicamento que envejece es indiferente a los demás. Esto significa que los medicamentos para una forma de envejecimiento agregan beneficios. Este es el caso de elidir productos químicos también. No parece haber beneficios sinérgicos.

4 Eludir algunos favoritos de algunos médicos sobre la base de algunos argumentos sobre cómo funcionan y restringir los productos químicos que pueden interferir entre sí parece haber funcionado, pero puede que no funcione para otros.

5 Fui vacunado con Covid 3 veces y normalmente me enfermé muchas veces. Ninguno de los medicamentos interfirió con el cóctel de envejecimiento. Estaba listo para detener el cóctel de envejecimiento si sentía alguna diferencia. No hice. Incluía una infección en el pene por un medicamento para la diabetes.

6 Si bien mi cóctel funciona para mí, es posible que no funcione para otros médicos o pacientes.

El fracaso del cóctel para mis problemas cardíacos, diabetes, osteoartritis, problemas cerebrales residuales y autoexamen parece sugerir cuatro cobeneficios insignificantes del cóctel. Significa que la teoría correcta del envejecimiento son medicamentos de cuatro campos: células madre de arriba hacia abajo cuando E5 madura, ADN/mitocondrias de abajo hacia arriba cuando madura el Dr. Sinclar 626. Los medicamentos del factor Yamanaka, restauran la inmunidad por la hormona del crecimiento y controlan simultáneamente la diabetes causada y reparan los telómeros usando la dosis adecuada de TOHB. Cada uno parece ser independiente de los demás. Además de estos, es útil la recolección de basura en la apoptosis ignorando las células muertas/malignas usando espermidina, fisetina y otros productos químicos similares.

Por lo tanto, el cóctel ideal aumentará la AMPk y las sirutinas, reducirá la mTOR y aumentará la igf-1, reduciendo así la mTOR proporcionalmente, trabajando para prolongar la vida de las células madre y haciéndolas utilizables a través de una extensión de telómeros basada en HBOT. Varios médicos trabajaron en piezas pequeñas e insinuaron incorrectamente que la suya era la única forma de entender el envejecimiento. Mi teoría del envejecimiento es mía, similar a la teoría de la hiperfunción extendida, y cree que hay varios tipos de procesos de envejecimiento a la vez, la muerte ocurre por el proceso más rápido y los químicos dañinos son los saludables de la vida adulta, peligrosos en la vejez. Ninguna cantidad de selección de sangre joven entregará proteínas mágicas. La dilución de sangre simple funcionará.

Este es sólo un paso hacia la inmortalidad. Cabe destacar la conquista de la mayoría de los cánceres fatales (mata a todos los animales sin edad), el comienzo de la victoria mediante la reintroducción de células programadas en el laboratorio y la violencia a través de la carga del cerebro (también viajes sin edad a las estrellas).

Consecuencias de la autodeterminación del camino a la inmortalidad

  Qué pasa cuando uno cree como yo que es posible un camino científico hacia la inmortalidad, y se da el primer paso. Vamos a decodificar esto. Científico implica que sólo se admiten verdades verificadas experimentalmente. Va perfectamente con mi creencia de que sólo el conservadurismo científico tiene mucho sentido. El conservadurismo implica verdadero respeto por el pasado y la experiencia, a menos que la ciencia demuestre un error en la creencia y se sienta una perturbación. Eso es suficiente para descartar el racismo, el sexismo (la mayoría), la discriminación por edad y otras creencias irrelevantes. Las creencias veganas o vegetarianas resultan de la propia salud y no de motivos religiosos o culturales. De hecho, los Inuit son bienvenidos a su estilo de vida. Un científico tiene derecho a decirles que se necesita un cambio por razones de salud, y pueden ignorarlo.

