Aaqgs-recognized-dilemma opt-in versus opt-out

O

other view -

Solving the Opt-in/Opt-out Debate, Privacy Article | Inc.com

Conventionally, liberal side of the issue favors opt_in while conservatives prefer opt-out. What is meant is semantics of people who have not bothered to specify are assumed to have voted in the negation in opt_in, affirmatively in opt-out. Specification is generally hard. A simple abuse philosophy in opt-out is to invent a new method for every new transaction. Then you can claim on every complaint that bothering would never recur. Most people suffer from a second problem – address of agency is not known, nor is how they decode shut requests! How do you terminate the menace of telephone sales and browser hijack?
Consider telephonic sales. If you have explicitly forbidden calls, then they will not be made in opt_out, otherwise they can be made. Opt-out has the difficult problem of locating the forbidding database and meeting its requirements. It is very difficult to implement in opt-in, For many valid targets NEVER bother to sign up in equally difficult opt-in circumstances. Another big issue is impossibility of distinguishing between genuine errors and error-excuse destruction of opt-in.
The first aaqgs-comment is gross stupidity of deciding any issue by ideology. One might devote a small time otherwise, and decide by ideology anyway! But fundamental to aaqgs-belief is that all ideologies are applicable to small subsets of problems and it pays to have some discriminant function between ideologies that reduces to ideology in relevant extreme. This is true in ALL aaqgs-recognized-dilemma that the choice is pissed on stupidity of ideological answer and construction of the interpolation that reduces to ideologies in extreme. It requires brains, readers should try interpolation between the two options before reading on.
The first no-no is to come up with any complex solution that requires government servants or lawyers. These are simply the private-public version of same unproductive philosophical stupidity that serves to destroy productivity.
Fundamental to aaqgs-philosophy is error-free constitution, achieved whenever. For this purpose, the highest principles are

0. aaqqgs-philosophy explicitly recognizes conflicting parties of aaqgs-players. It is a document on rules of non-violent conflict. Once exhausted, only violent conflict remains.No ideology which considers violent conflict as legitimate can be an aaqgs-player.

1. There are rights and duties. No one deficient in duties can argue for rights.
   
2. The rights and duties must be textually enumerated. This is to prevent a party from imposing impossible burdens on adversaries. This does not imply the existence of undocumented duties. They can not be be used in current conflict but maybe incorporated for future conflicts. Professional judges are crucial in that they expand the law while delivering equitable judgement on current case.
   
3. The preferred aaqgs-solution is to invent a continuous measure which can be measured transparently and whose value decides the degree of closeness of ideological points. In case above, one must have opt-in-ishness-chooser which leans to opt_in when 1 and opt_out when 0. There is a very simple continuous numerical function obtained by analogy to grades – percent of population below and above. One extreme is nice multi-modes corresponding to grades. Other is a uniform distribution when interval schemes have to be used. In either case, depending on philosophy, an optin-ishness-chooser can be constructed. In fact, crime convictions are no longer digital 1 or 0, instead better done as percent of jury convinced above a threshold of clean chit that the convict is considered liable for. Death penalty can be abolished if what happens to a convict after such conviction, is no longer justifiable but left to the state including corporal punishment. Death penalty should not be considered as punishment but as a cessation of judicial protection on application with the thereafter treatment entirely political! Such convicts can be executed, used as mine-canary, drug-study-victims organ-sources etc, or simply life imprisoned based on political votes of others. As always, there is a popular democratic choice which is decides, never any intellectual moron which ALL are against the dynamic will of the people. Both aacqgs-religion and aaqgs-philosothy (i.e. ethics and law) are aaqgs-dynamic and different from ALL OTHERS up to this point which are condemned to be static and eternal in theory, while not so in practice through transparent lying, reinterpretation and sect-formation; three unpardonable sins aaqgs-free from now and forever.
   
4. Neither judgements can be delivered based on analogy, nor can argumentation be made by analogy, the parties in both cases must be either successfully master or be fired.
   

