Thursday, March 29, 2018

Knowing self and my future




The reason why my epistemology is science, not any religion or belief system, is the rational skeptic or rational stoic (restricting doubts to non-self-addressable contexts for many reasons) but forces me (gladly and post-retirement usefully) to address rather simple minded unanswerable-looking questions like

0.       What is science and why does it work? (Rational-Skepticism & sharing, total disbelief in history)
1.       How do I believe things are same in other parts of the Universe (Video above)
2.       Why are the constants in physics really the same in eons (answered = processes billions of years ago are same and predictable using current values)
3.       Where and how did the elements come form (nova and supernova)
4.       Why do atoms behave as they do (answered in terms of protons etc)
5.       Why do protons. Neutrons etc. behave as they do (answered in terms of quarks, leptons and bosons with Higgs and quantum fields)
6.       What is dark-matter(verlinde says fix low gravity) and dark-energy (quantum vacuum-energy)
7.       Why is anything there (proto-atom or big bounce) – video above
8.       Where did matter come from and how (supernova)?
9.       What is aging? (Pileup of mitochondrial damage)

10.   How to reduce it effects (artificial add of co-factors to kreb’s cycle).
11.   How to tell apart criminal supplement sellers and idiots!
12.   Who to trust (SENS, Cochrane), semi-trust (Ramdev for purity but NOT for medicine or yoga!) and distrust (all advertisers).
13.   How will life-extension happen (transfection, stem-cells, redundant-regenesis)
Issue zero defines me and why! Science is open skepticism of all except those admitted for rational reasons. It works for belief, superiorly in health (question even doctors and systems like Ayurveda) but poorly for purchases and friendship. Many issues CAN be solved by aaquantum-truth, aaquantum-super-medium (not block chain) and aaquantum-statistics built using cryptography – others can’t, with genuinely novel and enormous ideas in safety versus privacy. The skeptical selection and reasonable-effective-safe-shared skepticism (rational stoicism) makes my developments very includable regardless of belief! Reason behind tolerance - Most of my FB and IITK friends ACT exactly as if they were rational stoic! Why be bothered about minor transgressions as waste of money in health etc., when it is their life any way and I do not have a fully coherent alternative! Intolerance requires coherent alternative and empirical proof that it helps.
ummary:
Joys of retirement
Atomically thin light-emitting device opens the possibility for 'invisible' displays
:
My science-fiction




Friday, March 23, 2018

Characterizing the difference between my tech-fi and sci-fi



All are expected to know sci-fi or Science fiction. Tech-fi or Technological fiction is my invention that is vibrant subset of sci-fi with shared property of dealing with fiction, with the added goal in tech-fi to only use refereed publications of technology and NO sci-fi developments which might deal with unrealized technology. Unlike sci-fi, impossible imagination is not permitted, as are known impossibilities, for example that clash with laws of thermodynamics. Indeed purportive tech-fi may be shown to be sci-fi!

Many unproven but non-conflicting imaginations are responsible sci-fi, for example multiverse narratives. Still, I prefer the knowledge that all technology imagined is extension of what has been theorized or achieved in lab. I have always felt that the philosopher Russell greatly benefitted mankind by succinct clear enunciation of properties or types in logic So that one says (Human x)(Socrates is x Implies Socrates is mortal). Or the great succinct definition of science as a collection of falsifiable. What is tech-fi? Any narrative prose that links to scientific articles before something is imagined by the author!

More important, even than my tech-fi characterization is the enormously clever suppression of second order language paradoxes like Russell ean “barber who shaves all who don’t shave themselves” and Gödel’s, without prohibiting recursion, outlawed incorrectly by all novices! The fix ordered by me is never allow unquantified universals. Thus not (x)(human x Implies mortal x) but (Human x) (… Implies mortal x). You are never allowed to quantify over untyped x. Reason why is it devastate Gödelean problems in that bigger sets than the model of x need quantification over bigger illegal sets! Both consistency and completeness require illegal quantification! That is because (x belongs x) has no model, even in infinities! An automatic strictly included chain results like powerset!