La muerte es un evento desagradable en la mayoría de las vidas. La respuesta estándar en la mayoría de los casos es la ignorancia, el religiosismo o el trabajo heredado. En mi caso, además del análisis de los modos de fracaso y la eliminación inteligente de las amenazas, una fuerte consecuencia es pagar las deudas que siento con mi patria India y mi patria EE.UU. La ignorancia está bien. Lanzaré una startup en mayo de 2023. Creo que mi cóctel variable funcionará para la mayoría de las personas y podré ofrecer un seguro legal de que 1 año de mi cuidado reducirá la edad del ADN del cliente en 1 año. Creo firmemente que dado que creo que mi ganancia es de más de 10 años, la promesa de 1 año será sólida. Hay pocos requisitos onerosos.

Dada la verdadera jubilación y sin prisas por objetivos dependientes del tiempo, tengo la intención de dedicar tiempo a avanzar en mi filosofía de convergencia en la que los humanos biológicos convergerán en una fusión cerebral con partes de cyborg que ya desarrollan sus sentidos. ¿Qué puede ser una teoría científica para tales seres? ¿Puede mi conservadurismo científico evolucionar hacia él?

¿Qué es la disrupción? Es lo mismo que una revolución pero aplicable a la economía, al conocimiento, etc. Es lo contrario a la evolución. La evolución en sí misma es una secuencia de posibles interrupciones a lo largo del tiempo. Muy pocas evoluciones son cambios sin interrupciones durante mucho tiempo.

El principal resultado para mí es el momento de abordar la principal dificultad de mi vida, TBI.

Cómo usar la recompensa

Empecé a ser mucho más cauteloso y aumenté mucho el estoicismo: ¡los que hablan mierda simplemente se pintan a sí mismos con mierda y no pueden ofenderme a menos que esté sólidamente protegido y luego sonrío burlonamente! La única vez que importa es cuando el discurso está dirigido a alguien que me importa y luego me dirijo a la otra audiencia.

Friday, October 28, 2022

Consequences of self-determination of path to immortality


Link to latest

 What happens when one believes like me that a scientific path to immortality is possible, and the first step is taken. Let's decode this. Scientific implies only experimentally verified truths are admitted. It goes perfectly with my belief that only scientific conservatism makes welt sense. Conservatism implies true respect for the past and experience unless science demonstrates an error in belief and disruption is felt. That is enough to dismiss racism, sexism (most), ageism, and other irrelevant beliefs. Vegan or vegetarian beliefs result from self-health and not religious or cultural reasons. In fact, Inuit are welcome to their lifestyle. A scientist has the right to tell them a change is needed for health reasons, and they are welcome to ignore it. Everyone has died before me. By conservatism so must I. But that is not scientific for me!

Death is an unpleasant event in most lives. The standard response in most cases is ignoration, religionism, or legacy work. In my case, apart from the analysis of modes of failure and intelligent removal of threats, a strong consequence is to repay the debts I feel to my motherland India and my fatherland USA. Ignoration is fine. I will launch a startup in May 2023. I believe that my varying cocktail will work for most people and I will be able to offer legal insurance that 1 year of my care will reduce the customer DNAm age over 1 year. I believe that strongly since I think my gain is over 10 years, the promise of 1 year will be sound. There are few onerous requirements.

Given true retirement and no rush of time-dependent objectives, I intend to spend time advancing my convergence philosophy in which biological humans will converge in a brain-meld with cyborg parts that already advance their senses. What can be a scientific theory for such beings? Can my scientific conservatism evolve into it?

What is disruption? It is the same as a revolution but applicable to economics, knowledge, etc. It is the opposite of evolution. Evolution itself is a sequence of possible disruptions over time. Very few evolutions are disruption-free changes over a long time.

The main result for me is time to address the main difficulty in my life, TBI.