Security is the zeroth and highest aacqs-goal. That being so, one can safely assume its use to justify anything and describe its invocation by competition as politically motivated non-sense. Essen
It is the highest aaqgs goal to design popular vote answers where the will of members can be applied in a democratic manner without aaqgs-hard barriers implementation which constrains the future to a path. This can, however, be done by allowing irreversible steps now but only allowed by courts. For rapid pronouncements, the supreme court is of life-long tenure and insulated from cases of individuals, more like an administrative court with appointments from the high courts by repeated direct elections, giving it the flavor of judicial senate, and also popular removal every few years. It is this that prevents dictatorship and arbitrariness.
Second highest goal is efficiency. A society with high rates of growth

Aaqgs-development – on the issue of proven applicability

How does one prove that one system subsumes the other? simple in axiomatic systems – one shows that every axiom of one system is subsumed in the other, either as axiom or derivation. In fact, one can show two systems have equal power by showing each subsumes the other, and strictly bigger by proving that one valid subsume in one cannot be derived in the other. A more defined system may be stronger than a subsume r. For example, anything subsumes all other systems and nothing can be subsumed by any system. The real issue is useless loss of generality.
With this in mind, let us compare legal/ethical distinction with class distinction. If there are two classes a & b, one can simulate them easily by two ethics classes such that they always act as a & b! Clearly then, my distinction is at least as powerful as MARXISM. It is more whenever you are forbidden to ascribe difference in behavior for non-economic reasons, for example attitude on education in Greek or Latin. QED
People disagree on many things, not always on hidden economic reasons, some times for aesthetic reasons. One can always find economic hidden reasons by similar process as one can see penis and vagina in every line drawing or photograph. Rather than argue with such bums, better prescription is the ignore such sub animal emfubar and use contemptible language if not avoidable. NEVER show any respect beyond that required by the occasion.

A non-ideological approach to life is aaqgs-mandated. In every situation, some pre-filtering has to be done before ideological application and differences can be selected. Only time it is different when a subsumes b and both are applicable. Many problems can be answered in equivalent ways. It may indeed be a surprise, with resolution forty years in future, as the violation of Bell limits finally laid the quantum ghost of hidden variables to rest. It has taken another fifty years to combat the ghost of collapse to rest and has just begun.

Aaqgs-recognized-dilemma – Law versus ethics

Internet goes everywhere, time to progress into 21^st century bereft of earlier experienced moronic incompetent intellectuals like shuck able garland of weights.

aaqgs-I consider Law versus ethics far more important than class distinction to understand history and predictions. Ethical behavior is an internal mechanism -- as individuals we perceive "right and wrong" in a particular situation and act accordingly. Law, on the other hand,  is "external".  There are rules, promulgated by others, and we choose to comply with those rules or not.  The rules may or may not reflect our perception of right and wrong -- but they represent a consensus of what rulers of society feels is "right" or "wrong".   So there is a major distinction between ethics and law.  Simply following the rules does not make an action ethical -- at least that's the lesson of the Nuremberg war trials.  Nor is violation of an unjust law or rule necessarily unethical -- for example, Gandhi's march to the sea to evade the British salt tax, or Rosa Parks taking a seat at the front of the bus may have been illegal, but not necessarily unethical.

History is replete with examples of ethical dilemma created by legal class distinction hurt caused by ruler defined arbitrary laws which favor one identifiable gelled class over another. All laws are generally hurtful to some, but not the others, all the adjectives are important to prevent an author from creating virtual classes of the loser's from any law. The classes must be identifiable and sufficiently organized to demand consideration. A unification organizing effort is needed prior to consideration of the losers, caused or historical. The battle of independence of colonies, of people of color, voting beyond sexes, color discrimination and sex discrimination can be looked so.

But that is history. Anyone a competent can refine the semantics to make the past conform to a's historical account. Then in the guise of “intelligent don't let the history repeat”, it is applied to predictions to argue for desired actions. So common is this technique of thugging, particularly non-skeptic intellectuals that it deserves a neologistic name – semantic-thuggery. A vast super-majority of so called historians are not just reliable event writers, but lunatic subhumans with pet theories of what the events correspond to, and hence devoid of any respect, considered unnecessary burden on Exchequer and should be fired mercilessly. Any useful history will have a number of readers that will financially support the non-science intellectuals.History is simply respectable conspiracy theory

Even science is supported by empirical argument that it is possible to feel the benefits of patent and copyright regime in a far less restrictive, democratic, non-exclusive manner even though it is not administered so but by self-chosen contradictory (up to relevant scientists to deal with them) schemes which must NEVER be open to micro-management by politicians. In this scheme, popular science is rational stoic for all else, a statistical rational skepticism where the pure science rational skepticism (even for scientists re other fields) for effort cost reasons. Advertisement is necessary evil, only solution is internet based rational skeptic database of branded values. Brand values are measurable in non-monopoly-circumstances with $ price averages and spread, indicating the efficiency of inspectors, workers, processes as standard deviation for legally defined sets of services and products. In other words, it must be illegal to provide services below the minimum not defined by a fine print.

