Friday, May 11, 2018

Morning diabetic sugar high: scholarly aaquantum research


Given in my epistemology

1 100% non-scholar non-mm-doctor and 90% of mm doctors are idiots
2 only normal people are cochrane collaboration, SENS, MIT biology and scholars

view my research with care or move on.


Clinical Question

Does metformin increase the risk of fatal or nonfatal lactic acidosis?

Evidence-Based Answer

In patients without standard contraindications to metformin therapy, metformin does not increase the risk of lactic acidosis.1 (Strength of Recommendation = B, based on inconsistent or limited-quality patient-oriented evidence)

Blood Sugar Chart

Updated March 27, 2018
 Print Text Size: A A A
This blood sugar chart shows normal blood glucose levels before and after meals and recommended HbA1c levels for people with and without diabetes.
BLOOD SUGAR CHART
Fasting
Normal for person without diabetes
70–99 mg/dl (3.9–5.5 mmol/L)
Official ADA recommendation for someone with diabetes
80–130 mg/dl (4.4–7.2 mmol/L)
2 hours after meals
Normal for person without diabetes
Less than 140 mg/dl (7.8 mmol/L)
Official ADA recommendation for someone with diabetes
Less than 180 mg/dl (10.0 mmol/L)
HbA1c
Normal for person without diabetes
Less than 5.7%
Official ADA recommendation for someone with diabetes
Less than 7.0%

A Bedtime Snack and Blood Sugar: Diabetes Questions & Answers
Published April 12, 2018 by Gary Scheiner, MS, CDE
 Print Text Size: A A A
Q: Does a bedtime snack help or hurt the wake-up blood sugar reading?
A: Like most things having to do with diabetes, it depends. If you are not taking insulin, bedtime snacks can either cause your wake-up reading to be elevated or force your pancreas to produce extra insulin during the night to offset the effects of the snack — neither of which is a good thing.
Advertisement
If you take insulin, a bedtime snack may be needed if your blood sugar tends to drop overnight. This is often a sign that your basal insulin dose (via injection or a pump) is a bit too high. Basal insulin’s job is to keep your blood sugar steady overnight. So if you’re dropping, you may be getting too much basal insulin. In this case, without a snack, you might wind up with low blood sugar in the middle of the night. And if you overeat or “rebound” from the low, your wake-up reading could wind up too high. So with basal insulin doses that are a bit too high, a snack at night may be necessary. However, it would be better to get the basal insulin dose set properly.
If your basal insulin dose is correct and your blood sugar holds steady through the night without a snack, a bedtime snack will make your blood sugar rise. A dose of rapid-acting insulin would likely be needed to offset the effects of the carbohydrates in the snack.
While we sleep, the body produces a hormone called leptin that curbs appetite. So if you’re trying to shed some body fat, a bedtime snack may be counterproductive. And since excess body fat leads to insulin resistance, all those extra bedtime snacks can lead to higher-than-desired blood sugars in the morning that persist around the clock.
Want to learn more about maintaining target blood sugar levels during sleep? Read “Exorcising the Specter of Overnight Hypoglycemia” and “The Dawn Phenomenon and Somogyi Effect: What You Can Do.”
Gary Scheiner, MS, CDE, is owner and clinical director of Integrated Diabetes Services (www.integrateddiabetes.com, 610-642-6055), a private practice specializing in intensive insulin therapy for children and adults. He and his team of certified diabetes educators work with clients throughout the world via phone and online. Gary has lived with Type 1 diabetes for 30 years and was named Diabetes Educator of the Year in 2014 by the American Association of Diabetes Educators. He has written six books, including Think Like a Pancreas, and is a regular contributor to Diabetes Self-Management.
Disclaimer Statements: Statements and opinions expressed on this Web site are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the publishers or advertisers. The information provided on this Web site should not be construed as medical instruction. Consult appropriate health-care professionals before taking action based on this information.
Advertisement

