aging trick

To escape Facebook stupidity

https://aaqg-arunarya.blogspot.com/2019/05/aaquantum-aging.html

Aaquantum-Aging trick

LATEST

As name implies, following is my thoughts, presented in hope of being useful and attracting criticism. All scholarly aaquantum-theories begin by epistemology i.e. who to believe and why. Masters abstracted are always subject to internal criticism and adding other statements may in fact cast doubts!

The masters I follow are Harvardian Dr. Sinclair and Ancient wizard Dr. Aubrey de Grey. Sinclair made enough money from red grape elements (likely no-greed), discovered aging in yeast and in rats (sirutins) and now selected by NASA for medical work on mars astronauts. Both use their thoughts on self and family. Grey was dept. head in oxford pre-retirement, has talked 20 years on aging, heads sens. He considers death as an unnecessary event. First is bio-chemist, second CS, likely not-slave to backward teaching.

Both have zero interest in extending age, only healthy part of life. Even if fail in extending life, following their prescription will at least extend healthy life. I will report on experiences too. Aging challenges science itself because one cannot wait for third party reports in a very dynamic area.

There is absolute distrust in me for the statement “I don’t know” from a doctor.  It is followed by internet search to view claimants and their belief systems. Fully discounted is glacial US legal system which still lives in  pregnant mothers safety! Very trustworthy are UK Cochrane reports and japan equivalent to fda.

Here is my experiences. Vitamin K2 is not even known to USA FDA. In MK-4 form, it is allowed in Japan. MK-7 is the better version! So I take K2/MK-7+_D3+Calcium+Mg for bone strength. Osteopenia and osteoporosis is common in developed and underdeveloped. In both elderly suffer kidney stones and arthritis. For bone strength people eat calcium and d3. But not K2! Can’t get enough K2 from diet unless you like rotting soybean! Lucky have K2-generating bacteria in stomach that make it from K1. Others miss k2! Why need it? To deposit calcium in bones! Deposit in arteries and veins is arthritis. In kidney are stones, even gall bladder. Right story – checked through doctors. But wrong to expect them to generate narrative, know re K2 etc..

At last my mother got sick with aggravated heart-like symptoms – doctor prescribed medicines basically K2, D3 and Ca with Mg. Six time more expensive, short duration, will happen again. I think escaped. Incidentally my teeth pain/cost has shrunk. Its all k2 magic!

I think two magics make wait for top doctor-advised regime later. One is energy add through nmn/nad+ but must be some right. Stupid to- eat nmn except sublingual, escape worry about side-effects or miss crossing brain-blood interface!

Other is the amazing power of garbage collecting senescent cells that manage to dodge apoptosis! It is essential to benefit from reduced count for organ-rejection, cancers and aging. Rapamycin and friends, but dangerous as depress immune system! Very complex supplement dosage!

Theoretical Genuine FTL to be experimented with

Latest

1.      It is known that entanglement is at least 10000 times faster than vacuum light! Bell violation extends over 12 hours!

Every one says my goals not possible. Here is why.

It is possible in regular QM. The no communication theorem applies if the shared states share semi-systems are modified by anything except entanglement! The state matrices in this case are expanding and contracting only!

.First mybelief is that quantum weirdness dissipates once wormholes are admitted astimeless connections (wlog (without loss of generality) even finite entanglement speeds greater than light ok) and travel to past requires exceeding entanglement speeds!

2.        Quantum tunneling is simply from evanescent waves. Simultaneous states are from wormhole connections. Entanglement is also so. Quantum-ness is from appreciable effects at quantum sizes, larger objects have exponentially reducing weirdness, till Schrodinger-cat macro objects having probabilities requiring wait-intervals vastly greater than known possible universe life!

Thus the region between light speeds and entanglement speeds is just Cerenkov radiation. Note that going from macro to micro has been answered without qualitative differences but nanotechnology is 21^st century different.

Now consider a claimed post-light experiment that sends info-FTL. It is based on three facts

1.       Entanglement travels faster than light and extends no matter what the space distance.

2.       It is possible to detect if a state is entangled or not by local product information.

3.       Entanglement is only operation that does not kill entanglement with remote particle.

What it means is allowing the send of one bit per death! Consider an entanglement vector where each particle-vector is carried several light years away. Let us assume that the sites have synchronized clocks. At predetermined intervals, the states are viewed for entanglement. To send a binary message, wlog let us assume that to send a 1, the particle at send end is destroyed (apparent) and nothing done if zero. The ESD is apparent with multiple entanglement, as the remote join is preserved and can be restored with newer entanglement. Note that we do not require any quantum information capabilities at all. Clock synchronization but for reference frame relative speeds can be done by an event entangled bit that turns on to start the reading part.

ESD for natural causes requires redundancy but no new theory beyond classic.

The reason why it works faster than light is that I think the loss of entanglement information propagates at entanglement speeds, but may at light speed limit, hence needing an experiment!