Does not constrain the author except in realm of possible. Many existing sci-fi are tech-fi, like for example the series on moon, mars, spacecraft etc. habitation, miners in asteroid belt, but not star trek despite the uses of its imaginations.

Rest is an example.


All electronics deals with flow of electrons, Magnonics of magnons, which are virtual particles of magnetization. In real world they are actualized as spins. It is a subset of spintronics. Every particle spins.

Now my imagination as tech-fi author - mobile phone charged once a month or solar-charged hence charged never. On cloth measuring hardware for sugars, blood pressure, pulse etc. Talk to your collar with augmented-reality glasses, wide-spread primary medicine stores either medicating or referral. Etc

So far it looks like imagination fantasy of the scientists predicting possible uses. It will be great if the imaginations become stories. With embedded links, these are truly mind-expanding! I can hardly wait for that avatar of mine, marrying two loves!

Many people cannot distinguish between artifacts invented to let a story flow smoothly without inconvenient delays (mobile phones) or capabilities like a doctor (tricorders). Such people express joy at realization of some sci-fi. Far better is realization of some tech-fi, like enormous strength boost, indefinite life (thru transfection using stem cells) and uploading of brains. That is not actualization of sci-fi, but achievement of tech-fi!

Thursday, March 22, 2018

Broad outline of battling the banks


For more cloud ideas read here.

Banks will fight hard for consumer loyalty. Biggest source to them is salary deposition, which shrinks to savings, but in same bank, even while the customer dawdles. The aa-fight-winner will impact banks – current micro-payments are profitable. The aa-fight-winner will act as a significantly lower cost bank with time gap between pay by consumer to supplier. More the supplier hold period can also be done low cost!

Given all this, aa-fight-winner can give some incentive returns to consumer, like cash back, percentage back like discover or some bank cards, higher rates of interest like money-market accounts. While there is some countering, the aa-winner can prevail due to lower costs. Banks will be saddled with higher cost consumers and multi-decade dance between politicians and consumers is likely. All the while, the aa-winner can continue to win by discounts on low prices.

Amazon secret to win in traditional sector is by prime. Under stress, flipkart has required seller sharing of competitive discounts – 60% seller 40% flipkart. Herein lies a remarkable tale of aaquantum-economics validation that is different but basis of my politics. I claim that every consumer class can be say quartile-based, on average elasticity. Given a voter population, magic can happen despite honesty by

1 reading into voter elasticity’s and increasing the burden on issues with low bad-elasticity quartiles in a complete program
2 Confusing language and irrelevant issues
3 Ensure high voting of friends

Note that 2 & 3 & more are known to all, and recommended anyway. 1  is the extra secret.
Same funda applies to bank battle. One can divide buyers into quartiles using ales-label collected data kept secret even from the sellers. Discount campaigns can be run based on consumer and seller data. 

These are to hurt other labels and banks, while minimize hurt of own sellers and consumers.
So the key strategy presented here are discount incentives form lower costs and proper targeting of discounts.

The aaquantum p2p model



It starts to come together!

The p2p or peer-to-peer model is built around elimination of the middleman. Here I am concerned primarily with what it is, and how I can add to it, thus move into forefront uncharted territory where my efforts can be shielded from much deeper pockets even as I maintain these deep-pockets as contemptuous normal intelligence brain-dead sufficiently clever rent-seekers.

What it is: Let us begin with p2p application most widely used, deemed illegal, war for decades, almost won by p2p, with enormous social impact. This is torrents and copying despite copyright protections. It has devastated music, film, journalism etc. Also identity-based industries. The remaining fig-leaves of business can be gutted by my simple proposal.

The location and IP address are required in criminal complaints – otherwise illegal hackitivism, or worse guilt-by-allegation results. They can also be used for better business targeting. Preventive measures total defeat comes from VPN in browser (opera) and down loads by VPN (tails on tor). This pair not only fucks businesses but even NSA! And both are free.