The Dawn Phenomenon and Somogyi Effect: What You Can Do
https://www.diabetesselfmanagement.com/blog/dawn-phenomenon-somogyi-effect-can/Published October 23, 2017 by Amy Campbell, MS, RD, LDN, CDE
 Print Text Size: A A A
Waking up with a high blood sugar reading is not exactly the way you want to start off your day. Besides rushing to get ready for work or getting the kids off to school (or both), you now have to decide if and how you’ll deal with that reading on your meter. Maybe you decide to skip breakfast. If you take mealtime insulin, perhaps you inject a few extra units. Or you put in some additional time during your workout. Another option is to shrug it off and hope that your blood sugar comes down in a few hours. You might also ponder the reason your blood sugar is high. Could it be that you ate dinner later than usual last night? Or you ate too much carb at dinner? Or maybe it was your snack?
While it’s normal to have high blood sugars when you have diabetes, it’s time to pay attention when the highs become the norm. Morning hyperglycemia (high blood sugar) is frustrating for many people; figuring out the cause is the first step in dealing with (and preventing) it.
Advertisement
Dawn phenomenon: hormones that wreak havoc
It’s easy to blame your morning high on the plate of pasta last night. But while that could certainly be a factor, chances are, your “highs” are a result of hormones. An imbalance of insulin, amylin (a hormone released by the pancreas), and incretins (hormones released by the gut) is the likely culprit. Other hormones get in on the act, too, including glucagon, growth hormone, cortisol, and adrenaline. Why? Overnight, the body gets this idea that it needs fuel (glucose). The witching hour seems to be around 3 AM or so. At this time, the liver and muscles obligingly respond to the signal for fuel and release glucose into the bloodstream. In someone without diabetes, insulin and its other hormone pals kick in to keep blood sugar levels on an even keel. In the case of diabetes, though, those hormones are pretty much missing in action. End result? Blood sugar levels climb. You wake up, check your blood sugar, and it’s above and beyond the “80–130” range. In case you’re wondering, this cascade of events is called the “dawn phenomenon” or “dawn effect.” It’s estimated that between 10–50% of people with either Type 1 or Type 2 diabetes will experience this at one time or another.
What you can do about the dawn phenomenon
• First, figure out what’s happening overnight. This means, for a few days in a row, setting your alarm for around 3 AM and checking your blood sugar, and then checking again when you wake up at your usual time in the morning. If your blood sugar is within your target range when you check at around 3 AM but is high when you wake up, there’s a high likelihood of the dawn phenomenon going on.
• Rethink your bedtime snack. Some experts recommend avoiding carbohydrate close to bedtime. If you can’t squelch those hunger pangs, try eating a low- or no-carb snack, such as a small handful of nuts, a hard-boiled egg, or raw veggies dipped into nut butter that doesn’t contain sugar. On the other hand, other experts recommend eating about 15–20 grams of carb — doing so may prevent the liver from pumping out too much glucose. Examples include a small piece of fruit, 6 ounces of light-style yogurt, or 3 cups of popcorn. Try out both options and see if either one helps to lower your fasting blood sugar.
• Rethink your diabetes medicine. This can mean changing the time when you take your medicine, whether it’s a diabetes pill or bedtime insulin (meaning, take it at bedtime rather than at dinnertime). You might also benefit from changing the type of medication that you take, or even adding a medication, such as a long-acting insulin. Talk with your health-care provider before you make changes to your medication schedule, and discuss any other options that may be available.
• Consider an insulin pump. If you have Type 1 diabetes or Type 2 diabetes and take both fast and long-acting insulin, using an insulin pump can help you better manage your blood sugars overnight and into the wee hours of the morning.
Somogyi effect: rebounding from a low