----------------------------------



https://qtxasset.com/quartz/qcloud1/media/image/2016-11/new-experiences.jpg

link to the latest

No matter how much I congratulate myself, self-clinical experience is uncommon but is a traditional method in medicine for revolutionary doctors. What makes me very different is that I am not a doctor. The disease I attack is not even considered one, aging. Subhumans deny it will be ever defeated by medicine that works for all, religion haters, and all others involved in saintly pursuits as well as ungodly like me. A chemical that defeats an illness is how medicine is defined by me after the claim that aging is a disease, and that it afflicts all humans and most animals, does not grant it the status of a natural hands-off process. My cocktail of drugs enables me to live to singularity 1 on the path to immortality. Higher singularities will not require me to the extraordinary risk I undertook and will suffer every day until 2030, my estimate of singularity. I am quite ready to be defeated, but only fighting hard for the rest of my life, dead only by unknown unknowables.

I am not done yet, conceptually after a simple test works in my mind but solidified fully in May of 2023. My simple test is my look aged to 7 total strangers. Without any dispute, they claim 50-60! If I like your reply, I will send you a recent photo of me and why I feel 50, No one believes me when I claim 68. In April of 2023, I go to the USA and submit to a DNAm test. If 50-60 I  declare my method correct. I intend to hire MBBS doctors and form the first company with a DNAm test guarantee of age reduction of 1 year per year! Do it enough and be immortal, age-wise! You still die from contracted fatal diseases, accidents, or violence. But not from aging! The name itself has 1. The post-DNAm test will be 2.

Clear after my self-clinical test are these

0 Self-test is superior to clinical testing for aging medicine. Not being a doctor means no access to injections. I brilliantly (as per consequences) chose liposome everything.

1 My technique of finding dominators of hallmarks of aging is correct.

2 My claim is that the aging update chemicals are weird enough to not interact with food or medicine chemicals ingested, and seems to work for me.

3. My belief that each aging drug is indifferent to others also holds. This means that drugs for one form of aging add benefits. This is the case for eliding chemicals too. There seem to be no synergistic benefits.

4 Eliding some favorites of some doctors on grounds of some arguments on how they work and restricting chemicals that may interfere with one another seems to have worked, but may not work for others.

5  I was Covid Vaccinated 3 times and became normally sick many times. None of the medicines interfered with the aging cocktail. I was all set to stop the aging cocktail if I felt any difference. I did not. It included a penis infection from a diabetes drug.

6 While my cocktail works for me, it may not for other doctors and or patients.

The failure of the cocktail for my heart troubles, diabetes, osteoarthritis,  residual brain problems, and self-examination seems to suggest four insignificant co-benefits of the cocktail. It means that the right theory of aging is medicines from four camps - topdown stem cells when E5 matures, bottom-up fix DNA/mitochondria when Dr. Sinclar 626 matures. Yamanaka factor drugs, restore immunity by growth hormone and simultaneous control of diabetes caused and fix telomere using proper HBOT dosing. Each seems to be independent of the others. Besides these, garbage collection on apoptosis ignoring dead/malignant cells using spermidine, fisetin and other similar chemicals are useful.

Thus ideal cocktail will boost AMPk and Sirutins, reduce mTOR, and boost igf-1 thus reducing mTOR proportionately, working on prolonging stem cell life and making them usable through, an HBOT-based telomere extension. Several doctors worked on small pieces and incorrectly implied that theirs the only way to understand aging. My aging theory is mine, similar to extended hyperfunction theory, and believes that there are several kinds of aging processes at once, death happens from the fastest process, and evil chemicals are healthy ones of adult life, dangerous in old age. No amount of selecting young blood will deliver magic proteins. Simple blood dilution will work.

This is only one step to immortality. Noteworthy is the conquest of most fatal cancers (kills all age-less animals), win starting through the reintroduction of lab-programmed cells, and violence through brain-upload (also ageless travel to stars).

Consequences of self-determination of the path to immortality

 What happens when one believes like me that a scientific path to immortality is possible, and the first step is taken. Let's decode this. Scientific implies only experimentally verified truths are admitted. It goes perfectly with my belief that only scientific conservatism makes welt sense. Conservatism implies true respect for the past and experience unless science demonstrates an error in belief and disruption is felt. That is enough to dismiss racism, sexism (most), ageism, and other irrelevant beliefs. Vegan or vegetarian beliefs result from self-health and not religious or cultural reasons. In fact, Inuit are welcome to their lifestyle. A scientist has the right to tell them a change is needed for health reasons, and they are welcome to ignore it.