Elimination of fine-print is possible and central to my political advantage. It is this, not Marxian class warfare, that define the next few centuries. The evil gelled class is lawyers by super-majority, the success of my program is reduction of professional lawyers to 10-20% of now. It will greatly benefit production, sales, and citizenry to eliminate fine print. It can be done by aaqgs-deviation-contract limit in all fields. Every transaction has a deviation from government printed rules. The length of deviation may be some percent of legal contract length, say 10%. That is the number of bytes the transaction wordage can be from the government contract.

Consider a rental. There are some government rules based on parties in power and court judgments. All modifications and fill-in-blanks constitute the deviation. The full applicable contract can be printed out by a simple program. Quick look at deviation tells the consumer, interest or not.

Parking slip: same thing. Deviations printed on ticket.

A lawyer is NOT very smart. His experience enables him to rapidly match paragraphs with the standard. A longish document becomes a set of deviations. Right cases pop up to match the deviations. It is like human way to do chess, vastly different from poor AI of analyzing trillions of positions. One easy way to test I am right is to finally find a method to emfubar lawyers as a class. It also works to decimate reverse engineers from source code for complex software.

Idea is to break up things into small chunks, instructions in software. Consistent with required order, they are dissociated from semantic order, but some other order, usually some strange, but not arbitrary sense. In programming, it is by name. So all the declarations are moved up, sorted by type and alphabetical by name. Further, all non-recursive procedures are open to possible inline expansion. Consistently, code sentence-set is reordered. Such code is very hard to read. Things are even better for lawyers. To emfubar them, infrequent words or words without court case history can be used.

It is said in lawyer community that only the lawyer who draws up a good contract, like premarital, can prepare a destruction case. My rules eliminate that! No fine print is possible. Deviation-only rule has enormous applications in business contracts and options-trading!

Another way to start

Standard business processes are risk/return based. Being circumjstantially very risk averse, question is “can I launch a business”? Even clouds businesses imply risk. But there is one very narrow business thgat I am uniquely suited to, that can give me a risk less start and generate money to the level that stndard risk/retu7rn analysis will apply. What is wonderful that same can be used to start a number of ventures and truoly one can live with a string of failures. That itself is an overwhelming advantage over ALL capitalists no matter how rich or advanced they are now or later.

It is base don internet of Things. Within one year, IoT will begin sweeping even advanced world like ble is over USA. Point is that I can expect IoT based entrepreneur emfubarring big shots earthwide starting 2018. Every one of these aaqgs-pustulates will have a common problema – how to trademark their production. And thre is NO polit5ical or Legal solution, only aaqgs-solution! Matters not if you believe in my uniqueness, widespreadness of problema et.c. The key poiint is that it is email based problema and solutiopn. I can start without capital and grow at business speed. All sent to me are integers generated by a process in tge entreprenure, All I do is in return mail, give tou uncomputable but heckable response. Using this pair, IoT things can talk securely, any one to any one. Simple capability based hings prevent cross-site-scripting and confused-deputy attacks.

-=-=-=-=

What the ‘Internet of Things’ Means for Entrepreneurs

It seems that everything can connect to the internet now – your computer, your smartphone, your watch, your TV, and even your car. The internet is quickly becoming a system of “things”. How does the idea of the Internet of Things translate for entrepreneurs? Opens up numerous opportunities that were not always an option. Etension disrupting disruptors of social media or e-mail to the phone, or via fax or snail mail. You need me bad to prevent mass hack witho0ut enabling NSA! Criminals and Terrorist will eat nations like India alive.

Streamline the Hiring Process Did you know that technology can actually help pick between candidates for a job position from  hundreds to thousands of applications each day, with emfubar politicians finding outrageous discrimination claims!

Cut Down on Team Size

Think of how much easier things can be around the office when everything is automated. Minus chaprasi and corrupt babu.. Even your coffee maker can be set to come on at a certain time. create a more digitized workspace. You may even be able to operate your full business from a small, one-room workspace.

Manage Your Health the Techie Way

Digital health products are everywhere. You can track your daily steps through watch-like devices, log of everything you ate through the day and the number of calories you , count more glasses of , monitor your heart rate and blood pressure through your smartphone.

Better Manufacturing Processes

Think of an assembly line where a product has to pass through several stations until it becomes one whole product. IOT same - allow different facilities to communicate with each other.

.

Different Industries Will Connect

Bbusiness owners will be able to see a connection between their industry and others. revolutionary for future innovation opportunities. product safety test results with its consumers via the web or smartphone app. Or, it can share the same results to a higher-intelligence division of the company for suggestions to improve the results. having immediate access to your insights is incredibly important to maintaining customer trust, learning what marketing strategies work, and expanding your business to new customers.

.