The Somogyi effect, also called the rebound effect, is named after Michael Somogyi, a Hungarian researcher who first identified it. The claim behind this effect is that the blood sugar goes low overnight. This drop triggers the release of counterregulatory hormones, such as adrenaline, cortisol, growth hormone, and glucagon, which, in turn, signal the liver to release glucose. The result? Blood sugars rebound and are higher than desired in the morning. The theory, too, is that those hormones create insulin resistance, so that it’s sometimes harder to lower those morning readings.
Interestingly, scientists question the Somogyi effect; some studies have failed to prove its existence. Other studies, however, have shown that this occurrence happens in those with Type 1 diabetes.
What you can do about the Somogyi effect
• If you’re curious about the Somogyi effect and think it could be happening to you, once again, you’ll need to wake up during the night to test it out. A low blood sugar at around 3 AM followed by a high blood sugar when you rise and shine could prove this theory to be correct. You might also have the following symptoms: a rapid heart rate, night sweats, a headache, blurred vision, thirst, and/or dizziness.
• Using a continuous glucose monitor (CGM) is another helpful way to get a picture of what your blood sugars are doing overnight. A CGM checks glucose levels about every five minutes, and also will alert you to either high or low glucose levels, using an alarm.
• The best way to stop the Somogyi effect in its tracks is to prevent it in the first place. This means adjusting nighttime diabetes medication (either your sulfonylurea or your long-acting insulin), making sure you eat enough in the evening (no skipping meals), limiting alcohol intake, and planning for exercise more carefully. Talk with your diabetes educator or health-care provider about options that are best for you.
Morning high blood sugar: more food for thought
• Sure, it’s a pain to have to wake up in the middle of the night to check your blood sugar. Remember, though, that this isn’t forever. If you can do this for at least three nights, you should get a clearer picture of what’s happening. Pick nights when you feel well (meaning, you don’t have a cold or the flu), you aren’t planning to exercise between dinner and bedtime, and your bedtime blood sugar is around 150 or so (not too high, but not too low, either).
• Experiment a little with bedtime snacks, as mentioned above. You may find that not eating a snack helps with your morning blood sugar; on the other hand, eating a reasonable carb-containing snack may help, too.
• Pay attention to high-fat dinners and how they may affect your morning readings. Fat doesn’t directly affect blood sugars, but it can increase insulin resistance and also slow the digestion of carbohydrate. This means that four, six, or eight hours later, you’ll see the effect of that fatty meal on your blood sugars. There’s also some evidence that saturated fat can increase or worsen insulin resistance, as well.
• Don’t overlook the role of stress on your diabetes control, too; recent or extreme stress, whether it be issues at work or at home, an illness, or a recent medical procedure, for example — can affect your blood sugars.
• If you have Type 2 diabetes and you continue to wake up with high readings, don’t be afraid to consider starting, switching, or adding medication, including long-acting insulin, especially if lifestyle changes, such as weight lossphysical activity, and meal planning, aren’t enough to get and keep your blood sugars in a healthy range.
Want to learn more about the dawn phenomenon and Somogyi effect? Read “Controlling the Dawn Phenomenon” and “Somogyi Effect.”
Disclaimer of Medical Advice: You understand that the blog posts and comments to such blog posts (whether posted by us, our agents or bloggers, or by users) do not constitute medical advice or recommendation of any kind, and you should not rely on any information contained in such posts or comments to replace consultations with your qualified health care professionals to meet your individual needs. The opinions and other information contained in the blog posts and comments do not reflect the opinions or positions of the Site Proprietor.