Death is an unpleasant event in most lives. The standard response in most cases is ignoration, religionism, or legacy work. In my case, apart from the analysis of modes of failure and intelligent removal of threats, a strong consequence is to repay the debts I feel to my motherland India and my fatherland USA. Ignoration is fine. I will launch a startup in May 2023. I believe that my varying cocktail will work for most people and I will be able to offer legal insurance that 1 year of my care will reduce the customer DNAm age over 1 year. I believe that strongly since I think my gain is over 10 years, the promise of 1 year will be sound. There are few onerous requirements.

Given true retirement and no rush of time-dependent objectives, I intend to spend time advancing my convergence philosophy in which biological humans will converge in a brain-meld with cyborg parts that already advance their senses. What can be a scientific theory for such beings? Can my scientific conservatism evolve into it?

What is disruption? It is the same as a revolution but applicable to economics, knowledge, etc. It is the opposite of evolution. Evolution itself is a sequence of possible disruptions over time. Very few evolutions are disruption-free changes over a long time.

The main result for me is time to address the main difficulty in my life, TBI.

How to use the bounty

I have started to be a lot more cautious and greatly increased stoicism -  the shit-talkers simply paint themselves with shit and can't offend me unless I am solidly protected and then I just derisively smile!  The only time it matters is when the speech is directed to someone I care about and then I address the other audience.

Saturday, October 22, 2022

my experience 1



https://qtxasset.com/quartz/qcloud1/media/image/2016-11/new-experiences.jpg

link to the latest

No matter how much I congratulate myself, self-clinical experience is uncommon but is a traditional method in medicine for revolutionary doctors. What makes me very different is that I am not a doctor. The disease I attack is not even considered one, aging. Subhumans deny it will be ever defeated by medicine that works for all, religion haters, and all others involved in saintly pursuits as well as ungodly like me. A chemical that defeats an illness is how medicine is defined by me after the claim that aging is a disease, and that it afflicts all humans and most animals, does not grant it the status of a natural hands-off process. My cocktail of drugs enables me to live to singularity 1 on the path to immortality. Higher singularities will not require me to the extraordinary risk I undertook and will suffer every day until 2030, my estimate of singularity. I am quite ready to be defeated, but only fighting hard for the rest of my life, dead only by unknown unknowables.

I am not done yet, conceptually after a simple test works in my mind but solidified fully in May of 2023. My simple test is my look aged to 7 total strangers. Without any dispute, they claim 50-60! If I like your reply, I will send you a recent photo of me and why I feel 50, No one believes me when I claim 68. In April of 2023, I go to the USA and submit to a DNAm test. If 50-60 I  declare my method correct. I intend to hire MBBS doctors and form the first company with a DNAm test guarantee of age reduction of 1 year per year! Do it enough and be immortal, age-wise! You still die from contracted fatal diseases, accidents, or violence. But not from aging! The name itself has 1. The post-DNAm test will be 2.

Clear after my self-clinical test are these

0 Self-test is superior to clinical testing for aging medicine. Not being a doctor means no access to injections. I brilliantly (as per consequences) chose liposome everything.

1 My technique of finding dominators of hallmarks of aging is correct.

2 My claim is that the aging update chemicals are weird enough to not interact with food or medicine chemicals ingested, and seems to work for me.

3. My belief that each aging drug is indifferent to others also holds. This means that drugs for one form of aging add benefits. This is the case for eliding chemicals too. There seem to be no synergistic benefits.

4 Eliding some favorites of some doctors on grounds of some arguments on how they work and restricting chemicals that may interfere with one another seems to have worked, but may not work for others.