Consider 4 light years away or even a spacecraft a few light hours away, what new things with faster than light communication possible, even if no mass or information can exceed light limit, maybe entanglement alone! For one, quantum teleportation becomes superluminal!

Using no entanglement to communicate faster than light

In some sense, this is a climb-down. It follows because entanglement is not necessary! It requires nothing fancy to do better than 1 bit@liight-speed! If you capture an image in a telescope, you get lots of bit at once! If you focus at a spot and take the image MANY TIMES, THE SPEED OF INFORMATION CAN EXCEED LIGHT SPEED. If image is of bits, not any image, you are communicating faster than light. That is what is happening in entanglement write-up – entanglement makes it harder to see, and indeed the method is a different way to communicate. But not faster in any way.

Assuming entangle information takes zero time, imagine groups A and B distant by 4 light years. You can get the state of sending particles at once but not even fraction of a bit before 4 years. The pattern makes only sense after applying that image.

Once started, pipelining is possible.

So is earlier methods good for anything? Automatic delay-proof encryption! 

Does it mean that faster communication is dead? My work so far. I have no idea of how to do it, if at all, without sacrifice of entanglement proportional to the length of message but doing so attacks a theorem that it can’t be done. That is certainly Nobel Prize work i.e. highly unlikely to work except at high probability, which gets around the no-go theorem.

Using entanglement to communicate faster than light - image and sending

latest link

What does send mean with entanglement? Proper question after agreeing 1 bit faster than light send.

How is an image get sent so that all its bits are transmitted in parallel? Let us assume that many images are transported to communicate each other fast by pipeline. At the sender, we have the notion of each list of particles being updated based  on bit vectors, being prepared in parallel. The first bit is dedicated to signalling when the image-vector is ready by say 0, shortly changed to 1 and kept at 1 till the image is used again. The receiver reads the corresponding entangled bits by local entanglement in parallel. So a 00011010 is parsed (00)(01)(10)(10). If second 1 means previous right, then first bit is ignored, rest reads 000. Local entanglement is used to read values synchronously without losing any global entanglement and assuming that entangled particles have random values at some maximum rate slower than the cycling rate of lists! The bit vector read at sender is same as one sent.

The entangled bits are not required to be constant, only constant to a rate and can flip random slower. This is because we only report the particle being right or wrong, the values do not change before being read.

More complex protocols can achieve various error correcting codes.

Light is needed! Even though the constituents are entangled across space, IT IS THE IMAGE COMMUNICATED that determines the different orders. The image can be assembled in parallel, but is communicated only at light speed at most! If there are only 1 bit per image then light speed is the best possible!

Entanglement death ESD also suffers from rebirth and allows control. These complications is fertile ground for Entanglement engineers of the future and have no fundamentally impossibility implications.

Using entanglement to communicate faster than light

latest version

Sent to many including great friend Lov Grover.

It is known that entanglement is at least 10000 times faster than vacuum light! Bell violation extends over 12 hours!

Every one says my goals not possible.



The intuition is as follows -


0. The problem is that once you modify by read or write, entanglement is lost

1. All changes due to relative velocities of source with destination and the estimation steps are straight forward. If used on ON-EARTH, EARTH-MARS AND EARTH-MOON - LINKS ARE MUCH SIMPLER being an astronomical problem. We assume single entanglement of, say spin, in what follows.

2. There are at least 3 entangled particles A & B & C per bit sent with values known at sender and receiver. Unread particles may be duplicated preserving entanglement in some cases. Some how initial entangled pair of atoms/photons are transported (under light-speed shipping) Then the entangled particles are locally duplicated so that handling losses are limited to sacrifices of three copies per bit.

3. One bit can be obtained from the 1st particle A. The experiment to determine its value destroys the local entanglement partner but value same at sender and receiver. It is either right or wrong wrt (with respect to) bit to be sent.

4. We never encode the value! Instead we encode whether the value of the first particle is right or not wrt the bit to be sent! If right, B is sent next.  If not, second is C and is sent.

5. This process will require many light steps. But we can simultaneously send many bits, making the average faster than light speed per bit. In fact, an image of 100,000 or more is collected and sent at once.

6. The 0, 1 values are replaced by recognition of which particle was sent done by value in second bit, obtained by experiment, hence destroys entanglement but of a copy.

7. The problem has been attempted many times by very smart people, so could be wrong. Why, I need to know!

8. Only experiments on local entangled copies need to be done, so the globally entangled bits can be reused. In fact, the only need for A arises to get its entangled instantaneous value, determines B and C values. That may be some random value. As many entangled bits per image, times 3, is what this proposal needs.

9. What is different? Rather than read or write, we use only relational expression!

10. Standard error-correction and boosting machinery can be used for entanglement death. Periodic under-light-speed update is necessary to refresh of dead particles beyond particles kept in storage.