Friday, April 13, 2018

Engineer view of science



Phenomenon description may require deep mathematics as it often does – deep theory of partial differentiation, tensor calculus and quantum notation is required to understand deep physics and cutting edge chemistry. It is deeper than me. Same time, I am not so stupid that events have to be reduced to philosophy or law for me to understand them! Can I make a scientific (observer independent, empirical) description of my level of understanding? Pragmatically, I am looking to a level of good intermediate, not an expert in any field, not scared of algebraic mathematics, but certainly far more competent than most doctors, lawyers and business types.
A perfect example came by me, recently. It is discussed next. Not only will you learn about what I want, but the fascinating subject matter – dark matter to be precise.


Most scientists and astronomers believe that normal visible matter is 5% of the universe, reachable and explainable by telescopes. Rest 95% is dark matter and dark energy – responsible for galaxy formation and accelerated universe inflation. When you try to understand why scientists so believe, one goes into deep astronomy and galactic measurements. Two big reasons are
1.       Star rotation towards the end of galaxies (away from center) is too fast (compared to newton law of inverse square. Dark matter explain simply is that there is lot of it more rotating matter not visible to us, hence the too fast rotations are simply wrong calculations from low mass estimates! Black matter is uniform, too small to effect speeds of inner stars, but substantial further away, hence hi speeds.
2.       Distant galaxies show up in multiple images, as if there was intervening matter between, bending light and producing Einstein effect of curvature of space and light lensing

It works and 99% of scientists and astronomers agree. Few do not, biggest theoretician who does not is verlinde. This guy has an entropic gravity theory derived from string theory. Simplest explanation, good for politicians, lawyers, doctors etc (henceforth intellectuals) is that he considers gravity as emergent from entanglement and entropy (hence information)! One of the consequences is that for low mass, newton inverse square law results, while at high masses, the variation is linear. Precisely the MOND empirical theory which fit the data very well (measured rotation speeds of stars) but NO one could explain why so in MOND!

Intellectuals are satisfied with this detail. Most vaguely understand inverse square and linearly inverse law. But I am an engineer. Not so dumb, but not capable of understanding the paper! Now what? Hence this essay. An intermediate engineering understanding level call for, will have significant legal and author implications. Details understood by good intermediate will not have to be written. Explainers will typically address intellectuals and engineers, automatic violence to junk from uncouth priests, politicians, intellectuals and stupid authors. Where are the missing details? Why can’t they be approximated? All pseudos in fact!

A somewhat deeper understanding comes as follows, good for all here. Remember Kreyzig? The attractor at galactic center is a point. One can draw spherical surfaces at various distances to measure the gravity effects there. Area varies as r^2. Hence the intensity felt varies as inverse of that i.e. as Inverse Square. But string theory has the holographic principle that says the effect is as if the entire mass, far enough away, is concentrated on the surface! So far enough away, effect is only linear! Joining the two gives Inverse Square near center to inverse only towards circumference!

Verlinde is not that hard to model for better understanding. Another great understanding to me came from understanding the idea of German shower that sparked NASA interest in fix Hubble mission that changed human view f the Cosmos and great pictures. Most of difficult sounding encryption can be effectively so described. Here is an attempt.

Encryption is about trapdoor impossible one way functions. Trapdoor means a small secret which allows simple calculation of inverse to a trapdoor-impossible function. Most classic trapdoors use multiplication or exponentiation as the one way, and if all computations are carried out in a semi-prime field, the factors of the public modulus render the system trapdoor. The nicest thing about modulo computations is that they follow normal rule, even as some computations are exponentially more complex! A square root or logarithm is fairly easy in ordinary math but trapdoor-impossible in discrete math!

So deep sir math say that certain operations are hard, why so is not the trouble of engineers. ALL my methods are based on user-verifiable algebra or statements to the effect ask any deep math sir!  No hard proofs are employed which makes the consumer dependent on certifications of the examining scientist!