What more on p2p? P2p is god-sent for even don’t-care-agonist like me! It allows the elimination of middle-men in lot more areas. One is by AI and robotics, important but not the goal here. Here we concentrate on innovation, money and bank-lending. Innovation is what Etherum is about! How good the model is its smart recovery after devastating hacking attack – bear the loss, fix the holes and go on. Standard teething problem. Money is what block chains are about. Fortunately for me, bitcoin cannot realistically scale up to become a planetary system. So what about micro-payments? One model evil-bankers love is a block chain of planetary banks with their control on micro-payments routed through them. It will work but I want to be king of the hill and don’t care what happens to evil-bankers.

It is possible to do micro-payments without nation level middle-men using my IBE that will scale up to the planet! It does not depend on any properties of mine beyond any of good IBE, hence extend to Quantum-busting non-malleable IBE! OK-to arrival of genuine shor-capable Quantum computers (adiabatic QC are NEVER going to be shor-capable) and beyond! The boundary can be crossed safely since my method depends on the insight of nested validity periods!

So what is my method? It is based on the insight that one cannot invert a one-way function. That means if a sender sends a one-way of the embedded time sent, the target cannot reuse the communication, construct another like it etc. The sender cannot lie about when sent. (If so, how did the receiver get that message?) All we need is a court. Receiver says I go this message but no money. Sender says I owe and sent! There is an escrow gate. It releases money to second party if first party send it money and second can present encryption and plain text (following decryption that matches) The decision of this court can be within hours and on the net! The escrow gate can use existing bank (money transferred between accounts) or any online merchant! The transaction never used any money or block-chain! Yet enough information trail exists to resolve ALL disputes fairly.
I consider Musk my hero for inventing paypal and then using the results wisely. So is Ramdev, for fucking evil-MBA in general, and preserving trust essential in commerce and sadly devastated in inspector-raj. More power to them. I say that major online battle will erupt for online customers in India. Players include (Chinese thru) paytm, (Goggle thru) Tez, (Walmart thru) Flipkart and Amazon. The winner could well be one armed with my aaquantum-micro-payment-block-chain who clobbers the others!

But what about evil-bankers. Someone is testing waters! P2p lending platform in India, is an innovative investment option which will help you make returns which could be as high as 28%. Your participation as a Lender in writing the success story of p2p lending in India. You can now lend your money online to borrowers and make high returns, all you need to do is to register.


What’s more, since there is no requirement for any physical documentation etc., all this can be done online. The model provides better rates of interest than the traditional model because it removes the intermediaries and connects the lenders directly to the end users – the borrowers. And here every borrower is identity-verified, credit-checked and risk-assessed based on the documents received from them.

The recommended rate of interest ranges from 12% p.a. to 36% p.a. and the loan tenure ranges from 6 months to 36 months. A lender can invest from ₹ 30 thousand to ₹ 7.5 lacs for personal loans and up to ₹ 10 lacs for business loans. In order to provide you access to your own lending account with access to borrower listings, a small nominal registration fee of ₹ 1000/-.


Friday, March 16, 2018

From the Edge of the Universe to the Inside of a Proton



This is one of the few composites that have a religious significance to me, developed from photos in this article:
to be read before or after watching this, sixty years old with rare religious significance
This is the Universe I was born in and understood by classical physics and ubertheries of special and general relativity, quantum mechanics and punctuated natural selection evolution, to be navigated by aaquantum stoicism.

Wednesday, March 14, 2018

skyrmion





skyrmion is a pointlike region of reversed magnetization in a uniform magnet. The skyrmion's“core”—here, pointed up—is surrounded by an axially symmetric twist that returns the spin texture to the background direction (down).
https://physics.aps.org/articles/v8/40

Scientists observe a new quantum particle with properties of ball lightning

This knotted skyrmion may provide insight into a stable ball of plasma that could enhance future fusion reactorsDate:

March 2, 2018
Source:Aalto University
Summary:

Scientists have created, for the first time a three-dimensional skyrmion in a quantum gas. The skyrmion was predicted theoretically over 40 years ago, but only now has it been observed experimentally.
Why interesting
People jave claimed witnessing Ball lightening and claims discarded fot last 40 years.
could lead to finding a solution to keep plasma together efficiently and enable more stable fusion reactors than we have now.