Also Recommended Read: How Do You Know That You Have Got a Great Startup Idea?

-=-=-=-=-=

Above is a beautiful example of naïve emfubar head-in-cloudds moronic Humanities authors. I tell you harsher realty!

1.       Above is heaven description. You need 2 criminal per hundred to make EVERYONE demand privacy. Best way to fuck business emfubars – have an annual identity. Only let government security use aadhaar data. Emfubar every one else.

2.       It is aaqgs-possible to have uncomputable business identities which allow single use id and check, but will make correlation aaqgs-impossible (i.e. strong-crypto-impossible but not to nation-security).

3.       I am COUNTING on every free nation to forbid unbreakable encryption communication, but still enough to emfubar NSA. Very very hard, but I can, even better PROVE, under suitable non-disclose non-compete non-use.

The forced delay from impossible bugs has had one useful side-effect – a proof on paper!

Another way to start

Standard business processes are risk/return based. Being circumstantially very risk averse, question is “can I launch a business”? Even clouds businesses imply risk. But there is one very narrow business that I am uniquely suited to, that can give me a risk less start and generate money to the level that standard risk/return analysis will apply. What is wonderful that same can be used to start a number of ventures and truly one can live with a string of failures. That itself is an overwhelming advantage over ALL capitalists no matter how rich or advanced they are now or later.

It is based on Internet of Things. Within one year, IoT will begin sweeping even advanced world like BLE is over USA today. Point is that I can expect IoT based entrepreneur emfubarring big shots earth-wide starting 2018. Every one of these aaqgs-postulates will have a common problem – how to trademark their production. And there is NO political or Legal solution, only aaqgs-solution! Matters not if you believe in my uniqueness, widespread of problems etc. The key point is that it is email based problems and solution. I can start without capital and grow at business speed. All sent to me are integers generated by a process in the entrepreneur, All I do is in return mail, give you uncomputable but hackable response. Using this pair, IoT things can talk securely, any one to any one. Simple capability based things prevent cross-site-scripting and confused-deputy attacks.

-=-=-=-=

What the ‘Internet of Things’ Means for Entrepreneurs

It seems that everything can connect to the internet now – your computer, your smartphone, your watch, your TV, and even your car. The internet is quickly becoming a system of “things”. How does the idea of the Internet of Things translate for entrepreneurs? Opens up numerous opportunities that were not always an option. Extension disrupting disruptors of social media or e-mail to the phone, or via fax or snail mail. You need me bad to prevent mass hack witho0ut enabling NSA! Criminals and Terrorist will eat nations like India alive.

Streamline the Hiring Process Did you know that technology can actually help pick between candidates for a job position from  hundreds to thousands of applications each day, with emfubar politicians finding outrageous discrimination claims!

Cut Down on Team Size

Think of how much easier things can be around the office when everything is automated. Minus chaprasi and corrupt babu.. Even your coffee maker can be set to come on at a certain time. create a more digitized work-space. You may even be able to operate your full business from a small, one-room work-space.

Manage Your Health the Techie Way

Digital health products are everywhere. You can track your daily steps through watch-like devices, log of everything you ate through the day and the number of calories you , count more glasses of , monitor your heart rate and blood pressure through your smartphone.

Better Manufacturing Processes

Think of an assembly line where a product has to pass through several stations until it becomes one whole product. IOT same - allow different facilities to communicate with each other.

.

Different Industries Will Connect

Business owners will be able to see a connection between their industry and others. revolutionary for future innovation opportunities. product safety test results with its consumers via the web or smartphone app. Or, it can share the same results to a higher-intelligence division of the company for suggestions to improve the results. having immediate access to your insights is incredibly important to maintaining customer trust, learning what marketing strategies work, and expanding your business to new customers.

.

Also Recommended Read: How Do You Know That You Have Got a Great Startup Idea?

-=-=-=-=-=

Above is a beautiful example of naive emfubar head-in-clouds moronic Humanities authors. I tell you harsher realty!

1.       Above is heaven description. You need 2 criminal per hundred to make EVERYONE demand privacy. Best way to fuck business emfubars – have an annual identity. Only let government security use aadhaar data. Emfubar every one else.

2.       It is aaqgs-possible to have uncomputable business identities which allow single use id and check,, but will make correlation aaqgs-impossible (i.e. strong-crypto-impossible including NSA but not to nation-security).

3.       I am COUNTING on every free nation to forbid unbreakable encryption communication, but still enough to emfubar NSA. Very very hard, but I can, even better PROVE, under suitable non-disclose non-compete non-use.

The forced delay from impossible bugs has had one useful side-effect – a proof on paper!