Classic encryption before Identitity based encryption IBE is vulnerable to man-in-the-middle MITM attack where unknown consumers can be fooled by giving them wrong credentials, used well, but easy abuse. Imposter gets between Alice and Bob, pretending to be Bob to Alice, and Alice to Bob. All the while, message exchange is copied. It is prevented some by using the name itself as the key. But traditional IBE has a further problem – how do we know that the name is correct for the identity! My solution to the problem is a number of certificates to my pubic semi-primes that collectively essentially certify that that the identity has passed my identity tests. The simplest, done just once forever, is sending a test link to the email. Suddenly arun.arya@gmail.in@aaquantum has a meaning! The email is delivered by Google only if arun.arya has proved to gmail that aaquantum has verified the identity. Assuming tm.in means (trademark india), big.bazar@gmail.com@tm.in  has meaning too. This is much safer mail! The entire rig morale of challenge-click for every new site goes away, as does plethora of new passwords and their sorry pundits and rules (8 chars, at least one capital and one punctuation)!


The aaquantum ideology



http://aaqg-arunarya.blogspot.in/2018/04/the-aaquantum-ideology.html

1.       I hate social relativism, consider it scientifically stupid, explain the terms used precisely. Social relativism means equality of thinking. Science means observer or theorist independent, implicational evidence, which means extended falsifiable, and stupidity means denial of evidence even when agreeing on what evidence is. Evidence - I claim stupidity since I do not attach equal weights to opinion of others, some are wiser than others on every issue. I consider it POSSIBLE to define scientific superiority, it is NOT racial but achievable and I believe it is scientific in that it can be applied in observer independent manner.

2.       In order to understand me, you must be familiar with very influential work of KUHN starting 1963 in USA. It introduces and describes a paradigm also callable as a scientific revolution. A paradigm shift is not relativistic in that the old and new are two equally important alternatives; but that the newer is SUPERIOR to the old and replaces it! Humans rarely adjust to paradigm shift. The change occurs due to natural selection aspect od Darwinian revolution – oldies die.

3.       For people too busy to follow link (a MUST else remain stupid), here are some paradigm shifts

Natural sciences

Some of the "classical cases" of Kuhnian paradigm shifts in science are:
·         1543 – The transition in cosmology from a Ptolemaic cosmology to a Copernican one.[9]
·         1543 – The acceptance of the work of Andreas Vesalius, whose work De humani corporis fabrica corrected the numerous errors in the previously-held system created by Galen.[10]
·         1687 – The transition in mechanics from Aristotelian mechanics to classical mechanics.[11]
·         1783 – The acceptance of Lavoisier's theory of chemical reactions and combustion in place of phlogiston theory, known as the chemical revolution.[12][13]
·         The transition in optics from geometrical optics to physical optics with Augustin-Jean Fresnel's wave theory.[14]
·         1826 – The discovery of hyperbolic geometry.[15]
·         1859 – The revolution in evolution from goal-directed change to Charles Darwin's natural selection.[16]
·         1880 - The germ theory of disease began overtaking Galen's miasma theory.
·         1905 – The development of quantum mechanics, which replaced classical mechanics at microscopic scales.[17]
·         1905 – The transition from the luminiferous aether present in space to electromagnetic radiation in spacetime.[18]
·         1919 – The transition between the worldview of Newtonian gravity and the Einsteinian General Relativity.

Social sciences[edit]

In Kuhn's view, the existence of a single reigning paradigm is characteristic of the natural sciences, while philosophy and much of social science were characterized by a "tradition of claims, counterclaims, and debates over fundamentals."[19] Others have applied Kuhn's concept of paradigm shift to the social sciences.
·         The movement known as the cognitive revolution moved away from behaviourist approaches to psychological study and the acceptance of cognition as central to studying human behaviour.
·         The Keynesian revolution is typically viewed as a major shift in macroeconomics.[20] According to John Kenneth GalbraithSay's Law dominated economic thought prior to Keynes for over a century, and the shift to Keynesianism was difficult. Economists who contradicted the law, which implied that underemployment and underinvestment (coupled with oversaving) were virtually impossible, risked losing their careers.[21] In his magnum opus, Keynes cited one of his predecessors, John A. Hobson,[22] who was repeatedly denied positions at universities for his heretical theory.
·         Later, the movement for monetarism over Keynesianism marked a second divisive shift. Monetarists held that fiscal policy was not effective for stabilizing inflation, that it was solely a monetary phenomenon, in contrast to the Keynesian view of the time was that both fiscal and monetary policy were important. Keynesians later adopted much of the monetarists' view of the quantity theory of money and shifting Phillips curve, theories they initially rejected.[23]
·         First proposed by Ferdinand de Saussure in 1879, the laryngeal theory in Indo-European linguistics postulated the existence of "laryngeal" consonants in the Proto-Indo-European language (PIE), a theory that was confirmed by the discovery of the Hittite language in the early 20th century. The theory has since been accepted by the vast majority of linguists, paving the way for the internal reconstruction of the syntax and grammatical rules of PIE and is considered one of the most significant developments in linguistics since the initial discovery of the Indo-European language family.[24]