5  I was Covid Vaccinated 3 times and became normally sick many times. None of the medicines interfered with the aging cocktail. I was all set to stop the aging cocktail if I felt any difference. I did not. It included a penis infection from a diabetes drug.

6 While my cocktail works for me, it may not for other doctors and or patients.

The failure of the cocktail for my heart troubles, diabetes, osteoarthritis,  residual brain problems, and self-examination seems to suggest four insignificant co-benefits of the cocktail. It means that the right theory of aging is medicines from four camps - topdown stem cells when E5 matures, bottom-up fix DNA/mitochondria when Dr. Sinclar 626 matures. Yamanaka factor drugs, restore immunity by growth hormone and simultaneous control of diabetes caused and fix telomere using proper HBOT dosing. Each seems to be independent of the others. Besides these, garbage collection on apoptosis ignoring dead/malignant cells using spermidine, fisetin and other similar chemicals are useful.

Thus ideal cocktail will boost AMPk and Sirutins, reduce mTOR, and boost igf-1 thus reducing mTOR proportionately, working on prolonging stem cell life and making them usable through, an HBOT-based telomere extension. Several doctors worked on small pieces and incorrectly implied that theirs the only way to understand aging. My aging theory is mine, similar to extended hyperfunction theory, and believes that there are several kinds of aging processes at once, death happens from the fastest process, and evil chemicals are healthy ones of adult life, dangerous in old age. No amount of selecting young blood will deliver magic proteins. Simple blood dilution will work.

This is only one step to immortality. Noteworthy is the conquest of most fatal cancers (kills all age-less animals), win starting through the reintroduction of lab-programmed cells, and violence through brain-upload (also ageless travel to stars).

Consequences of self-determination of the path to immortality

 What happens when one believes like me that a scientific path to immortality is possible, and the first step is taken. Let's decode this. Scientific implies only experimentally verified truths are admitted. It goes perfectly with my belief that only scientific conservatism makes welt sense. Conservatism implies true respect for the past and experience unless science demonstrates an error in belief and disruption is felt. That is enough to dismiss racism, sexism (most), ageism, and other irrelevant beliefs. Vegan or vegetarian beliefs result from self-health and not religious or cultural reasons. In fact, Inuit are welcome to their lifestyle. A scientist has the right to tell them a change is needed for health reasons, and they are welcome to ignore it.

Death is an unpleasant event in most lives. The standard response in most cases is ignoration, religionism, or legacy work. In my case, apart from the analysis of modes of failure and intelligent removal of threats, a strong consequence is to repay the debts I feel to my motherland India and my fatherland USA. Ignoration is fine. I will launch a startup in May 2023. I believe that my varying cocktail will work for most people and I will be able to offer legal insurance that 1 year of my care will reduce the customer DNAm age over 1 year. I believe that strongly since I think my gain is over 10 years, the promise of 1 year will be sound. There are few onerous requirements.

Given true retirement and no rush of time-dependent objectives, I intend to spend time advancing my convergence philosophy in which biological humans will converge in a brain-meld with cyborg parts that already advance their senses. What can be a scientific theory for such beings? Can my scientific conservatism evolve into it?

What is disruption? It is the same as a revolution but applicable to economics, knowledge, etc. It is the opposite of evolution. Evolution itself is a sequence of possible disruptions over time. Very few evolutions are disruption-free changes over a long time.

The main result for me is time to address the main difficulty in my life, TBI.

How to use the bounty

I have started to be a lot more cautious and greatly increased stoicism -  the shit-talkers simply paint themselves with shit and can't offend me unless I am solidly protected and then I just derisively smile!  The only time it matters is when the speech is directed to someone I care about and then I address the other audience.

Saturday, October 8, 2022

Amazon


Amazon computer buy

 

To all it may concern

Amazon computer buy

 


page1image29292880

This is pic 3 under moving pic in amazon description, copy as above. This is what I expect. Missing are

Asus pen with tips keyboard, cover stand. Please find and send or cancel order since I think cannot compel you without effort and costs