Applied sciences[edit]

More recently, paradigm shifts are also recognisable in applied sciences:
·         In medicine, the transition from "clinical judgment" to evidence-based medicine
·         In software engineering, the transition from the Rational Paradigm to the Empirical Paradigm [25]

Marketing[edit]

In the later part of the 1990s, 'paradigm shift' emerged as a buzzword, popularized as marketing speak and appearing more frequently in print and publication.[26] In his book Mind The Gaffe, author Larry Trask advises readers to refrain from using it, and to use caution when reading anything that contains the phrase. It is referred to in several articles and books[27][28] as abused and overused to the point of becoming meaningless.

4.       To the lists, I wish to add some more based on my experience
. structured programming
. object orientation
. internet programming
. android programming
. quantum mechanics
. deterministic interpretations (Many world)
. two dimensional time interpretation (Arun)
. CCC+LQG cosmogony
. Verlinde string quantum gravity
. Malhotra paradigm shift to identity celebration. I claim that people wrongly consider current mood as rightward shift rather than identity celebration despite the abuses from stupid left
Note that most of my computer science colleagues became useless when object orientation hit, more with internet programming, even current computer scientists become useless in new android programming! QM destroyed physics, deterministic interpretation most science philosophers, two dimensional time (mine) most physicists as Verlinde hits most astronomers and dark matter types and CCC+LQG explains universe without God. The concept of God is useless due to irrelevance, relevant to the stupid only.


The aaquantum ideology



1.       I hate social relativism, consider it scientifically stupid, explain the terms used precisely. Social relativism means equality of thinking. Science means observer or theorist independent, implicational evidence, which means extended falsifiable, and stupidity means denial of evidence even when agreeing on what evidence is. Evidence - I claim stupidity since I do not attach equal weights to opinion of others, some are wiser than others on every issue. I consider it POSSIBLE to define scientific superiority, it is NOT racial but achievable and I believe it is scientific in that it can be applied in observer independent manner.

2.       In order to understand me, you must be familiar with very influential work of KUHN starting 1963 in USA. It introduces and describes a paradigm also callable as a scientific revolution. A paradigm shift is not relativistic in that the old and new are two equally important alternatives; but that the newer is SUPERIOR to the old and replaces it! Humans rarely adjust to paradigm shift. The change occurs due to natural selection aspect of Darwinian revolution – oldies die.

3.       For people too busy to follow link (a MUST else remain stupid), here are some paradigm shifts

Natural sciences

Some of the "classical cases" of Kuhnian paradigm shifts in science are:
·         1543 – The transition in cosmology from a Ptolemaic cosmology to a Copernican one.[9]
·         1543 – The acceptance of the work of Andreas Vesalius, whose work De humani corporis fabrica corrected the numerous errors in the previously-held system created by Galen.[10]
·         1687 – The transition in mechanics from Aristotelian mechanics to classical mechanics.[11]
·         1783 – The acceptance of Lavoisier's theory of chemical reactions and combustion in place of phlogiston theory, known as the chemical revolution.[12][13]
·         The transition in optics from geometrical optics to physical optics with Augustin-Jean Fresnel's wave theory.[14]
·         1826 – The discovery of hyperbolic geometry.[15]
·         1859 – The revolution in evolution from goal-directed change to Charles Darwin's natural selection.[16]
·         1880 - The germ theory of disease began overtaking Galen's miasma theory.
·         1905 – The development of quantum mechanics, which replaced classical mechanics at microscopic scales.[17]
·         1905 – The transition from the luminiferous aether present in space to electromagnetic radiation in spacetime.[18]
·         1919 – The transition between the worldview of Newtonian gravity and the Einsteinian General Relativity.

Social sciences[edit]

In Kuhn's view, the existence of a single reigning paradigm is characteristic of the natural sciences, while philosophy and much of social science were characterized by a "tradition of claims, counterclaims, and debates over fundamentals."[19] Others have applied Kuhn's concept of paradigm shift to the social sciences.
·         The movement known as the cognitive revolution moved away from behaviourist approaches to psychological study and the acceptance of cognition as central to studying human behaviour.
·         The Keynesian revolution is typically viewed as a major shift in macroeconomics.[20] According to John Kenneth GalbraithSay's Law dominated economic thought prior to Keynes for over a century, and the shift to Keynesianism was difficult. Economists who contradicted the law, which implied that underemployment and underinvestment (coupled with oversaving) were virtually impossible, risked losing their careers.[21] In his magnum opus, Keynes cited one of his predecessors, John A. Hobson,[22] who was repeatedly denied positions at universities for his heretical theory.
·         Later, the movement for monetarism over Keynesianism marked a second divisive shift. Monetarists held that fiscal policy was not effective for stabilizing inflation, that it was solely a monetary phenomenon, in contrast to the Keynesian view of the time was that both fiscal and monetary policy were important. Keynesians later adopted much of the monetarists' view of the quantity theory of money and shifting Phillips curve, theories they initially rejected.[23]
·         First proposed by Ferdinand de Saussure in 1879, the laryngeal theory in Indo-European linguistics postulated the existence of "laryngeal" consonants in the Proto-Indo-European language (PIE), a theory that was confirmed by the discovery of the Hittite language in the early 20th century. The theory has since been accepted by the vast majority of linguists, paving the way for the internal reconstruction of the syntax and grammatical rules of PIE and is considered one of the most significant developments in linguistics since the initial discovery of the Indo-European language family.[24]

Applied sciences[edit]

More recently, paradigm shifts are also recognisable in applied sciences:
·         In medicine, the transition from "clinical judgment" to evidence-based medicine
·         In software engineering, the transition from the Rational Paradigm to the Empirical Paradigm [25]

Marketing[edit]

In the later part of the 1990s, 'paradigm shift' emerged as a buzzword, popularized as marketing speak and appearing more frequently in print and publication.[26] In his book Mind The Gaffe, author Larry Trask advises readers to refrain from using it, and to use caution when reading anything that contains the phrase. It is referred to in several articles and books[27][28] as abused and overused to the point of becoming meaningless.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

45.       To the lists, I wish to add some more based on my experience
. structured programming
. object orientation
. internet programming
. android programming
. quantum mechanics
. deterministic interpretations (Many world)
. two dimensional time interpretation (Arun)
. CCC+LQG cosmogony
. Verlinde string quantum gravity

. Malhotra paradigm shift to identity celebration. I claim that people wrongly consider current mood as rightward shift rather than identity celebration despite the abuses from stupid left

Note that most of my computer science colleagues became useless when object orientation hit, more with internet programming, even current computer scientists become useless in new android programming! QM destroyed physics, deterministic interpretation most science philosophers, two dimensional time (mine) most physicists as Verlinde hits most astronomers and dark matter types and CCC+LQG explains universe without God. The concept of God is useless due to irrelevance, relevant to the stupid only.